MovieChat Forums > Superman II (1981) Discussion > Superman II's Donner Cut Explained: Bigg...

Superman II's Donner Cut Explained: Biggest Changes To The 1980 Movie


https://screenrant.com/superman-2-richard-donner-cut-differences-changes-explained/

Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut features some pretty big changes from the original 1980 movie. Christopher Reeves' Superman: The Movie is a classic, and given how big of a hit the 1978 film was, it's no surprise that Warner Bros. ordered a sequel; however, production on that second film was marred by controversies and other difficulties. As a result, Superman II was the product of two different directors: Richard Donner — who directed the first Superman — began production on the film, but was eventually replaced by Richard Lester.

Following the success of the 1976 film The Omen, Donner was hired to direct Superman: The Movie and its sequel, which would be filmed simultaneously; however, personality conflicts arose between Donner and the producers, father-son duo Alexander and Ilya Salkind, and Pierre Spengler. Once filming began, tensions continued to rise, prompting the producers to bring in Richard Lester to "co-produce" the film. Things got so bad that Donner was eventually told to forget about filming anything more for Superman II and just finish up the first film. When Superman: The Movie proved to be a hit, production on the sequel resumed — with Lester at the helm. Despite the fact that Donner had filmed about 70 percent of the sequel, Lester reshot much of the film and radically changed the tone and several sequences.

Although Lester's version of the film was also a hit, in the years following the release of Superman II, there was growing interest in seeing Donner's version — especially with the introduction of DVDs and the trend of re-releasing films as extended or director's cuts. In the early 2000s, a fan campaign began asking Warner Bros. to restore Donner's vision for Superman II for the 25 year anniversary. Unfortunately, Warner Bros. initially was unable to do so because of various reasons. Marlon Brando had sued the studio over royalties, so his likeness could not be used. Donner had never completed filming, and it wasn't possible at that point to film more. Furthermore, Donner had no interest in being involved [via IGN]. However, circumstances changed, and in 2006, the studio released the "Donner Cut" on DVD.

As the Donner Cut was being assembled, the attempt was made to restore as much of Donner's original vision for Superman as possible by using the footage that was already shot. Some of Lester's footage was needed to make a coherent story to fill in the gaps, as well as a screen test and even a sequence from the first movie. The end result is that Superman II: The Donner Cut is not quite a finished film. Instead, it's an interesting look at "what might have been" that features several major differences from the film released in theaters.

reply

What were the differences?

reply

I haven't seen it but I do know some of the alternate scenes.
The Paris scene isn't present in the Donner Cut. This is gonna be a long one. Basically Donner wanted Superman 1 to end with him getting both missiles at once and not with Superman reversing time. So his cut of Superman 2 starts with him throwing both missiles into Outer space and freeing Zod, Ursa, and Nom.

Another alternate scene is Lois shooting Clark Kent with a gun at their hotel room in Niagra Falls to prove he is Superman instead of him tripping on the pink bear rug.

Also Marlon Brando is in the movie as Superman's father instead of his mom in the scene where he chooses to get rid of his powers.

And another huge difference is Superman reverses time at the end so neither the memory erasing kiss or the scene with him apologizing to the President is in Donner's Cut of the film. Yeah. Donner only wanted the Superman turning back time to be in the 2nd one.

reply