MovieChat Forums > Peter and Paul (1981) Discussion > It should have been retitled 'Paul and P...

It should have been retitled 'Paul and Peter'


Casting-wise I thought Anthony Hopkins as Paul chewed a lot of scenery. And

they should have gotten a more formidable actor to portray Peter.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

*** Bumping an old thread ***

As for the title, the movie is accurate in portraying the book of Acts in which Paul gets more airtime than Peter.

I think they both were good, though Hopkin's Paul is not quite as I usually imagine him (but that's a discussion for another day).

reply