MovieChat Forums > Kramer vs. Kramer (1979) Discussion > I'm only 40 minutes into this movie but ...

I'm only 40 minutes into this movie but ????


Why doesn't he hire a good nanny??? There are a lot of people who relate to kids really well, and many good agencies in New York City where he could search for one. Just wondering????

reply

He read the script. No nanny

reply

Remember, he lost his job, then took one for less salary.

reply

If he had hired a nanny, what would the story be? The movie is about the relationship built between father and son.

It's a movie!

reply

Why didn't Joanna insist on hiring a nanny for Billy so that she too could pursue her passions rather than abandoning her whole fcking family??

reply

I have to agree. He was making enough money to hire help. And later, she got a good job too. They could have definitely afforded it.

reply

And he hired a nanny in the book. Maybe wouldn't have lost his job if he had a nanny. But guess it would have watered down the story of doing it all on his own.

reply

Yes, in real life he would have hired a nanny.

In real life, Joanna would have found herself and come back in a friendly way and been much happier because her husband had evolved considerably as well.

reply

How incompetent were men back then? This guy cannot even make coffee? The french toast thing was ridiculous. What’s wrong with cereal on a busy morning? Besides, his kid is in 1st grade, not a toddler. He just needs a babysitter to watch him after school a few hours, maybe a few nights. And the boss frowning upon every mention of the guy’s son or prioritizing his son’s safety over some paper streamer office boozefest. I see no difference between this office environment and the one depicted in Mad Men.

reply

Hiring a nanny back then was something only "rich people" did, or parents who couldn't hack it as parents. It might've been seen as either an extravagance or a mark of shame, just going by how things "felt" to me as a middle class American back then.

And the boss frowning upon every mention of the guy’s son or prioritizing his son’s safety over some paper streamer office boozefest. I see no difference between this office environment and the one depicted in Mad Men.


It wasn't that different; this film was closer to the "Mad Men" era than our own. And it was DEFINITELY frowned upon for a white-collar father to prioritize his family over his career. That's what wives were for.

Times have changed

reply