MovieChat Forums > A Little Romance (1979) Discussion > Daniel Was a Little Creepy

Daniel Was a Little Creepy


Taking poor Lauren to a porn flick, getting her drunk and for being jealous of a 70 year old man because he wasn't the center of attention for 2 minutes. By the way did he even go to school? All he did was hang out in revival movie theaters. There was just something a little off with this film. Sometimes it just ventured a little too close into sitcom material for me (esp. with the school friend, who had to be one of the worst child actresses and also Daniel's too well dresssed friend).

Become who you are. Pindar

reply

I don't know if I agree. He admitted later on that he had never actually seen a porno movie. He thought it might be sort of romantic to take her but it just ended up being really vulgar.

Yeah, I hadn't thought about how he never seemed to be in school, but then again we did see him on the field trip (the day he met Lauren) and we never saw her in school either (except for her field trip to the Louvre).

I can see where you are coming from in reference to the girl that played Lauren's best friend, Natalie. But I disagree. I found her portrayal of the character to be hilarious. I couldn't tell if it was the character being an awkward, overly-dramatic 13 year old girl or just really bad acting. Either way, she had me laughing in every scene she was in.

reply

[deleted]

Daniel had the makings of a little stalker. He was just trying to outreach his grasp by finding himself a rich American. Lauren was too good for him. I was glad when she left him.

Become who you are. Pindar

reply

[deleted]

Absolutely...Hoffman is creepy in real life, too!

reply

I kind of found daniel a little bit of a loser, after he insulted the old man (julius) I was like "you just lost your charm" at times I wanted to punch him in the face or tell him to shut up.

reply

Yeah, I relate to the anti-Deniel sentiment. I didn't hate him, but he was a pouty boorish boy (cared more about his horse-wager system than anything or anyone) who had as many negative traits as positive. Still, good enough of a character to make this movie work. The real winner was Diane Lane, she was a revelation in this picture.

reply

Of course he was creepy... most genius IQ people are! I didn't care for much of his behavior, but the movie was so good I overlooked his "boorishness". I still liked him very much and always wondered why we never saw anything more of him... but like most good "child" actors, they don't make good adult actors. Besides, his accent was too thick and I heard his English wasn't so good and that he just learned his lines. I'm not sure if that's true, but you'd think he'd at least make a somewhat decent French actor.

reply

Did you and I see the same movie? How did you draw the conclusion that Daniel was out to snag a "rich American?" If it had been Lauren's choice, she would have gladly stayed in Paris, but it wasn't; her stepfather chose to return to the States.

Did you think that Lauren was stalking Daniel when she joined his field trip?

Lighten up.


Some movies are released; others sneak out.

reply

Creepy? CREEPY?!? What finishing school did you attend? When I was 15 years old and passionately in love, in my heroic and earnest attempts at chivalry I did my knight-in-shining-armor best in ways that of course I look back on as silly, risky, twee and self-centered. Today I am suave, polished, deferential and I look back at my teen chuckleheadedness with, um...longing.

reply

Today I am suave, polished, deferential





~
All of us get lost in the darkness
Dreamers learn to steer by the stars

reply

He was NOT little creepy. He was FULL ON CREEPY. I bet today is an ugly, depressed, mean Frenchman with bad body odor, no hair, and on his third 'wife'.

reply

He reminded me a bit of Truffaut's Antoine Doinel. In fact, I thought there was a deliberate echo.

reply

The complaints about Daniel in these and other posts on this board are comparable to issues raised about Romeo and Juliet--that Romeo was shallow and silly compared to the intelligent and thoughtful Juliet, who would have outgrown him in about five years! Their breakup may have driven the families further apart whereas their deaths brought them together. I found Daniel, as portrayed by Theolonius Bernard, a perfect example of an extremely bright, well-meaning boy attracted to a charming girl and his behavior perfectly suited to his age and intelligence level. He did silly juvenile things such as shoplifting it is hoped a more mature person would not stoop to, but his heart was in the right place. I found him exceptionally cute and both characters charming and equally appealing--a much better balance than in Titanic in which Leonardo DiCaprio is several times more charming than Kate Winslet.

It's also important to remember how Daniel defended Lauren's honor by punching George when George asked, "Did you score, kid?" A really creepy boy would have said, "What do you think?" rather than demanding George apologize to Lauren.

reply

It's also important to remember how Daniel defended Lauren's honor by punching George when George asked, "Did you score, kid?" A really creepy boy would have said, "What do you think?" rather than demanding George apologize to Lauren.

Great point! A lot of young boys are actually portrayed this way in the movies and TV shows. I like that the movie showed how sophisticated and mature Daniel by his irritation with the much older, boorish George. It stayed consistent with Daniel's character.

reply