MovieChat Forums > The Medusa Touch (1978) Discussion > Why does Morlar choose evil over good?

Why does Morlar choose evil over good?


Here's a man who can cause disease (his nanny and the judge) so, he could just as easily cure disease. He writes books and rails on about the evil institutions causing suffering and injustice around the world yet, he wills a 747 full of innocent people to crash in the center of London. I get that it is a horror movie so evil must prevail because it is more entertaining but, it just doesn't make sense that he has the power of god to do good in the world and yet, he succumbs to evil... oh, commee onn. The guy is clever enough to figure out biblical evil is as much a construct as the bible itself so, why choose to be a dick? His shrink totally missed the big signals here. She should have jammed the needle into his sorry arse and sedated him like they do any schizo off medication and she would have saved thousands of lives..

reply

He does not know any better, and his doctor did not help him at all to understand himself. Instead she corrupted him with her stubbornness. His disease and harm causing was at first fueled by his hate (later on to make the doctor believe him), so presumably his love could correspondingly cure and help people (along with some Jedi style training). However noone helped him understand make that simple connection in his entire life. The doctor was his last resort and instead of helping him she drove him insane. She even tried to kill him and then took her own life instead of helping him and trying to understand him, which was all that he asked.

In a sense the doctor chose the destructive way as well, perhaps because if she accepted that he had powers and tried to help him she would have to reconsider her entire viewpoint of the world and much of her medical training. This is made quite evident in the film. Doing bad, stupid things is always much easier than doing something good and creative. This requires real work. If the film has any message this is it. If a Kwisatz Haderach (look it up) like Morlar is ever born he will be morally pure, aka neither good nor evil. If he asks the help of someone like Zonfeld he might destroy the world. But if he is helped by a mentor who will try to understand him, train him, teach him self-discipline, love him and cultivate his powers, then a new golden age for mankind will commence, because "The sleeper will awaken" (yet another Dune reference)

Fanboy : a person who does not think while watching.

reply

Of course he knows better, he writes books about injustice and suffering yet fails to use his omnipotence to right those wrongs. He loves humanity and wants people to love him but we are to believe he can't figure out how or why he should actually effect the solutions he writes about in his books (I assume he talks about solutions and doesn't just point out the obvious evil in the world). Like all good gods, he probably wants people to worship him... no, I think the writer was stoned when he put this one together..

reply

Fiction is distinct from reality. In his books he appears to understand these things, but in the real word he required an authority figure to guide him morally regarding the application of his powers (because he lacked the authority and understanding to guide himself). He may distinguish right from wrong but he specifically does not understand why he has these powers. That is the key question.

If God made him that way why did he do it, to create or destroy? To help others or punish them? He is one of a kind so he has no other like him to compare to. So he relies on an authority figure who represents science, since religion has already failed to provide him with answers. And his doctor fails him as well. By "morally pure" above I meant in relation to his powers, not in general. Generally he might have been moral, but he cannot apply that morality to his powers because he does not understand why he has them and noone in his entire life helped him to do so. Thus, he concludes that he is the angel of death incarnate, sent by God to punish the sinners. His doctor and her hate, fear and extreme stubborness, is what corrupted him.

Fanboy : a person who does not think while watching.

reply

What nonsense. Morlar was an atheist, he as much said so yet he appeared to be possessed.. end of story. He could have just as easily convinced her of his powers by making her strip her clothes off and perform a lap dance, but instead he downs a jumbo in central London... good choice, good grief.

reply

I think I would have liked your version of this movie better. Too bad you weren't the screenwriter.

reply

The whole point of the story is that Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."

Simple as that


๎‡Atheism is a religion in the same way that celibacy is a sexual position๎†

reply

I'm pretty sure in the film he states that he can only cause death and destruction, and asks why that is.

Nowhere is there evidence of him being to perform benevolent miracles e.g. Curing disease.

reply

@Alaninho - When did he say that? You best quote him cause I didn't pick it up and I replayed several times just to get my context accurate. He just doesn't understand why he is an arsehat, not why his only party trick is mayhem rather then benevolence.

reply

No, don't agree with that @Munstrum. There are many powerful and benevolent people in the world, we just never hear about there charity.

reply

Because once you assume a god complex, but fixate on the bad stuff that your omnipotence could prevent but effectively are caused, or allowed to happen, by your non-intervention, then you are likely to conclude that "god" is inherently evil. The alternative for Morlar is to accept that he is impotent. That he is neither the cause of or prevention to disaster.

reply

His 'power' only goes into operation when something royally ticks him off and incurs his 'deathlook.' It's similar to the way Bruce Banner only turns into the Hulk when he gets angry.

In other words, because anger provokes his 'gift' it naturally manifests in destruction.

Even in the case of bringing down the airplane, he was irked that his therapist didn't believe him. Thus he angrily says to himself, "I'll show her."

But that leaves us with the question of why he doesn't at least try to learn how to tap into this power for benevolent purposes at some point in the story? As someone else pointed out, the obvious theme is power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, which was effectively illustrated in the original Star Trek pilot โ€œWhere No Man Has Gone Before," not to mention "Carrie."

reply

Mmh... Who decides what is "benevolent"? And please don't say the majority because the majority is known for more stupid than wise decisions....

reply

I'm speaking in terms of obvious benevolence or mayhem. Other flicks of this sort illustrate using mind power for benevolence, e.g. healing, such as "Resurrection" (1980), "Powder" (1995), "Phenomenon" (1996) and "Youth Without Youth" (2007). Causing a plane to crash in central London, killing hundreds of innocent people, is obviously not benevolent.

reply

From your list I only know "Phenomenon" which I like, although it is a little naive. Have to check "Powder" soon.

reply

"Powder" is the best of 'em IMHO; it reaches for greatness and gets a finger in. I thought "Phenomenon" copped out at the end. If the protagonist possessed the genius and power to do all that he does in the film, why couldn't he use those powers to deal with a certain situation at the end? To me, the writers & filmmakers played it safe by giving us a "realistic" ending.

Coppola's "Youth Without Youth" contains a contrived story, but features Tim Roth and a lot of depth. If you're in the mood for conventional cinematic entertainment it won't fill the bill even though there are several entertaining elements (the cinematography, music, women and locations); yet if you're looking for cinematic art and weighty mind food, check it out.

"Resurrection" focuses on a woman being a healing vessel in the Midwest, similar to Pentecostal ministers at tent revivals but outside the Church and the potential drama/conflict thereof.

I don't know if you've seen "The Mothman Prophecies," but "The Medusa Touch" is sort of a precursor to that flick.

reply

In between I watched Powder as well as Youth without Youth. I liked the latter more. Powder is more like these naive Christian flicks where all live happily ever after. Not my cup of tea.

reply

(SPOILERS for the climax of "Powder" for anyone who hasn't seen it)

Upon hearing the bad news about the farmhouse & his possessions there, the titular protagonist suddenly bolts into a field during an oncoming storm and a lightning bolt strikes him wherein he disappears in a blinding flash of light, leaving those few who tried to understand him bewildered & hollow. That doesn't sound so "happily ever after" to me.

While I suppose it could be interpreted as a spectacular translation to the celestial realm, like Elijah and Enoch in the bible, it's ambiguous and open to interpretation, especially since there's no evidence that it's a Christian flick (of course you merely said it was "like" such a movie). Moreover, the writer/director has described his movies as "atmospheric and macabre, with no happy endings."

I'm not saying the film doesn't have flaws or eye-rolling moments -- it does -- but I was able to overlook them in view of the big picture and the film's successes.

reply

Yes, it might be the number of eye-rolling moments ๐Ÿ˜ Powder had many of them, meanwhile I don't remember a single one in Phenomenon ๐Ÿค”
But thanks for your point of view.

reply

Thanks. I liked Phenomenon; the final act just left me with a bad taste.

reply

***SPOILER***
The fact that Morlar (albeit semi-conscious) lay in a hospital bed in a semi coma (administered by his own publicist) *might* just have added to his (almost full-blown) disdain of humankind (or at very least, proven his rationale?)

Yes, his cynicism was already there, but perhaps his predicament confirmed/added to such?

reply