MovieChat Forums > La montagna del dio cannibale (1979) Discussion > Worth waiting for Ursula Andress' explic...

Worth waiting for Ursula Andress' explicit scene

posted 15 years ago by jeffyoung1
6 replies | jump to latest

Okay, so this flick was total gruesome, unexcusable exploitation. But it's worth the guilty pleasure scene of Ursula Andress' character, Susan Stevenson being stripped naked and body-waxed with some kind of varnish liquid. For a gal in her early forties she could still catch a guy's attention.
I don't know if anyone ever told her that she had a high forehead that gave a 'balding' look. Andress should have adopted a hair style that draped hair over her bare forehead.

[–] rockmail 15 years ago

I think the word you're looking for is "graphic" rather than "explicit".

Explicit usually defines a specific "action", usually sexuality or violence in a movie, and neither happens in this scene.

It is "graphic", in that for at least brief moments, there is full frontal (from a side angle) nudity, and bits and pieces of other nudity as the camera tilts up and intersperses cuts.

She does get a poster paint rubdown from a couple of a lucky actresses. Scan up to about 1:19:00 to get to the point.

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] deathwax 13 years ago

she looked alright... I thought that one chick who was the native dude's wife was a little hotter, actually. but yeah, they looked okay for a chick in her 40s. :)

http://myspace.com/adipocere

[–] jammerjax 12 years ago

The side bush scence was great and this was on YOUTBE a year ago on the movie part of YOUTUBE this was not not that bad.And i never seen her in anythis but JAMES BOND;Dr.No back in 1962.

[–] bryguy615 9 years ago

yeah, explicit would more describe that so-called beastiality scene, that I never seen

[–] legnadibrom (5697) 5 years ago

a high forehead that gave her a "balding" look?
you're out of your gourd broseph