HUGE logical problem in the movie
At least in my opinion, this movie suffers from a huge logical failing: the whole point or pivotal point of what is happening is that life is soon going to end. At least that's how everybody except maybe Essex, see it. But the questions is why?
Food shortage? This is the kicker: noone is seen eating, but noone is starving, either. Everybody looks well-fed, and some look even fat. What from? What is everyone eating? Some people are old - they grew to be old, so they had a continuous supply of something nutritious. What is it? Inquisitive minds would like to know! Don't tell me that it's tangential to the movie, because a movie about extinction and the availability of food are strongly connected.
For example: there are no seals. As those animals survive in cold temperatures, one can easily imagine that they are one of the last staples for survival. If not even seals exist, it's reasonable to assume that not much else, in terms of food, is there. So what the heck are people eating?
In any case, it is apparent that there's a steady and abundant supply of food, so that's not the issue. There's plenty of electrical energy, so that's not a problem either. What the people in the movie have not, apparently, mastered, is sealing of their homes. The yhave windows and doors (and massive ones, at that), and they could keep warm if they only sealed these rooms, but for whatever reason they choose to live in ice-cold compartments. I have a hard time in believing in such collective idiocy.
You know, there are communities that live in cold climates. They are not particularly worried about death, nor do they play "quintet". Just what was the reasoning of the authors of this script? Suspend disbelief to the max?