MovieChat Forums > Shogun (1980) Discussion > Remake possibilities?

Remake possibilities?


I saw the original series as a child. Recently I read the novel and absolutely fell in love with it. A remake would be very interesting. I think Guy Pearce would make a great Anjin-san.

reply

The way that Hollywood is today they would mess it up.

They shouldn't remake everything.

reply

remake only on Japan with Japanese and English producers. Don't let the yanks touch it, they'll mess it up.

reply

Peter Jackson of Lord of the Rings fame wouldn't mess it up. It would be a dream come true if he made it into a three-part epic just like LOTR. And he isn't American

There'd be a problem with the languages though. English, Japanese, Portuguese, Latin and Spanish are spoken. It would be good if Japanese was subtitled, and the other languages spoken as English, with Latin infused with "thous" and "thees" so you can tell the difference.

Problem is, I don't think the audiences will like subtitles. Also the lack of a big battle makes it tough to sell

reply

More reason not to remake it. Shogun is one of those mini series that you just don't remake.

reply

LOTR and Shogun are like apples and oranges. Shogun depended on drama, not CGI battles, sweeping landscapes and grandiose proportions. Sure, Shogun is an epic too but this epic is more character oriented. We are watching this for Blackthorne, Torinaga, Mariko, Rodrigues, Alvarez and the other characters, not just for the scenery. This is what an epic was like back in the 80s. However, today, most fanboys are spoiled by CGI and 40 minute battle scenes, so I'm sure that Shogun seems much too talky for them to regard as an epic in its own right.

reply

Nonsense, how many huge hits have thier been that were shot with subtitles?

You're right though, for the sake of ease I think it would be better to stick to the three languages i.e. Japenese, English and Latin (not a great deal of Latin in there after all) and just allow the Potuguese to slip away unnoticed.

If it bleeds, we can kill it.

reply

This story just fell apart after Mariko died. Clavell just didn't know how to end his story, he was at a complete lose. And Eric Bercovici didn't know how to close the movie either.
I felt that the ending ruin the whole story. It wasn't the fact that Mariko was killed off, it's the fact that Clavell didn't know what to do with the main characters after she died. The time line was also so-what lost in this book. In 1587 Hideyoshi prohibited Christianity and expelled Jesuit missionaries from Japan. In 1588 he won from all daimyo a pledge of allegiance to the emperor and to himself.
Around 1600 to 1603 Tokugawa Ieyasu established trade relations with the English and Dutch, but he became wary of Christianity. He was aware of the conflict between Catholics and Protestants in Europe, and he was aware of Jesuits in Japan trying to expel Franciscans and the Dutch. He was annoyed by Christian aggressiveness and saw the Spanish and Portuguese administration of Christianity in Japan as a dangerous political machine. In 1614 he outlawed Christianity. All European priests were ordered to gather at Nagasaki for deportation. Christian churches were ordered destroyed, and Japanese converts were ordered to renounce their Christianity.
Also remember the story shogun was based on Will Adams, who never talk to a woman, but a man who could speak Portuguese. The priest want Tokugawa to kill him out right, but he refused.
Also the survivors of the Liefde were also rewarded with favours and even allowed to pursue foreign trade. Most of the original crew were able to leave Japan in 1605 with the help of the daimyo of Hirado. Although Adams did not himself receive permission to leave Japan until 1613, Melchior van Santvoort, together with another crewman, Jan Joosten van Lodensteijn, engaged in trade between Japan and Southeast Asia and reportedly made a fortune. Both of them were reported by Dutch traders in Ayutthaya, onboard richly cargoed junks, in early 1613.

reply

Since the original premiered I haven't seen it and I'm now watching it in HD. It holds up beautifully. It's amazing how wonderful it still looks.

reply

Your critical analysis, while probably very accurate, bored me to tears. Clavell wrote what he wrote. It was fiction. They filmed fiction. That's it.

reply

That's because your a very boring person, just ask your wife

reply

Number one: Your grammar is incorrect. Number two: I am only engaged, not yet married therefore I have no wife. Number three: You are a potato head.

reply

I completely agree with you. They would hack up the script, set it in Germany, make Hitler Lord Toranagaleitter, and just generally screw it up. Besides, it would cost prohibitive.

reply

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2788316/?ref_=nm_flmg_wr_1It's planned for Fox.

--
If I cannot smoke cigars in heaven, I shall not go!

reply

Why would you want to remake it? Do you think the mini-series isn't good enough?

Personally I do not think that Shogun needs to be remade. It is perfect as it is. No need for a remake.

If you're going to do it as a movie it would only lose, because you'd have to squeeze the whole story into 2 - 3 hours and as a mini series for TV it would probably be too expensive.

reply

[deleted]

I liked the MS too, but I would remake it because it needs to be made far longer, so that more of the book is included.

reply

I saw the series on TV when it first appeared, and loved it. Now, I'm watching it again on DVD, it is still a great series, but the pacing is so slow compared with todays standards.

If a remake is made, I would love to see faster pacing, and also a more multithreaded storytelling. Instead of seeing the entire story from John Blackthorns POV, I would prefer a structure like '24' where we follow the events from the POV of several characters. I want to see more of the actions of the Jezuiets, Toranaga, Ishido, Yabu, and also the relationship between Mariko and her husband.

reply

at the end of the book there is a note that says {Quote}that year at dawn on the 21st day of the 10th month without gods, the main armies clashed. it was in the mountains near Sekigahara, astride the north road, the weather foul-fog, then sleet. By late afternoon Toranaga had won the battle and the slaughter began. Forty thousand heads were taken.

3 days later Ishido was captured alive and Toranaga gentially reminded him of the prophecy and sent him in chains to Osaka for public veiwning, ordering the eta to plant the gereral lord Ishidos feet firm in the earth, with only his head outside the earth, and to invire passersby to saw at the most famous neck in the realm witha bamboo saw. Ishido lingered for 3 days and died very old.

I think that this would be a great way to end a movie giving the huge battle that Clavell did not write but a little poetic licence I think would be valid I think

reply

Hey, Kirsty, have you seen Goemon? It's a manga-based fantasy with lots of wire-work and CGI, but Hideyoshi, Ishida, Nobunaga, Tokugawa and all are featured and we do get to see the battle of Segikahara. Not at all realistic, but rather fun, worth seeing.

reply

[deleted]

If you want a remake, just watch Last Samurai. It's basically plagerised, a outsider learns to love Japan, becomes accepted, and helps train their military.

Granted, it's not nearly as good as the series, but it should be close enough to settle people's desires for a remake.

reply

With a big difference though.

Last Samurai is based on a Frenchman (Jules Brunet iirc, he was later a general or somesuch in the french army) who was in Japan helping Tokugawa Yoshinobu (the last of the Tokugawa Shoguns) to modernise the army. After the emperor reclaimed power and the supporters of the Shogunate withdrew to Hokkaido and declared the Republic of Ezo, this Frenchman went with them and helped them in the fight.

reply

"If you want a remake, just watch Last Samurai. It's basically plagerised, a outsider learns to love Japan, becomes accepted, and helps train their military."

The film's plot is very loosely based on the 1877 Satsuma Rebellion led by Saigo Takamori, and also on the story of Jules Brunet, a French army captain who fought alongside Enomoto Takeaki in the Boshin War. The roles of Britain and France are largely portrayed as US actions, and characters in the film and the real story are oversimplified. It is not a good source of historical information.

Algren, a disenfranchised army captain (once under the command of George Custer), travels to Japan to help the new Meiji government in training its first Western-style army. He leads the army into battle against Katsumoto's men, is routed and captured, and is imprisoned in Katsumoto's isolated village. While there, Algren begins to learn of the code of bushido and through this, he has an epiphany and becomes a samurai. The movie's climax occurs as a rebel cavalry charge is stopped by Gatling guns.



.........Yeah...... Last Samurai is a remake of Shogun.

reply

Definately, The Last Samurai was basically Shogun in drag, but it goes nowhere near to doing the Shogun tale any justice.

If it bleeds, we can kill it.

reply

[deleted]

Hmm... remake... well, casting it would be a bitch. Who'd play Rodruigez, finding someone to do it better than John Rhys-Davis is hard. Not to mention the Japanese characters (Mariko, who? Shimada was great as her. Maybe Nakama Yukie or Matsu Takako, big maybe though.)

Guy Pearce, I duno, Ewan MacGregor would be better I'd say.

They shouldn't remake everything. I hope that IF it would be done, it'd be an English/Japanese co-production. I just hope they wouldn't let Hollywood butcher around with it. Clavell might rotate in his grave in that case.

Though I've been missing 3 things in the series. 1) Blackthorne actually cooking, I would love to see Mariko's and Fujiko's face when they try his food (though, the look on their faces when he told them about how pheasants were handled in Europe was already priceless). 2) Mariko's fight in Osaka. I always thought it shows that she's not just useless eyecandy. After all it leads to her seppuku threat. 3) Toranaga in the end, when his whole plot is revealed. I've been missing some interesting and (IMO) important parts of this revelation in the series.

But that'd be all.

reply

The 12 hour Shogun is one of if not THE only book to films wherein the film mirrors the book. It wasnt adapted (screenplay) the book is the script it seems.
Whats interesting is the book is 1200pages film-12hrs.
Prehaps some dialogue is left out but its litle if any.

Remake? Mini-series is really a poor name for Shougun. Its an Epic.
Filmed on locaation its cast was perfect. It will never be "remade"

Even with such dedication to bring the pages into reality there is much that just cant be translated smoothly into a movie.
Examples: What the various factions really think of each other and the treachery or plan they have.
(Toranaga gives Yabu his sword in Anjiro as a distraction so he could leave before Yabu realized he could take his head)

Clavells Shogun is a ficional account of another book: The Diary of Will Adams

reply

[deleted]

Blackthorn = William Adams
Mariko = Hosokawa Gracia
Toranaga = Tokugawa Ieyasu
Ishido = Ishida Mitsunari
Goroda = Oda Nobunaga
Yaemon = Toyotomi Hideyori
Nakamura = Toyotomi Hideyoshi
Goroda = Oda Nobunaga
etc. etc. etc.
Most of Shogun is fictionalised accounts of real historical figures.
Still a great mini-series though.

reply

Toyotmi Hideyori as Yaemon? Get stuffed! They should use one of the Jonas Brothers in makeup.

reply

There's just no way I could see McGregor playing this role. Blackthorn was a bold, strapping man which does not suit Ewan at all. In an ideal world I'd like to see Russell Crowe play him, but I'm not sure he's ready to bow out of Hollywood to make a TV series (which is the way it should be made).

If it bleeds, we can kill it.

reply

[deleted]

Oh no,please no.
I hope they never remake this movie,ever.
Who would ever replace Toshiro?
Would it be like Last Samurai?
That would be horrible.
Toshiro was the last Samurai of film.
No No No.

I like my marshmallows burned & flaming.

reply

I hear that.

reply

[deleted]

There are a few old classics out there that deserve to be revisited and I'm forever wondering when they shall come. I have only a few on my mind at this moment in time, but I'm sure you'll add your own:

Hard Times (aka Street Fighter) (1975): This in my opinion was Charles Bronson's finest hour. It was raw and again gave us some lovable characters.

I think this one is achievable if there were to follow the direct format i.e. keep it dark and gritty.

Shogun (1980 TV mini series): Now I never saw the TV series, but have read the book several times and it's by far and a way the best book I've ever read. If not a movie then I think this would be PERFECT for a TV series (they got the format right the first time) and could die happy tomorrow if the people that made ROME were to take on this project. Ah yes, ancient Japan, the Samurai and a British sailor caught up in the middle. Yes, The Last Samurai came close, but I was frustrated by Tom Cruise's dominance over the entire movie. Yes he played the part very well, but it was the Japanese characters that stole the show for me.

Godzilla: I know they did this in the 90's, but enough time has now elapsed for them to revisit this much loved franchise and hopefully get it right this time. Perhaps the new version could be focused on the monster and not Brodericks love life? Even better, perhaps we wouldn't have to endure any stupid Jurassic Park sons of Godzilla in the stadium. We can only hope!

The warriors (1979): Now this is kind of a double edged sword as I'd love to see this made in to a modern version, but at the same time I just don't think any remake could live up to the original incarnation. The characters were to die for (I'm to this day a little saddened every time I see Ajax arrested in the park and scream at the screen to just leave her alone!), the dialogue was perfect and the fight scenes were as good as you could hope for that decade.

I'm just not sure if they could make a gang based movie these days without either turning it in to a shoot em up, or making everyone martial arts masters.

Shame and a great waste.

Your thoughts and suggestions are welcomed...


If it bleeds, we can kill it.

reply

There are a few old classics out there that deserve to be revisited and I'm forever wondering when they shall come.


Shogun (1980 TV mini series): Now I never saw the TV series


I would advise you to first watch the original before you start talking about remakes.

If not a movie then I think this would be PERFECT for a TV series

I know, it is perfect for a TV series and you know what, IT IS ALREADY A TV Series.
As a matter of fact your discussing on it's board.

reply

Ah yes, another person who enters a conversation with snide and condescending comments. Bravo, I salute you. Thank you also for pointing out that I am writing on the Shogun board, coincidentally I had lost my ability to read at the time of writing this post.

Well who knows what you do when you’re not writing posts here attempting to seem clever, but when you’re not I invite you in return to go and watch a TV show made in the 70’s that you have never seen before, but that a friend swears blind is unmissable. Perhaps you’ll get lucky, but the likelihood is that it shall have dated terribly and much of the original magic shall be lost on you – “Why all the fuss?” you shall hear yourself exclaim. Thus forgive me if I stick to the book for the time being and continue to hope for a current remake.


If it bleeds, we can kill it.

reply

[deleted]

...and yes, having now watched twenty minutes of this on TV (all I could stand as it was already starting to corrupt my appreciation for the book), it was tired, dated and failed to convey any kind of magic. WHAT A SURPRISE!!! Given that my father - who reads the book on an annual basis and watched the series at the time it was released - thinks it's awful too, then I think it's pretty safe to assume that it's time for a revisit by HBO, or another trusted entity.


If it bleeds, we can kill it.

reply

Shogun is, possibly, my favourite novel and the series a firm favourite of mine, also... I certainly wouldn't be adverse to a remake, however, either for the big, or small, screen, and think the possibilities here are massive i.e. a series could be imagined on either medium, and with the right ingredients, would surely work.

As far as The Last Samurai is concerned, well, I thought it was a wonderful film, brimming with splendid performances (Connery aside), terrific scenery, cinematography and a fine script, based on real events, let down only in the final reel.

NOW TARZAN MAKE WAR!

reply

[deleted]

Yes, and your points too were decisive, descriptive and fully conveyed your point...

If it bleeds, we can kill it.

reply

[deleted]

"Such a completely subjective and abstract response is in no way convincing."

That translates to watch it before judging it? Is English your second language?

If it bleeds, we can kill it.

reply

[deleted]

Okay, well I concede your point there. I’d say there’s a slight break down in the communication of my point. Being that it’s been a long time since I made any posts on Shogun – and that they were spread over a number of posts – I’ve forgotten exactly what has been said (and where). Thus it would appear that you are correct, my comments here are part of a separate argument and as such don’t give any further insight other that to say “I’ve watched a little bit and it was crap.”

Right then, let’s remedy this…

I think we’ve already established that this is my favourite book of all time, hence the reason I would love the opportunity to enjoy this on screen as well – either via the medium of the big screen, or preferably stretched out as part of an extended twelve part HBO (or equivalent), TV series. Actually, the more I think of this the possibilities could be quite something here in that the novel could be dealt with in detail in Season 1 and then allow for an extension of the story in subsequent seasons. Yes, I appreciate that allows for the possibility of disaster, ruining a classic, but hey, as we have nothing at the moment then where is the harm in trying? If you don’t like it then no one is forcing you to watch it.

In terms of the 80’s Shogun TV version, yes, I watched a little and as I had expected all along, it felt instantly tired and dated – voice over narratives, shoddy visuals, etc. Of course you can argue until you are blue in the face that this is a classic, timeless, etc, etc. However, you presumably have grown up with this version and have a love for it as a result. I can certainly empathize with this as I feel the same about many of the movies/shows I grew up with…but that doesn’t mean that they do stand the test of time.

Consider yourself in this example and occasions where you have tried to watch ‘the classics’ but just haven’t been able to get on board as it’s not what you have grown up with – given that our tastes evolve over the years largely based on that which CAME BEFORE. That’s never happened?

I’ve witnessed this first hand. I’ve sat down with my father (on more nights than I care to remember), to watch his favourite movies from when he was a younger man. Let us remember that these movies were the smash hits of the day, but with the exception of a few that have a never ending charm, were in general just painful for me to endure. I’ve since experienced that same happen to me given that my wife is a decade my junior and we have run through ‘classic movie night’ situations. Whilst we both enjoy the same kind of movies/TV series now, she just isn’t able to enjoy those that I grew up with in the 80’s as they are simply not of her era. You can surely understand this?...

I’m not suggesting that there aren’t classics out there that shall forever stand the test of time (ones that you can still watch today even if you missed them during their era), but these examples are rare and the simple fact is, you ask a teenager today to sit down and watch thirty year old movies, or ‘the classics’ and they’ll be nodding off on the sofa before you know it. I personally adore period piece shows that are available now (Rome, The Tudors, etc), and have fond memories of other such greats in the past (that I again grew up with), but ask me to watch similar material from the early 70’s or before and that I missed the first time and it won’t be long before I’ll lose the will to live. Again, are you saying that this is not true for you? I’ve no idea how old you are, but apply the same to movies/shows that were twenty years plus before your time and then ask how you feel about it.

So given this understanding I would ask you to for a moment remove yourself from your personal fond memories of Shogun and accept that it might be time for a revamp for those of us who weren’t able to enjoy it the first time. The majority of the younger population will have never even heard of Shogun (I don’t even think it’s in print anymore), let alone have seen the TV version. In the event they did stumble across it then the chances of it being watched in its entirety are VERY slim and would be done so by less than 1% of the population – I love the book and even I won’t watch it! So far the closest I’ve come to having something to watch was of course The Last Samurai. I found this very enjoyable, but the story was nothing by comparison to that of Shogun…even if most of the same elements were present.

There are oh so many people in here who campaign against remakes, but I believe they’re very much needed. Naturally so many of remakes succeed in falling flat, but then look at how many other original movies/TV programs today do exactly the same – how many times do you watch trailers today for brand new offerings and think ‘Well that looks like a load of *beep* I know I do it a lot! Let us not forget those that are triumphs. The prime example I like to draw upon is always King Kong. Three versions, each better than the last…or do you think the 1930’s version is still the best?...

We’ve discussed the premise of missing originals first time around – ergo having no knowledge of their existence - and the subsequent inability to enjoy later – remembering the style of film making moves very quickly, which is ever so present in the 80’s version of Shogun – but there are two other key factors that are pro remakes. I would say the arguments for are:

1. The visually dated – Shogun may look old, but it’s more the direction approach that is the issue. As the first example that springs to mind, I’m actually looking forward to the release of Clash of the Titans. This was just about my favourite movie as a boy – the one I’m make my mother rent every single time we went to the local video store – and I own it now. Despite it sitting proudly in my collection, it’s only for nostalgia and comes out at best, once a decade when I am ironing and need some background noise. The story is still wonderful, but it looks ridiculous. Fair? I can’t imagine my son wanting to sit down and watch this one with me when he’s old enough! Therefore, an injection of new blood will be great.

2. The tired – Another remake I’m really quite excited about (along with many others), is Highlander. Now then, like you with your love for Shogun, I grew up with this, think it’s perfect just as it is (ignoring any and all sequels) and honestly don’t think they can improve on it. HOWEVER! Given that I have watched it just about ten thousand times over the space of roughly twenty five years, I’m tired of it. As with Clash of the Titans, it really only comes out to play once in a blue moon and even then I would have to be really in the mood to be able to enjoy it properly – without being distracted by something else. So bring on the remake I say. It may not be as good as the first, it may even be better. The point is who knows, but at least I can watch something new in one of my favourite stories.

So, hopefully this shall satisfy your complaints as to why I feel a remake for Shogun is urgently needed. If this doesn’t do it then nothing will!


If it bleeds, we can kill it.

reply

[deleted]

Well I am very pleased that we are able to move forward in this discussion and I particularly enjoyed your rant on descriptions of sea worthiness.

Once again I must concede to your logic that I can't very well judge the screen version of Shogun until I have watched it. In reality, and despite my personally viewed legitimate arguments, I am sure that it would be quite watchable - labeling it as crap is probably unfair. However, and again on the premise of my previous statements, I doubt I could ever love it. In all honesty, my primary concern when I stumbled across Shogun rwas how it would effect my interpretation of the book. As you would expect I have a very clear image in my mind of what the characters look like and sadly the images of those on the screen didn't match my own. So, when I read it next time will I now only see the actors faces? For a classic I am 'likely' to only enjoy at best, I don't feel it's worth corrupting a book I love. For a revamped version? Well then I think I could live with said risk.

Well, not much more to say other than I hope your affiliation with this work endures the years.

...and as a parting gift to another Rome fan...the big screen version is expected next year! I believe it's set to pick up the story in Germany four years later from the end of Season 2.


If it bleeds, we can kill it.

reply

I'm just about done the book myself, and I got the miniseries on Netflix. Looking forward to watching it and coming to my own opinion.

reply

I just finished reading the book a few minutes ago. At the same time as I read the book I've been taking Japanese art history classes and learning about the very same people fictionalized in the book.

I almost felt stupid wondering why I could not recall learning any of the names in the book while seeing the major events as being very familiar. I didn't want to do historical research and ruin the book's plot as I was unsure for most of the book about who each character represented.

I would like to see the series now and see how it holds up to my mind. I always prefer to read the book first. Occasionally, like with Lord of the Rings, the movie's characters work rather well for reading the books again, as I had only read the series once before seeing the first film.

In further anticipation for upcoming movies I've read Watchmen for the first time and I've now started on The Yiddish Policemen's Union after learning of the Coen Brothers' movie.

reply

I general, ideas of remakes of most of all movies is not a great idea at all. With a tiny exception remakes becomes better than the originals. It is worth only if the whole idea of the book is spoiled by the movie. So it should not be called remake but resurrection.
In this particular case, the remake can not be better than the original movie, which is an event in itself.
And for instance, a remake of a painting is always just a copy of the original, BTW.

reply

War of the Worlds and The Day the Earth Stood Still, are two of many examples on why this classic should not be remade.

reply

[deleted]