In BBT Mayim Bialik argues that Indy's presence is totally irrelevant to the plot of the movie since in the end the Nazis get the ark, open it and die anyway. I think this is a significant writing flaw from a dramaturgical point of view and seriously hurts the Indy character.
She isn't correct. Without Indy, the ark would've never been obtained by the US at the end. So the fate of the ark was still decided by Indy at the end of all.
The US probably didn't even know of the existence of that place, much less that the ark had been taken there. The nazis would've been killed and then a different nazi batallion would've gotten to the island and get ahold of the ark.
Not even close. Without Indy, the Nazi's would have recovered the Ark, even with all of the ones on the island being killed. They still would have had the ark. The point was to keep the ark away from the Nazi's and Indy accomplished that.
If there was no Indy the Nazis would never have found the ark to begin with for them to open it.
That's wrong.
They were digging all over for it with a big crew, at the right site. Sooner or later, they brute force their way into every chamber there, even if they never acquire the correct coordinates.
Indy however...did speed up the process of finding it, probably by weeks. And he prevented Nazis from recovering it after the first calamitous opening. And he saved Marion. And he entertained millions.
Now, this is a signature gun, and that is an optical palm reader.
What's funny is that without INDY the nazis would have likely kept opening the Ark, getting destroyed again and again. Thus INDY may have inadvertently saved Nazi Germany!
First of all The Big Bang Theory is overrated crap. (Had to say it)
It might be overrated, a lot of things get that way once they become popular but it is not crap. You know is crap, that "Back to the Future" movie ughh :)
Second, Toht only got hold of the medallion in order to unearth the Ark because he followed Indy to Marion's in Nepal.
You are correct but once that happens his involvement in the plot is done.
And even if they would have found Marion without Indy, Indy saved her life by been there so he played a part in the plot.
His saving of Marion is not part of the plot, it part of the story but not part of the plot.
reply share
You know is crap, that "Back To The Future" movie ughh
Oooh nice comeback. It's a shame your sentence makes no sense.
but once that happens his involvement in the plot is done
Well it isn't because as others have said all over this board countless times, he was the one who actually unearthed the ark while the Nazis had been digging in the wrong place.
My smile after my back to the future comment was meant to indicate I was just taking a jab and it was not meant as a serious statement. I looked at your post history and just found something you liked.
but once that happens his involvement in the plot is done
Well it isn't because as others have said all over this board countless times, he was the one who actually unearthed the ark while the Nazis had been digging in the wrong place.
The only reason the Nazis were digging in the wrong place was because Toht only had one side of the head piece. They follow Indy to Marion, and he saves her. If he does not save her they get the headpiece and what do they do. They dig in the right place, get the ark, open it and die. Where was Indy in all that? All Indy did was make them dig in the wrong place but they get the ark, open it and die. Nothing Indy did after he saved Marion affected the plot, it just delayed it.
reply share
Except that if they don't follow Indy, they don't get the headpiece in the first place.
I admitted that in an earlier post:
Second, Toht only got hold of the medallion in order to unearth the Ark because he followed Indy to Marion's in Nepal.
You are correct but once that happens his involvement in the plot is done.
Plus you are overlooking the overall theme: preventing the Nazi's from getting the ark in the first place. On that, he was successful.
That is the point tho, by that logic if my goal was to prevent the Yankees from winning the World Series and they lose in the first round of the playoffs would you say I was successful? No, of course you would not.
The key is that at the end the Nazi's had the Ark, Indy failed to prevent them from having it and the only reason it did not end up in Berlin was because Belloq insisted on opening it and when he did they all died.
I still love the movie, listened to it at work today in fact, but it was an eye opener when that was brought up in the show. I thought to myself, "Yea, she has a point there."
"The key is that at the end the Nazi's had the Ark, Indy failed to prevent them from having it". But he did not. Just by being there and survive, Indy assured the fate of the ark. Without him being at the site, the only thing that could've happened is that a different nazi battalion would've gotten ahold of the ark in the following weeks.
He was also suppose to get it for the museum which he failed to do and at first it was suppose to be opened in Berlin in front of Hitler. Just think Indy saved Hitler isnt that wonderful
It would be just as easy to say that the Nazis were irrelevant. Indy sets out to get the Ark. He finds the medallion, finds the Ark, and brings the Ark back to the States. If the Nazis had never shown up, the results would have been the same.
Oh sure, I suppose you could say that Indy wouldn't have known where the city of Tanis was without the Nazis, but if you can dismiss Indy leading the Nazis to the medallion, then you can also dismiss the Nazis leading Indy to Tanis.
Actually, Indy wanted to bring it back for the museum. That was very important to him. But the government men decided to stash it away in a warehouse where nobody would have access to it, so if anyone made all of Indy's efforts irrelevant, it was the USA.