MovieChat Forums > Death on the Nile (1978) Discussion > Why Was Linnet Such A B----???

Why Was Linnet Such A B----???


It seems her favourite amusement was to antagonise everybody, small and big alike.

God is subtle, but He is not malicious. (Albert Einstein)

reply

Agatha Christie had a penchant for writing non-multidimensional character — to put it mildly. Linnet is a socialite who never had to work and always got what she wanted…including Simon Doyle. I wonder if she would have managed to steal him from Jackie if…well, Jackie and Simon had never worked out a plan like this, if Jackie really just wanted her friend to give her poor fiance a job, and nothing else.

reply

[deleted]

It's certainly true that Lynette was a spoiled socialite with a history of getting her own way in every regard. She also, in the book, had a certain moral sense and desire to do the right thing, but is cautioned by a friend that she is just as likely to antagonize people with her efforts--as witness the conversation with Louise about not chasing a man who's already married.

reply

She didn't "steal" Simon from Jackie. There's no such thing as "stealing" someone's man, or woman because people aren't property,
If person A is in an accountable relationship with person B and B leaves A for C, it's because B doesn't love A enough to stay faithful. I think A ought to thank C for making that clear before it was too late,

reply

Well, there's a lot more to it than that. Thank C? Forget it. B and C deserve each other, but A shouldn't thank C for making off with her bf. Friends don't do that to friends. No way to justify it, rationalize it, or make it respectable; it's trashy behavior, 100%,

reply

Because if everyone liked her then there would be no plot.

She was somewhat gentler in the book though.

reply

Agree with that

reply

This was probably the intention of the author Agatha Christie, because with such an disagreeable character, so many people would have a motive to kill her; therefore the plot would thicken.

Hitchcock often employed the same tactic: the murder victim in Strangers On A Train is a thoroughly nasty b$%#h who will not give the hero a divorce, even though she is pregnant with another man's baby. The villain in that movie then kills the hero's wife and then tries to blackmail the hero into murdering the villain's wealthy father in return. SOAT is a great Hitchcock classic and one of the greatest films of all time, one of the reasons being that the audience has more sympathy for the murderer than the victim. It's kind of the same case with Death On The Nile.

reply

As already mentioned here, she was much nicer in the book than she was in the movie. She wasn't a saint by any means, but not a complete cow either and you could feel sorry for her, when she was killed (at least I did).

reply

[deleted]

She was drawn that way.

reply