MovieChat Forums > Martin Discussion > hmm..so ..was he?

hmm..so ..was he?



was he really a vampire? cause ive seen this 2x i think and it was about 4-5 years ago. i dont remember...or i was trying to force myself that he was but im not sure.




reply

I think it was left open to interpretation. I didn't think he was a vampire, just a psychotic person from a superstitious family but you can think what you want. I like movies with ambiguous endings because they give the viewer just as important of a role in the film as the characters. You have to fill in the blanks with your own imagination.

I've been waiting for you, Ben.

reply

Romero executed it in such a way that it could go either way, depending on what the audience decided. However, in my opinion, it works better thematically if Martin is not a real vampire, but rather a seriously disturbed person. After all, if Martin is really an incurable monster, Cuda was right in the end. Given how critical the film was of mysticism, it seems more fitting if Martin was psychologically troubled, more in need of therapy than ritual. However, it's ultimately up to the viewer.



They're advancing the wrong way! Retreat Backwards!

reply

In the short documentary on the DVD, George Romero says he thinks Martin is a nutcase, not a real vampire.

reply

I think its pretty obvious that he wasn't a vampire I definitely believe he was just a messed up kid.

reply