MovieChat Forums > Halloween (1978) Discussion > What if Dr. Loomis knew about Laurie bei...

What if Dr. Loomis knew about Laurie being Michael Myers sister before?


Remember in Halloween 2 Nurse Chambers gives Loomis the information about Laurie Strode being Michael Myers sister, because it was sealed years before and the judge opened it.

How would the film have played out if Dr. Loomis had been access to this information years before and knew that Michael had another sister besides Judith? Then he warns Laurie and her parents about Michael and his relation to Laurie, when Michael escaped it would take a simple phone call to warn the parents and Laurie that he had escaped and might be coming after her.

Laurie would just go into hiding before Michael ever arrived in town, the police would know his motives and take Loomis more seriously, i never understood after watching Halloween 2 why the information was kept a secret from Loomis, if Loomis knew about his secret he could have easily ruined his return home.

reply

i never understood after watching Halloween 2 why the information was kept a secret from Loomis, if Loomis knew about his secret he could have easily ruined his return home.





And then we would have no movie.


HALLOWEEN II scraped the bottom of the barrel as it was to come up with anything it could offer as story.

The secret file revelation was pure desperation to inject something of interest into what otherwise would have been nothing but an outright pursuit.

Making Loomis aware of the sister file would have made it easier to protect Laurie and thwart Michael's plans to the point that it would work against the premise.

Keeping him unaware the way it stands, for me defied logic and the sister reveal itself undermined the original concept, made the scenario far less frightening but enabled the film to at least stake a feeble claim to have added some story.

For me it also gave us a markedly inferior film to its predecessor.







And Darkness and Decay and the Red Death held illimitable dominion over all.

reply

Didn't wanna bring Laurie down. Would you like to know you have a homicidal maniac for a brother?

RIP Gene Wilder. One of the funniest people of all time. RIP Robert Vaughn

reply

They kept it from Loomis because they didn't want to bring Laurie down? Rubbish.

The poster above you has the right idea. It was a convoluted plot device that was poorly thought out. Why would they keep this information from Myers' doctor?

reply

Hey, Leo, the sky is blue, right?

RIP Gene Wilder. One of the funniest people of all time. RIP Robert Vaughn

reply

Some of these goofs will disagree with everything under the sun

reply

You can count Leo among those goofs.

RIP Gene Wilder. One of the funniest people of all time. RIP Robert Vaughn

reply

Sorry if this rains on your parade, but the fact that Loomis didn't know that Myers and Laurie were siblings is complete garbage. The whole thing reeks of stupidity. Why would they keep this information from him? Wouldn't this information be of some use in case he happened to escape? Why would they keep it under wraps and then have Laurie visit him at Smith's Grove anyways? Wouldn't Loomis and Laurie cross paths? The whole thing is one big mess. Good thing none of this has anything to do with the original and everything to do with the complete mess that is Halloween II.

The fact that you think any of this is plausible makes you the goof.

reply

Usually agree with you, but you have to understand. A lot of unseen factors here. No one lived in the Myers house since the murder, which means the parents moved. We never even hear Loomis talk about the parents, who died two years after Michael was committed. And honestly, who would bring a 2 year old or a 4 year old to a sanitarium? So what if Loomis never even met the parents and they stayed away or went into hiding for those 2 years between committal and death? How would Loomis know anything?

He spent 6 months with that boy. Not once did he say he ever consulted or visited the parents. He was obsessed with Michael. Michael alone. After the parents died records were sealed. Even *if* Loomis knew Michael had another sibling, how would he know it was Laurie? IRL people get adopted all the time and never know their birth parents, let alone some doctor. Some don't even know they're adopted at all. They are never told.

Laurie spent 13 of those 15 years with the Strodes. Even in the remake Brackett was the only one who seemed to know that the Strodes adopted Laurie. Entire town, including Laurie herself, clueless. And they lived in the same town.

People's looks can change from 2-4 to 17. So how would Loomis know what she looked like if he ever met her? And Loomis wasn't there 24/7, so Laurie in her flashback could've conceivably seen Michael when Loomis was away. Not once do we know when the visit was, if Loomis had a family, nothing. No backstory. On purpose. Variables can't fill up holes.

Granted it was a way to get around it all, making her family, but it's not completely out of the realm of possibility. Besides, it's a horror movie and not meant to shoehorn into reality or sense. So suspension of disbelief and all that. In any event, my reasoning is good enough for me and that's all that counts to me. So it doesn't bother me or ruin the movie.

Excess cast, 2 directors, needless body count gore, little suspense and all the things the original was not, bother me. But not Loomis' ignorance.


"He came home." - Dr. Sam Loomis from the original HalloweeN

reply

I can see your points, but I just can't seem to get past the fact that the reason given for the records to be sealed was to protect the family, which I'm guessing is the Strodes, why in the world would they proceed to take her to visit him?

I realize that Loomis probably wouldn't have known who Laurie was if he had seen her, but having the information that Myers had a sister living in Haddonfield along with a name would have went a long way in helping his case when trying to explain what was going on with Brackett.

I could understand keeping it confidencial from the public, but I think its crazy for Loomis and the powers at be from Smith's Grove not to know it.

reply

Dave gets it, finally. Except the cast and Gore stuff. You needed a hospital staff, hence the bigger cast, and it's still not as gory as a Friday movie. Get past it, Leo.

RIP Gene Wilder. One of the funniest people of all time. RIP Robert Vaughn

reply

I'm past it. I just think it makes no sense.

reply

Even though David just gave plausible explanations?

RIP Gene Wilder. One of the funniest people of all time. RIP Robert Vaughn

reply

Yes. I don't think there's any way that Loomis isn't made aware of Laurie's existence. If Myers' parents were killed two years after he went to Smith's Grove are we not to expect that they may have went to visit him? He was their son after all. I doubt they just cut all ties with him. How do we know Loomis didn't have sit downs with them like what was done in the remake with Myers' mother? Is it out of the realm of common sense to think that maybe Laurie could have been with them on one of those sit downs?

Like I and many others have said. The sibling angle was put into the story to provide some meat to it because as Carpenter said, "there was no more story to tell." In order to do that they had to come up with some sort of reason for Loomis not to know so they conceived this "the file was sealed to protect the family" stuff even though Laurie continued to visit him with her new family. Sorry, but it makes no sense. We're just going to have to agree to disagree.

reply

Fair enough. Wouldn't be the first time, right?

RIP Gene Wilder. One of the funniest people of all time. RIP Robert Vaughn

reply

Doubt it. They don't know Loomis and wouldn't have taken him seriously like it is shown in the movies after the second one. Loomis always tried to convince the cops any recent killings were Michael related. Why would Laurie believe a complete stranger telling her she has a killer brother coming after her.

It's not like Loomis knew of Michael's full intentions to kill his entire family anyway.

Little Mikey Myers that lived across the street.

reply

Which wasn't a thing until 4 or 5.

RIP Gene Wilder. One of the funniest people of all time. RIP Robert Vaughn

reply