MovieChat Forums > Don't Go in the House (1980) Discussion > Strongest scene of violence...EVER!

Strongest scene of violence...EVER!


I just rewatched this movie after not having seen it for years and years because I always thought it was too repugnant. But on closer observation, I realized that the film has only one graphic scene (the girl and the blowtorch and the metal room), and it's done so effectivly that it haunts you for the rest of the movie and leaves its stamp on the viewer like no other single scene. It's an amazing feat to film a scene so powerful that it twists the whole movie and my recollection of it around that one moment.

reply

I agree I was 9 yrs old when i saw this film, and that scene really disturbed me.

reply

Did it mess you up for life?

reply

not quite! I think my part time serial killer persona did that.

reply

You saw it at the age of 9???? I saw it at 18 and was thoroughly disgusted. It still haunts me today--over 20 years later! You must have nerves of steel to have gotten through that at that young an age.

reply

I saw it at 18 and thought it was wickedcool.

Still do, have the special edition dvd and everything.

reply

i just saw it on youtube. iam in my 30's and had a bad dream after seeing this scene. imagine that... and naked too. thats the worst.. very disturbing scene. 1980 also had maniac which was violent... low budget horror films around 1980-81 were reallly violent

reply

you guys let me down. i read through this and thought i was going to vomit if i saw it. i just watched it and..well..i wasn't impressed. i guess ichi the killer will desensitize anyone though.

I hear that they recently added more hops.

reply

[deleted]

but for 1980 , it was cutting edge...

reply

yeah but cannibal ferox feels forced

I hear that they recently added more hops.

reply

The cum scene was certainly real :S

reply

Ichi wasn't embarrassing. It was a manga

reply

is this the scene in question guys ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDdXNiZqLQI&feature=related

Didn't think it was anything remarkable to be honest !!!!

reply

Yeah that's it, but in the original film you can see her chest clearly--they just cropped them out to get it on youtube. For 1980 that was pretty shocking.

reply

Meh. I just watched it. Certainly sick but nothing outrageous. Then again, I'm a desensitized viewer. Some day I'll watch the film in its entirety. Oh yeah, that girl needed dental braces.

reply

I saw it when it came out and back then it was pretty strong. But it HAS been topped by crap like the Hostel movies.

reply

I'm not sure "topped" is the right words for bottom-feeders like the "Hostel" flicks, but they are certainly more graphic. On the other hand, I found this film a lot more disturbing because of the abrupt changes in tone. With the "Hostel" variety, I expected to be assaulted – and I am. The scene of the killer wielding the torch while wearing the fire-proof suit was especially disturbing.

reply

OK--good point:) But that scene in "Don't..." still bothers me a LOT more than anything in "Hostel" or "Hostel 2"...but they're both utter trash too.

reply

To be honest, I haven't seen either of the "Hostels" yet, but I think I have the second one in a pile somewhere, where it will probably stay until I get the first. But there's something very monotonous about the torture trend in recent horror films. At least this one has disco and the passage of 30 years to make it "safer."

reply

I can go down the list and check off all the shockers that are on all the usual "most disturbing" lists like "Martyrs" "Inside" "Salo" "Chaos" "I Stand ALone" the "Hostel" flms, etc. I'm no novice when it comes to horror films, or films that gain notoriety for their horrific scenes.

I'd been putting this one off for a while, because it's reputation preceeds it quite loudly, especially in regard to this scene with the poor florist. I finally got around to watching it last week and, yes, the scene is still in my head. I think it is so unsettling because the build up to it is paced so well. We get to see the florist get stranded in a pretty *beep* situation that inevitably leads to her demise. And, after she's introduced, it takes a couple scenes to get there, even though we know it's coming. Plus, she's aware of what the killer has in store for such a long period of time before she actually gets it. She wakes up (naked, totally exposed/on display), she's doused in gasoline, and then there is that terrifying image from her POV as she sees the flame thrower starting to glow and then getting brighter until the flames shoot out. Then there's that steel room. It's all like a bad nightmare. Unlike a lot of sleaze and gore shockers (especially as of late), it's not relying on the special effects but the actual premise. It's a terrifying idea and executed really well.

Make it through all that and you're rewarded with one of the best disco scenes ever filmed!

"IMDB: Where 14 year olds can pretend to be jaded, 40 year old movie critics."

reply

I've been there. It's when Kathy (The florist) misses her bus, and Donald offers Kathy 'a lift' before the outside bums want to take her. Of course, Donald sees that Kathy looks like his 'mother', so he plans to lure her by fibbing about his mother being sick and bought flowers, and faking a phone call to 'the medics' until Kathy was tired of his and demanded to call a cab. That's when Kathy was hit, and you see her in the steel room, like you said, in all her nakedness...even a little bush there, too.

reply

Agreed. That one scene is incredibly nasty and upsetting.

I'm a totally bitchin' bio writer from Mars!

reply

Back when this movie was made I would agree with your statement but in light of all the gorefests and torture porn garbage that's available today that scene is relatively tame.

And, unlike the bucket o' blood "horror" movies of today, that movie used character development and suspense to deliver the goods. I mean that guy was really messed in the head because of what his mother did to him as a child.

This scene was the only murder we see on screen but it was delivered with great shock value as well as a sense of impending doom for the poor victim. Instead of just being strapped to a chair and having extremities chopped/sawed/bitten off, there is an intense build up in her final moments where she (and we the audience) know her death is imminent.

That method of delivery is why this scene will stick with me for life.

reply

What made these films of that period so disturbing was that this was a time of a LOT of crime, inflation, post-Watergate depression and so on, and the media had just started to put a lot of focus on serial killers and how crime was everywhere and so on. There had been a number of assassinations of high profile figures, there had been heavily covered stories of sick killers (Manson, Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy,etc.), and there was a lot of focus in society on the "lone nut"/"loner psycho" types. Also, a hot idea among psycho-therapists in the 70s was that violence had a sexual connotation, with apparently studies that showed that men who committed acts of violence were aroused by it and so on. These kinds of subjects left people paranoid and sleepless. Urban dwellers thought the world was going to absolute hell. Indeed, if you were in NYC in the late 70s-early 80s, there was crime, drugs, filth, trash, sex shops,porn theaters, hookers, etc. all over Broadway and 42nd. Street.

Then, here comes these types of films, that were really very violent (not always but sometimes very gory), and featured women being tortured, raped, mutilated, terrified, and murdered.

It's not that a film like "Don't Go in the House", "Nightmare", or "Maniac" is scary like a traditional horror film, but that they are disturbing and unsettling because they are told from the KILLER'S point of view. Rather than a scary monster man like Freddy or Jason or even Michael Myers, or a zombie or monster of some sort, these guys seem like REAL people. There are humanized, and we spend more time with them than we do with the victims. We are taken inside of their twisted, private world. They seem like normal guys in public, then seem like monsters when they're home at night. The fact that we actually sympathize/identify with them as people at all makes it even MORE disturbing, and moreso because the films are asking us to do that.

In this film, just as you get to know and feel bad for Donny, then he does something horrible. And that scene in the steel room that everyone talks about was, indeed, VERY disturbing for its time. The savagery with which he flings open the door and then slams it alone is quite upsetting.

I saw this film, "Nightmare", and several other of those types of films in the theater in 1980, and I saw "Maniac" in a theater in 1981. Other films like that include the ultra controversial "Silent Night, Deadly Night" from 1984, and "The Driller Killer" from 1979.

Today's "Hostel" type movies may be a lot more gory and, frankly, quite silly, but they lack the edge these films had. These don't seem so rough to younger people now because, as someone else said, they seem dated and of their time now, and so the kids have a generation of seperation so that they don't identify with this material as strongly (they're laughing at the disco clothes and such). But, trust me, in 1979 or 1980 or 1981, if you went to the theater and saw these films, you'd feel nervous when you went home...

reply

[deleted]

Honestly, I didn't really think that much of it.

reply

Yeah. I mean, the scene is pretty gnarly. It's done well enough (super-imposed fire aside). It just...isn't all that terrifying, repulsive or mentally scarring. Everything Donny does is repulsive, obviously, but...that's sort of expected in a film like this.

reply

It's depressing tone of the movie that's disturbing, not the graphic scenes themselves. There's what, like one graphic scene? Two if we count the other guy being burned at the end, but it's just a regular fire stunt, nothing special (like the girl scene)

reply