MovieChat Forums > Being There (1980) Discussion > My thoughts on the end scene--spoilers

My thoughts on the end scene--spoilers


I have read many, many interpretations of the ending scene. I have my own thoughts on it, just how it struck me, both at the time of seeing it and pondering it after.

Some have said that it likens him to a Jesus figure. I don't agree. There is nothing in the movie that gives indication that he is Jesus, Jesus-like, or anything else in a spiritual sense.

Others have commented that because he is so lucky, he just happens to wander into a shallow area by chance, (like his name, ha ha!), and the proof point is his checking the water...e.g. he would not have to check the water if he was truly walking on it.

I don't buy that either. There is no point for the setup of all that for such a bland explanation, especially for the end of the film. He is checking the water to show us, the audience, that the water is deep--a plot device if you will. If it was shallow there, it would still be shallow a little ways over!

My feeling is he is of course walking on water. How he can do that, or who he really is, is not the point. The point is, that we the viewer, are put into the same predicament that the very characters in the movie find themselves.

During the entire movie, people take just what they see, and make it into what they want it to be. His philosophy for simple gardening as a metaphor for the economy. His basic communication abilities for someone with depth and thoughtfulness of answer. His demeanor mistaken for someone who might be hiding something. His pleasantness for love. His innocence for directness. We laugh along with the situations because we KNOW what the deal is.

At the end, we find that we DON'T know what the deal really is. We made assumptions about Chance right along with everyone else. And we do that in life when we judge others, all day long, every day, without really knowing them or what they are about. We do business with people we don't know, we have friends that if we really knew them, we might not be their friends, we have sex with people we think love us, and we may not really even know them.

So the ending makes us look at us. It is just as plain as that, and I thoroughly enjoyed that curveball!

reply

This is a great analysis. Nice work.

reply

Thank you. I hope you enjoyed the movie as much as I did.

reply

I dont really understand your explination, i love the thought that went in to it, but i cant see how that explains the ending. Personally the second one makes more sense in context of the movie

reply

Others have commented that because he is so lucky, he just happens to wander into a shallow area by chance, (like his name, ha ha!), and the proof point is his checking the water...e.g. he would not have to check the water if he was truly walking on it.


There is no point for the setup of all that for such a bland explanation, especially for the end of the film. He is checking the water to show us, the audience, that the water is deep--a plot device if you will. If it was shallow there, it would still be shallow a little ways over!


There is no point for the setup leading to his lucky walk out into the shallow water? The entire movie is filled with episodes of Chance being very lucky- hence his name. In addition, it doesn't make any sense to conclude that we don't know Chance and can't interpret his actions - it is established early in the movie that he is a simpleton who knows nothing outside of his employer's home and television.

The end of the movie clearly shows Chance testing the depth of the water all around him, with his cane. He isn't showing the water's depth to us - we don't exist in the world depicted in the movie. He is unsure of the water's depth himself - that's why he is testing it.

My real name is Jeff

reply

That's a brilliant summation and in fact, I think it makes the most sense. The ending doesn't answer any questions categorically or provide a perfectly neat explanation, just like the characters and their thoughts on Chance.

reply

I've always believed he doesn't sink because he doesn't know what he can't do.

reply

Exactly; it's symbolic.

It's likely he's never seen a pond before, so he just walks on the water because he thinks he can (or, maybe more appropriately, he doesn't know he can't walk on water), and like everything we've seen before, he comes out smelling like roses.

The last line of the movie only reinforces this idea.


Poetry don't work on whores.

reply

Well thought out!

reply