One of those special movies


I'll never forget when and where I saw this movie at. 1980 in Toledo, Oh. I was with my aunt and girlfriend. You can call this movie one of my guilty pleasure. Frank was great in it.

reply

Frank was great, but the whole Faye Dunaway subplot very was poorly done and the ending sucked.

I kept wondering why Frank didn't get a new doctor for his wife since the guy was so obviously incompetent.

reply

It wasn't perfect, but The First Deadly Sin was very good, IMO. Yes the Dunaway "subplot" was, perhaps, ill-conceived, but not "poorly handled." On the contrary, I think all involved done as much as they could with a part of the story that may have been better trimmed or even omitted. However, we do see the strains of his wife's condition bearing down upon Delaney and that's the heart of this story -- in fact, we could even consider this the main part of the film and the murder case the subplot. Reason being, that it's the killer's activities that keeps Delaney occupied as his wife's condition worsens and he nears retirement. He could have bowed out early, spent time sitting at the hospital but he filled his days almost obsessing over the ice-pick killer. That was his distraction and if the ending is bleak, it didn't "suck." I found it quite moving.

NOW TARZAN MAKE WAR!

reply

I didn't even think the Faye Dunaway angle was ill conceived, much less poorly handled. I appreciate the fact that this film portrays an aging detective distracted by his wife's illness. Too often cops have no personal lives in films – they're on the job 24/7 – and this one personalizes him and shows the challenges he is facing professionally and domestically.

The "cop about to retire" bit has become cliche today, but I don't think it was as tired in 1980. And bleak endings are a part of life, and while that may "suck," the film doesn't "suck" for portraying this.

reply

Ok I'm agree, Frank Sinatra delivered a fine performance considering the poor screenplay he was given. Having said that, the movie is boring as hell. The snail-pace is not the problem per se. I like slow paced thrillers when in fact the "thriller" contains some "thrills", but TFDS contains NONE whatsoever.
Besides don't forget the rule #1 of any cop thriller: The weaker the villain, the crappier the movie is. And which villain is weaker than David Dukes' character? C'mon! 'Daniel Blank' has to be one of the most lame villains ever.
Finally Faye Dunaway was completely wasted in this film. She has only a handful of lines and everything she does is looking worse each time we get to see her. Talking about unnecesary characters.
TFDS feels and looks like a cheapo TV movie. It's nothing more than just another crummy vigilante flick.

reply

[deleted]