Raped?


Does anyone else think Katerina was raped? It seemed like she was more drunk than he was and when he put her on a bed, turning the light off, she was saying no don't.

reply

No, I did not think that she was raped. I haven't watched the movie in a while, but I don't recall the "No, don't" making her sound frightened or like she actually did not want to do anything with him. Maybe her emotions were manipulated by the charismatic sleazy man, but I don't think it was rape.

reply

I definitely think she was raped. She had been drinking, and she said no, the "no" makes it pretty simple. She could have been more forceful, yes, but it doesn't matter. She said "no" several times and repeatedly turned the lights back on, but he refused to listen. I think this is the kind of situation that wouldn't have been defined as rape back in the 1950s, but today definitely is. Watching it actually made me angry, especially because people will claim that that isn't rape, but she was taken advantage of and then thrown away. He took advantage of her tipsiness and quiet demeanor.

reply

nobody force her to had sex, it was a mutual desire.

reply

[deleted]

Every girl says this. Especially when it's her first sex.

reply

This is an ignorant assumption. I don't think this was her first sex. She was a factory worker and a university student, age 20.

Rape is
1) A lack of consent from both people. She kept saying no when he put himself on top of her and turned off the light. She could not have left the situation when there was a much heavier man lying on top of her when she was drunk.
2) If the woman is intoxicated and the man is not.

Many rape victims
1) Don't realize they've been raped at first
2) Feel shame or guilt after they realize it
3) Deny that the consent was not mutual
4) Feel angry with the perpetrator

The character experienced 1, 2, 3 and 4. Maybe she wasn't raped in the way most movies portray rape (as violent) but she still had sex forced on her.

reply

Too many people are obviously too young here, and don't understand that the world is changing rapidly. Also, they seem not to understand the differences between distant cultures. USSR in 1950's wasn't USA or UK or Netherlands in 2010's.

Russians were and still are among the most religious nations in the world. Even decades of communist atheist propaganda couldn't really change it. Also, we must remember that Katya (as the most of other movie characters as well) wasn't born in Moscow, she comes from county where this conservatism is even more emphasized. So, in the years when men had all the real power in country and have been both officially and traditionally considered more worth then women, and in culture where (in those years) innocence has been normal and expected, females have not been supposed to engage in sexual activities, at least not voluntarily and with enthusiasm (even enjoying it was a reason for suspicion...). She had to show resistance to prove that she was well behaved, she had good manners and morality. On the other hand, Rudolf was a resident of Moscow where this traditional roles started to change, but as a TV star he surely had enough experience both with local girls and those that were coming from distance, so he recognized the role she had to play.

But these roles in traditional Russia had other obligations as well, and she expected Rudolf to play by the rules - he was supposed to marry her. As he refused to do it and left her to handle pregnancy and motherhood on her own, she was disappointed and angry - however not because she was raped but because she was abandoned. And what he did was by far morally wrong than raping her, even if the rape happened. Surely, modern feminists won't agree with this, but modern feminists didn't live in Russia sixty years ago.

reply

Uh. Been in a few situation where I was told "no", even with long term girlfriends and it was taken as a "no".

I know that men can be hard to stop in these situations, but "no" means "no" and, technically, it was a rape.

It does not have to involve violence or drug to make it a rape.

reply

I don't think it's clear one way or the other.

reply

No.

reply

It was without question rape. I saw this film when it was new (I was a college student at the time), and I was horrified by the scene even then. I can't believe, after all these years, that there are still people who can watch a scene like that, where there was no consent from the woman and the man was clearly forcing himself on her, and consider it consensual sex. This is why rape and violence against women are still so prevalent in our society. Educate yourselves, people. Jeez.

reply

I agree, it was a rape.
I saw this when I was about 15 y old, and already wandered.
But that is what is interesting about this movie for me. Through 80's this scene would not have even been considered rape, this question didn't even come up in former soviet countries. This is from the male perspective but considering the cultural context I think women didn't think this was rape back then either.

Now we watch this with a different background and considering today's rules this should be considered a rape.
Although things have been changing in the east Europe, I think most people in Russia would be surprised and angered by the notion that what happened is not normal and could be considered rape.

reply

[deleted]

No, of course not. She wasn't physically forced to the point of being unable to resist. The fact is, many women say 'no' in order to salve their consciences before they do it. Saying no doesn't mean they don't want to do it. If the guy then said 'okay, forget it', believe me, the woman is more likely to be offended than relieved. She basically wants to be coerced in the right way. The guy here was doing it wrong, that's all. She could have pushed him off and walked to the door or simply used some sterner words. She let it happen here, despite that she wasn't sure about it, and that's often the way stuff happens in life. Human witlessness, no doubt, but not crime.
Those who are screaming rape here are dangerously naive and a menace to society.

reply

There's no way to know - we weren't shown how they ended up having sex.

reply

I just watched the movie. They start to kiss and she's also active in it and the guy shuts the lights. Then she says no, hits the lights back on, sits up on the sofa and starts to fix her dress. After a brief pause the guy grabs and kisses her and shuts the lights again. Then it cuts away.

It's unclear if she changes her mind in the heat of passion, but at one point she clearly says no. I think the filmmakers were intentionally vague about whether or not there was consent.

reply