The book


Anyone else read the book? Much better than the film imo but the film tried to do it justice.

Regards
Michael

reply

I read the book like five years ago or so. Ran into it by accident in a library. I think it was really great and I'm not sure as to whether or not I should see the movie.

reply

Don't bother with the movie if you really liked the premise of the book. The book has a far better explanation of 'werewolves' than this dimwitted movie.

reply


I don´t know the book, only the film.

and the film is very origin, very good; with subjective camera (is that the term?)- i think it´s warmlight - and subjective accoustic for the wolves ... the sight and the hearing are very different from usual,it´s wonderful. and it´s very atmospherical.
someday i´ll have the possibility to read the novel and i´ll be glad if it´s as good as the film. i can imagine that both complement one another: the book gives informations that were not able to be given in film, the film gives "reality" to it.

cheers

m.


ALL LIFE IS EQUAL

reply

the book is so much better than the film , that the only thing they really have in common is the detectives investigating the killings , and the title ! personally I would love to see a remake of the film using new technology and following the story line a little closer ! even saying this , I will admit that it was a fairly good attempt for the time it was made !.....by the way I was in my teens when I read the book , and it had me looking over my shoulder now and then whenever I was in the woods !

reply

In your teens...I was in the 5th grade when I read it! It was the first novel I ever read- lol. It terrified me, especially when I stayed the night at my fathers house (divorced) in the boonies, surrounded by rolling, wooded hills. My step-brother and I always had to go outside and bring in the firewood at night...The movie "Silver Bullet" also scared the sh*t out of me as a kid. Werewolves were definitely what had me trembling when I was a kid.

Although, when I was really young, my mother said I was scared to use the bathroom after I saw "Gremlins" because I was convinced there was one hiding behind the shower curtain, waiting to get me. LMAO. To grow up in the 80's. Nowadays kids aren't too scared of anything. Though my niece was pretty freaked out by the "Cats Eye" ghoul.

When I finally caught part of the movie- "Wolfen," I was like "What the *uck is this?" Major letdown, as most book-to-movies are.

reply

The book and movie incarnations are a bit different. The book wolfen are a separate species of more human-like wolf, think more convergent evolution but not ever outright confirmed as werewolves. One character based on a book he found takes the theory very seriously and it gets him killed.

I feel like the movie Wolfen have a cool presence in that they get a mythological booster shot, but i feel like i felt more immersed by the book wolfen more, especially when you get multiple chapters retold from their POV.

Communities left for being out of touch: Gamefaqs, Home Theater Forum
Also left a group on Flickr

reply

It's very pulpy - it's full of lines like 'He didn't know he had only two minutes to live' - often pretty dumb, and it's nowhere near as ambitious as the film. It has its moments, but it's really best regarded as just a springboard for the film.


"Gentlemen, is this a great moment or a small one? I'm afraid I don't know."

reply

[deleted]

The info on wolves is really good in the book, as is the way he heightens it - I liked the bit about the only way you can lose your scent is taking a bath, and even then you'll regain it just by the effort of drying yourself.

I haven't seen Communion, which seems to have pretty much vanished off the face of the Earth (maybe it was abducted?). Is it really true that Walken boogies with the ETs?


"Gentlemen, is this a great moment or a small one? I'm afraid I don't know."

reply

[deleted]

its much better than the film ! the writing isnt that great , but the descriptions and situations are great , and the creatures are so much more than the film would have us believe ! it is a film that should be remade . one of the few times when cgi would really be a plus !

reply

Agree. This book is stupid. A real "kalkon" (turkey). Tryes to be horror, exciting, romance, drama, crime. And it fails all! The people in the book - all of them - are more stupid then the jetset-ers in Burial ground nights of terror. One of the most ridicolus books I have ever been reading.

reply

I have never seen the movie - but I read the book about a month ago...I had no idea that this movie was based on that book - even though I knew of the movie...
(didn't read the book in English, so I never really noticed the original title)

Now I want to see it...though I'll probably be disappointed ;o)
In the description of the movie it sounds like Wilson is the main character - when in the book it was Neff....




"We are the keepers of the sacred words: Ni, Peng and Neee-wom!"

reply

I don't remember Indian shape-shifters in the book. I thought the movie was typical Hollywood rubbish.

reply

There weren't any Indian shapeshifters in the movie either, that's just what the detective thought they were.

reply

I've read the book (and am re-reading it now) and seen the film, though I saw the latter first (probably the best way to do that with any film-of-the-book).

I think both are excellent in their own ways, and each complements the other (cf HEAT and LA TAKEDOWN); whereas the book is, as others have said, much better in its depiction of the wolfen and their origins, and has two outstandingly atmospheric scenes (Wilson's night stakeout and the climax), the film takes elements of those scenes and creates its own magic. For example, the stake out in the old church merges several scenes in the book and adds its own aspects yet comes out very well.

Similarly although arguably the most effective story strand from the book - the wolfen's origin and the 'race memory'/folklore links to vampires - is absent from the film, the native American element added to the film is quite effective.

Probably the most disappointing element of the film if the fact that the wolfen are simply depicted as wolves, whereas in the book they are clearly positioned as a separate species, not wolf or human but something else. Clearly, though, this is mainly a result of the limits of film FX technology of the time.

To make up for it, that shot of the housing being imploded and the old church left standing, well...that gets my hairs standing up everytime.

In summary, if you've seen the film, try to read the book as it will add to your enjoyment; and if you've read the book, catch the film as they are sufficiently different but both good to enjoy.

reply

I thought the book was excellent, just read it recently. It is more of a straightforward story than the film. It is also more intense and more frightening at moments, especially the end. I did not like the end of the film at all, as it is totally different from the book and not nearly as intense.

I think the film is all right, but I think it is very different, because Wadleigh put his own agendas into the story, and that ended up turning it into a different kind of story. There was no Native American element to the book, nor was there any rich guy who was murdered, who was about to create a huge development in a rundown part of the city. I think those elements took away from the intensity of the original story.

reply

I like the movie very much but the novel in my opinion is forgettable crap.

reply

[deleted]

I finished the book, "The Wolfen," yesterday. I tought it was an excellent light read, far from a classic, but interesting and even thought-provoking at times. However, comparing it to the movie seems pointless. The connections are as superficial as substantive. The most one could say is that the movie is "inspired" by the book.

The characters share some similarities, but differ significantly. The same is true of the plot. And there are no American Indians anywhere. But the biggest difference is in the title creatures. Those in the book are considerably more interesting than those in the movie. And the connection to werewolf and vampire myths is one of the the parts that I found to be thought-provoking. Another is the discussion of the intelligence of the creatures, which cannot speak but can communicate and sense the world around them through smell and sight and hearing to an extraordinary degree.

I have been a fan of the movie since it was released in 1981. That hasn't changed. However, I am now a fan of the book also.


Werewolves Ate My Platoon!

reply


I'm a little half way through the book right now, up to the part were the detective guy is about to leave his apartment and try and hunt one of the creatures down, going to probably finish it tonight...loving it so far. I had seen the movie a few times when I was young...though long in parts..that scene with the rotting hand sticking out of the rubble always chilled me, infact that whole kill scene with that black junkie guy was creepy as hell (had nightmares about it),I will watch the movie again this week as it is on netflix instant.

reply

Well, finished the book, loved it.....just finished watching the movie, did not really care for it. It had its moments, but did not like the changes.

reply

[deleted]

I agree with you. I'd like to see a film that is more faithful to the novel.

reply