MovieChat Forums > Evilspeak (1982) Discussion > Wow, those were some mismatched hooters....

Wow, those were some mismatched hooters...


.....in Lynn Hancock's shower scene. An A-cup and a B-Cup!

reply

I have to agree and wonder why on earth she opted for this scene.

reply

They're not that bad, sure one is slightly bigger then the other, but it's not horrible.

"wonder why on earth she opted for this scene?"

Easy, nudity equals more money.

reply


It was probably the position of her arms.


**SPOILER ALERT**



The character has her entrails torn out and devoured by some evil pigs and all you could think about was her "mismatched hooters"? Jeesh!













If you love and support Michael Jackson 100%, copy & paste this into your signature. We love MJ!

reply



Awesome thread.

And, um, she had more 'going on' for her than just her hooters...

------

Wait a minute... who am I here?

reply


The character has her entrails torn out and devoured by some evil pigs and all you could think about was her "mismatched hooters"? Jeesh!


True but that is one of those "blink and you miss it" scenes. I found that scene to be hilarious honestly. You don't actually see her being torn apart. All that happens is her screaming with some fake blood on her chest and a very fake pig head "attacking" her. Just that 2 second shot of a pig pulling a very rubbery intestine from a very fake body.

Overall I found this movie weird and not scary.

Long live the 70's!

reply

The pig tears off a thick piece of fake skin from the victim "dummy", not any intestines, although the stomach cavity is then exposed.

reply

The pig tears off a thick piece of fake skin from the victim "dummy", not any intestines, although the stomach cavity is then exposed.

reply

That means the gal's breasts are without augmentation. In reality, breasts are not alike; they're never identical/symmetrical. Just sayin'.

reply

Sometimes they are. "Never" is dumb. If they are random, they will occasionally be the same size by coincidence. My wife's seem like that.

-ClintJCL
http://clintjcl.wordpress.com/category/reviews/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/clintjcl

reply

If you say so, Clint. 😉 The medical world seems to disagree with you. Not to worry. Have a nice day.

reply

Nope. Although it's true that most natural breasts are different in size, from subtle to substantial, this actress's boobs are also horribly misshapen.

The right one is nearly a cylinder, with a very flat front surface and sides that curve upward in an arc, and the left one is a weird misshapen cone.

This girl had some very, very bad breast augmentation which looked fine when all packed into a bra or bathing suit, but was really horrific when let loose.

She is from a time when augmentation was not at its highest quality yet, and many surgeons were just taking money and doing a bad job.

I have no idea why she thought doing a nude scene in a relatively mainstream movie was a good idea, she truly looked deformed.

reply

And saggy / oddly shaped to boot... I was more grossed out by her boobs than any of the gore, lol.

reply

Wouldn't say "no" to either of them. Making out with this girl would be like freestyle juggling...

reply

[deleted]

I actually didn't notice any mismatching, I was just weirded out by the shape of her right breast because the camera angle gave a better look at the profile of that one. Sharp boob, would still bang. She's a pretty, white haired old lady now.

reply