i think it was boring



some people like it, some don't. i managed only the first 30 mins of the film. cant stand seeing more.


I kept kissing frogs looking for a prince.

reply

What kind of film were you expecting to see? This is serious drama and as such requires a commitment from the viewer to get involved. There was no fluff in this film.

reply

I agree, the movie is just outstanding! Period.

reply

I've just watched this film and thought it was incredible. One of those films that will stay with me for a very long time.

Why anyone bothers to comment on here that they thought a film was boring astounds me really. Why bother?!

reply

[deleted]

OP - your opinion is both boring and objectively wrong

reply

How exactly can someone´s opinion regarding a film´s entertainment value be "objectively wrong"?



"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

How exactly can someone´s opinion regarding a film´s entertainment value be "objectively wrong"?
It can't. Only Cassavetes fanboys say sh!t like that.

That being said, I thought it was dull, too.

reply

If you only watched 30 minutes, how can you say its boring?

reply

Chrissy 13 , you should view the film again when you are Chrissy 30 !
You might then begin to appreciate what a brilliant film this is !

reply

you're right! it was boring...

reply

Like all John Cassavettes films, boring and pretentious, not to mention overly long. ZZZZZZ

reply

i watched all of it and can tell you didn't miss anything, it is very un-engaging

i don't see how you can get into it unless you feel a connection with the main actress

5/10

i have to say that Gena Rowlands doesn't do it for me, neither in this nor in "A Woman Under The Influence", she's not a subtle actress, it doesn't feel like it's coming natural to her, you always feel like she's acting





so many movies, so little time

reply