MovieChat Forums > The Prowler (1981) Discussion > The Major Problem With This Film

The Major Problem With This Film


I think this film lacks in character development. If you don't get to know the characters then you don't care when they are slashed to bits. Yes, this film had great gore, but where were the stories behind these characters? Great slashers like Friday the 13th (original), Halloween (original), Prom Night (original) and The House On Sorority Row worked so well because we felt for the characters, and they were involved in stories that built up to their murders. I think this one is just a so-so addition to the slasher genre. Not awful, but not wonderful.

reply

99% of slashers have poor characters. That's what these movies are about weak characters, but made up for with gore and nudity.

Friday the 13th and Prom Night had alright characters for a slasher, Halloween though was solid. But overall if you're looking for great character driven horror, well you're watching the wrong kind of horror movies. That isn't what slashers are about

FULCI LIVES!

reply

I've been a slasher fan since I was a kid (I'm 31 now) so, I don't think I'm watching the wrong kind of films. I'm also a screenwriter and one of the first rules for a successful screenplay, of any genre, is strong character development. Even the worst slasher films that I love, like The Dorm That Dripped Blood and Sleepaway Camp, at least allow you to get to know the characters before they are murdered. I wasn't even sure which character was slashed in the pool in The Prowler. Even though I liked the death scene, it lost it's impact, like most all of them did.

reply

I get that. I'm 29 and been watching since I was a child as well. And I'm working on my debut film.

So I know the deal, but slashers in general aren't known for their characters. Even movies like The Dorm That Dripped Blood and Sleepaway Camp didn't have great characters with depth.

Look at Final Exam it's the typical slasher flick only less gore and nudity. The characters are typical, only difference rather than being killed off right away they're all killed in the last 20 min or so, we spend more time with them, but they are no more developed than any other slasher flick.

The rules of writing are still there in horror, but not as much. I mean seriously when the slasher crae started do you really think the writers, directors and producers said lets make a slasher flick with great characters?

It was more how many hot women can we get nude and what crazy and gory ways can we kill someone. That's the beauty of the slasher flick.

FULCI LIVES!

reply

Yeah, you are right in that some of those movies don't have characters with much depth, but at least they were memorable in some way. I think anyone who has seen Sleepaway Camp will always remember Judy and Meg, and were probably happy when they were killed because they were such bitches. When watching the Prowler, I couldn't even remember the names of the characters that were being murdered. I agree that the writers and directors probably don't care so much about characterization, and I as well like to see how many gory ways people can get killed, but it's much more effective if we get to know them somewhat before it happens. Maybe It's just that I found the characters in the Prowler boring.

reply

Let me get this straight, you said great films with character development and included FRIDAY THE 13th in there? The film where the depth of each character went as far as whether or not they would screw the guy they liked or the guy closest to them...

Halloween and Sleepaway Camp had great characters because it spent alot of time on them. I'm not knocking you or anything but Friday the 13th is known for having huge body counts and cool gore but not for it's characters. Let's face it, the average life span of a character in the first 4 films is roughly 5 to 8 minutes of screen time. They got better with characters as they went on but originally they didn't.

I do agree though with you on Prowler, they didn't have any characters nor did the film really seem to have any story. Very low body count actually and the film is very slow. If you look at it, not a whole lot happens except for them walking around doing searching for things with false cheap scares. I felt Savini's work was decent but nothing ground breaking in this, still think his best work is DAY OF THE DEAD.

Another problem I had with this film is the fact that I never really found the killer to be very scary. He had all the potential to be, cool outfit, nasty weapons, a creepy mask but everytime I saw him on screen he never scared me. We never got a sense of what he was capable of nor did we ever figure out how malevolent he could be. I also didn't get if the killer was just another guy (sheriff) or if the sheriff was actually the guy from the beginning.

reply

Talk about over-analyzing something where there is really no analysis to be sought. Great character development in Friday the 13th? Hell, even Halloween, which has arguably the best character development of any slasher, still has piss poor character development, and I never gave a *beep* if the guy in the sheet lived or died.

The thing is, when you go to watch a slasher, you're looking for cool deaths, and in certain instances (such as The Prowler) cool gore. If you're looking for anything more, go watch some good psychological horror, like Stir of Echoes or something. You're looking in the wrong place if you pine for character development in any movie directed by Joseph Zito.

reply


It is evident that character did not even register on the give a damn meter of the writer and director, and I agree some depth (any depth!!) would have helped the film.

All you need to see is the shower pitchfork/big boobs scene to get what the filmmakers were going for- pure exploitation. I happen to love the film due mainly to the location which I know quite well from many vacations.


------------------------------------

>>>Go die.>>>

reply

the bozos and boobs are there yo sliced and diced in every friday film.In eight films not once do learn about one person dislikes,beliefs,faith,family etc.

reply

I agree that many slashers lack character development.. I think Black Christmas has the best character development I have ever seen in a slasher..

reply

"I think Black Christmas has the best character development I have ever seen in a slasher.. "

Indeed, and that's a gigantic part of why that one works so well.

People go on and on about how much character development Halloween has, how well drawn the characters are, etc. Like it's a Chekov play. Just because we spend seemingly endless amounts of time with those characters doesn't mean they're developed or three dimensional.

Personally, I think one of the strengths of The Prowler is it's economy. It's pared down style definitely helps the pace of the film, the building tension of the stalk and slash sequences, etc. It's to the detriment of any true character development, sure, but this isn't a movie about getting your heart broken because you've fallen in love with the co-ed knife fodder. It's just supposed to be a white knuckle tense slasher movie and on those grounds, it delivers. How much do people really want to get to know any of these characters? Their hopes, their dreams, their secret longings? It doesn't effect what this kind of movie does. Usually, attempts to do that ring hollow and disingenuine, or have a reverse effect. Spend too much time with a character (Jamie Lee Curtis in Halloween, Neve Campbell in Scream) and you start rooting for the killer to just shut them the hell up.

It falls to an actor to make a character likeable or relatable with limited amounts of material - but slasher flicks, even the best ones, are roller coaster rides. And to further the analogy, if the car (the protagonist) is solid then the ride (movie) is a blast. But you don't always want to spend two-thirds of the ride getting a feel for the car, and if you do it too much you might start to see some serious cracks and the ride becomes a whole other kind of scary.

There's a place for character study horror, but it doubles back on itself in several ways in slasher movies. For one, there are always a lot of red herring characters that need to be a little ambiguous. You don't want to over write that, it tips your hand one way or another. Same goes for who ends up actually being the killer - you don't want to do anything that indicates anyone one way or the other when the crux of your story is predicated on the mystery element. There are graceful ways to write good character moments minimalistically, but it's a tightrope walk not to alienate your audience by giving too much away or destroying the pace. You run the risk of the material becoming parodic. Give every character a profound arc and it's a soap opera, and that's even worse than thin characters.

This is one genre where a lack of character development isn't necessarily a minus. It can actually be used to finesse a plot or mislead the audience. I've found that if you make a character likeable, just likeable, it works better than dramatically dimensional or complex. Some of the finest instances of this occur in what are ostensibly labeled horror comedies, because if somebody's funny, they're often endearing. And if the horror is cranked as high as the comedy - it's hard to take the hit when a funny character bites it. I know it's a weird example, but Club Dread pulled it off really well. You don't need well rounded development to become attached to a character and feel for them. And if the movie is technically well done (like I thought The Prowler was) then you can't help but get wrapped up in the tension and that should make you emotionally involved.

reply

The characters are either boring as hell, or you ARE right and character development is even worse in this film than all the others. I say it's both.

Seriously this movie had great gore but wow, 2 scenes of it? I only gave it a 3, complete waste of money.

Mum & Dad 8/10
The Living and the Dead 6/10
Nail Gun Massacre 4/10
Martyrs 10/10

reply

The problem I had with this movie is that certain scenes are very slowly paced. There's scenes where the main character and the deputy are walking around a deserted house, or a graveyard, and they just go on forever, with little suspense or any kind of dread. They're just directed in a boring style. If you look at the director's next film, Friday the 13th The Final Chapter, it's much more fast-paced and dynamic. I think the Prowler is an okay film, but could be much better. It had the potential to be a lot more memorable. The actors are all very appealing.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

My problem was that it had absolutely no pacing whatsoever and the motivation for the maniac is never really explained (yes, we no why he killed two characters in the beginning, but why did he suddenly decide to take it up again decades latter?) Instead of explaining this, the movie decides that showing people walk and incorporating pointless subplot upon pointless subplot is a far more productive use of time.

reply

Prom Night is not a good slasher movie, in fact the Prowler is a much better film overall.

Don't put the devil in the picture, cause' the religious groups won't wanna see it.

reply