Worst casting ever


This film was in large part ruined for me by the ridiculous casting of Art Garfunkel in the lead role. As an actor he makes a great singer. His bony physicality, his vacuous expressions, his attempts at emotion were all embarrassing. It was a curious choice for director Nicolas Roeg to make. In Criterion's DVD 'extras,' Theresa Russell says she had to 'lead' Garfunkel through a lot of the film. It shows.

It also didn't help to listen to Harvey Keitel and imagine he must have been the only Viennese police inspector in history who was born and brought up in Brooklyn. His accent is straight off the streets of Noo Yawk. Keitel could have at least TRIED to sound like an Austrian.

These two casting choices were most peculiar and were serious detriments to the film as a whole. Theresa Russell, for me, saved the film, all the more remarkable because she was only 22 years old at the time.

reply

[deleted]

I think you're right: Garfunkel ideally suited what Roeg was looking for. I can't think of another good reason. But I suspect it wasn't what the audience was looking for. It is hard to identify with such an empty 'cretin' (your word), and, worse, an empty 'cretin' who can't act. There are a lot of good actors out there who would have been provided a far more convincing performance than Garfunkel, who, mercifully, has not appeared in a film (to my knowledge) in a long time.

I think Keitel is indeed a terrific actor -- in the right role. I'm one of those 'language' or 'accent' people, and to me he sounded silly trying to portray a Vienna police inspector while his words were coming straight out of Brooklyn. I'm very surprised that the estimable Nicolas Roeg didn't seem to care about this.

reply

I don't know why anyone would want to find identification in an emotionally empty cretin. Roeg's films I believe don't have that quality about them, which is one thing that attracts me to them.

[inject cathexis]

reply

groggo: In the Inspector's office at home, the camera briefly zooms into a wall where several degrees and certificates are hung; one of these is a degree from Harvard. I always took this as an implication that Netusil had spent a lot of time in the States. My personal feeling is that he was born in Austria but raised in America, which would explain the lack of an Austrian accent.

reply

Astute observation of the Harvard degree. I noticed it as well. Too bad there was not more back story with Keitel being portrayed as another transplanted American. I never saw him as being Austrian during the entire film.

One of the problems with casting Art Garfunkel is that to me, he has no sex appeal. However, I am not a woman and it is not outside the realm of possibility that the Theresa Russell character could be attracted to him. That being said, this viewer found their erotic scenes together to lack chemistry.

The saving grace of the casting decisions was the performance of the 21 years old at the time, Miss Russell. Her performance was a Tour de force. That being said, this aficionado liked her character in "Straight Time" much better. As a matter of fact, it is one of my very favorite portrayals of a young, almost impossibly beautiful and unselfconsciously desirable woman of any movie I have seen.

reply

"Lacks chemestry" to say the least. On the bright side, the idea that this guy could get so much grade A sex in two hours of movie time provides hope for all guys.

reply

Lol

reply

Exactly the point that during filmmaking, a director (and other crew, and really the actors as well) ought to catch something like that and say "Hey, when this hits the audience, they're gonna wonder about that accent, so maybe just one line here and one line over in this scene, and we can cover it." It was a miss.

Also a miss: Garfunkel. OP (and others) covered it. Not that he has to be some crazy-sexy goodbody male-model type, or even have the Keitel going. But Garfunkel isn't even convincing as a blandish schlemiel, really. As somebody pointed out earlier, he seems out of his element, not part of any film universe, unreal even when the character demands nothing in particular. (And that's coming from somebody who likes him as a singer and a person.)

Agreed re Theresa Russell, for sure. She did what she could, anyway.

Just a side note:

At Sundance in 1991, I happened to be in the crowd waiting outside the Egyptian for Ms. Russell and the other panelists (a group that was supposed to include Ken Russell as well) to arrive before they'd let us in for seating for the premiere. I have never said this about any celebrity before, simply because it hasn't been true of the rare actors, directors, etc. that I've run across, but as Ms. Russell walked in I was about 12 feet or so away, and she was kind of scanning the crowd, and for two or three full seconds she locked eyes (with me, I mean) and did that smile she does. Probably didn't mean a thing, of course, but just for a second I felt like a side of bacon, because...you know, it's that look. Probably looks that way at her dog or the paint on the wall, too. But anyway. (It should be said that a couple of people in front of me turned around with that how-does-she-know-your-sorry-a$s look. I just tried to look like a satellite part of the entourage or something.)

So anyhow, I was somewhat predisposed to root for the film, as you kind of are anyway at these festivals; you tend to look for the good rather than getting all obsessed with imperfections. You're rooting for people and films to do well if they're any good at all.

Then we went in...and it was a disaster. One "funny" line after another landed like a body hitting the pavement, not a laugh in the place. I sat behind Cheech Marin, who turned to whoever he was sitting with at one point during the film and said "Man, this thing sucks, man." Ken Russell was conveniently indisposed and "delayed" with some other film, so he wasn't there for the panel as scheduled -- so poor Theresa, I think the screenwriter, and one or two other crew (an assistant director was one of them, I think, or maybe a second-unit director) were left to defend it. I actually felt terrible for all of them, especially for Ms. Russell, who definitely was going to call me after the whole debacle was over, or something. But seriously...it was bad. At some point you realize these are just people who put out an artistic product and hope it's good, and they look so much smaller and more vulnerable in real life, and it just kind of kills you when they swing for the fences and it bombs publicly. It can't be an easy life sometimes.

Regardless of that film, though, she does have that thing. (I think so much of it is in the voice, probably.) Anybody who saw the lurid but still interesting noir Black Widow (with Debra Winger) will understand what she can do for a film. ("Lurid" is not even remotely a criticism of that film, btw; it's sort of the tonal point of the film, actually.)



reply

The film you saw at Sundance is Whore, right?

reply

Right. (One of the ones I saw that year, anyway.)

So your next question is something like this: What is this anecdote doing on a discussion thread for Bad Timing?

My question too. I have no idea. I'll look into it. I don't know how this happened, actually.

reply

groggo, I understand your point regarding Theresa Russell having to 'lead' Garfunkel around; however, I believe it makes Alex the character he is supposed to be. Alex is not a strong character (at least not when it comes to living spontaneously or having wild sex with the unpredictable Milena). If Art Garfunkel was a more assertive (and trained) actor, I don't think Alex's character would work as well. Milena and Alex play off of each other as the movie plays out. Alex actually becomes much stronger as Milena loses her control over him.

You'll have to excuse my wording tonight. I'm tired! I really wanted to comment because I love this movie so much.

Knowledge is Power - Sir Francis Bacon

reply

Yeah. I loved the style of the film and found it very intriguing, but was definitely put off a bit by Garfunkle's casting. He wasn't terrible, but he was serviceable at best and Roeg could've found someone much better. He also has zero sex appeal - I actually found him pretty repulsive, I'm sorry to say - so for a film largely about sex that was something of a mood-kill (and it just isn't believable that she'd be so attracted to him). It's a shame, it ends up an 8/10 for me when it could've been more.


That is a masterpiece of understatement.

reply

If someone could do magical CGI by taking out Theresa Russell and replacing her with any moderately competent actress, the film would be much better.

reply

Whaa?

I gotta say, reading this and how the majority agrees with you is rather disappointing -- of course, in my honest opinion.

I found the character, Alex Linden, played by Art, quite attractive and captivating. I have to admit, I am strongly attracted to nerdy, weak looking males and my god, Art in his younger years, in this movie, meow. I even happened to meet someone who bears a striking resemblance to him. Totally banged that, anywho:

Art's acting in this movie was the epitome of what Alex's characteristics are. He is a weak, fragile man meets his polar opposite, which intrigues him; leading him to a spiraling obsession.

I agree what milena_1971 said:

... I believe it makes Alex the character he is supposed to be. Alex is not a strong character (at least not when it comes to living spontaneously or having wild sex with the unpredictable Milena). If Art Garfunkel was a more assertive (and trained) actor, I don't think Alex's character would work as well. Milena and Alex play off of each other as the movie plays out. Alex actually becomes much stronger as Milena loses her control over him.


I eat and drink out of measuring cups because that is the only dish that rarely gets used.

reply

Very nice post. I agree with ZeeBiscuit.

reply

I thought Garfunkel and Keitel bought great intensity to their roles. Garfunkel embodied well a disturbed cerebral and with Keitel we can sense the murderousness beneath his inquisitor role.

He kicked me right in the middle of my daily routine

reply

agreed

reply