MovieChat Forums > Smiley's People (1982) Discussion > Why does Smiley burn the photo/negative?

Why does Smiley burn the photo/negative?


At one point Smiley burns a photo or a negative. I can't see any point to this. Why did he do that?
.

reply

Both men in the pic were dead by that point so it served no purpose for blackmail. Still, one would have thought the negative had some historical value. Destroying the negative struck me as idiotic.

reply

I agree. And people make out like this segment of the miniseries had a lot of wonderful "spycraft" in it. If pointlessly burning a negative that was actually valuable information is great "spycraft", then count me out.
.

reply

Why would anyone want it? It's got too many bloodstains on it for anyone's liking and they already have enough evidence to turn both Grigoriev and Karla.

reply

He was a one man army at that time, on a suicide mission of sorts. He had no friends, no contacts, he couldn't report to any superior, because he didn't have a case. He only reported when it was more or less a done deal. At that point, he was alone in enemy territory, so to speak. And what was vital wasn't the clue itself, but what it was leading to. And as soon as he "got" what it was all about, the negative ceased to be important. Though as it could still be important to his enemies, he burned the negative so it wouldn't fall into the wrong hands. And the information was already in his head. He was just precautios...

reply

There's no way it could have been important to his enemies. The dramatic burning didn't make sense, and pointlessly and overdramatically took up way too much airtime.
.

reply

I can't think of a valid reason to burn the negative, either.

He didn't just throw it away, rip it up or flush it down the toilet. He took the trouble of burning it up to make sure it was destroyed. So it's not just that the negative wasn't necessay any more, it actually had to be destroyed, I guess.

However, keep in mind that Le Carre wasn't an ordinary writer who conjured stuff up to make suspense or drama. He did serve in the secret service and base his novels on his experiences. That's why his works feel so realistic. Particularly concerning his main character Smiley, everything he did or said had a purpose. Just because you or I can't figure it out doesn't mean it's pointless or idiotic. There's probably an explanation in the book, which I haven't read yet.

Edit:

Perhaps it was out of respect to Otto. It may be that Smiley did not want a naked foursome picture to be the last thing left from him. Smiley wasn't exactly sentimental, but he did respect certain people.

Never be complete.

reply

I have read through your posts. Security is all important within the security services. Destruction of the negative was a sensible precaution because it had served its purpose.

Smiley asks Guillam for a match but is offered a gold lighter. Cigarette lighters play a significant role in this story, irrespective of whether they carry an inscription or not. It is a useful link in the drama.

Wake up, people!

reply

I think mainly for drama's sake. The symbolic ending of one episode and the beginning of another.

reply

Well, why should he want to keep it? It had served its purpose. To keep it was insecure. Smiley, at his time of life, was not a collector of kinky photographs and the subject matter was probably repugnant to him.

reply

I agree. I don't think it happened in the book. I think it's meant to draw a line in the plot to emphasise that all the investigations are complete and all that remains is to turn both Grigoriev and Karla.

reply

I think that's correct. Also, that negative had been the cause of several deaths and so Smiley probably didn't want it languishing in the Circus archives. The point someone made above about it preventing salacious viewing is also right. And finally I think there may have been something about its destruction helping to protect Claus Kretzschmar and his lovely family, and also Mme Ostrakova. It was a dramatic moment for the screen which, as you say, wasn't in the book.

reply

One lone frame? It is the only 'outside' clue to a wealth of film and documentary material in the top secret files of the circus. It had served its purpose and only could do conceivable harm.

reply