MovieChat Forums > Days of Heaven (1978) Discussion > Didn't get the movie on first viewing, b...

Didn't get the movie on first viewing, but...


It touched something deep within my soul. It gave birth to a sense of wonder and awe about this world, made me feel that there is so much life amongst us yet unlived and so much to yearn for. I don't know whether it was the hauntingly beautiful background score or the stunning visuals that the filmmakers conferred to us, but when it ended it was already one of my favorite movies which I could watch over and over and never get enough of. I didn't care for plot or characterization much as the experience was too much to take and understood at one go. I believe this is the case with all masterpieces; you may not comprehend what is being said at first, but the impact lingers on and compels you to go back to them again and again with intentions to grasp whatever little we can to make the experience worthwhile.

reply

I woke up in the night thinking of this film and how it ends. Haven't seen it in years but watch every time I find it on cable. I love your remarks about it, Reachtitan. There's something so beautiful and moving about the film. In many ways it shouldn't "work" (and thus many don't seem to enjoy it) and yet it does work for a great number of people who fall under its spell. Linda Manz's narration, her tone of voice, make it seem like a fractured memory recalled many years later. Her character was a young girl who saw all these events unfold but didn't fully understand the emotions and motivations of the people she observed.

reply

Yes, and that's precisely why the movie develops into a detached kaleidoscope and seemingly abhors to explain what exactly is going on as a little girl is supposed to have only a meagre understanding of the ways of this world, how adult people think and act, etc. Thank you juliaz3, for liking my views and also for sharing an adoration for the movie. You are right, this isn't for everyone but for those who are patient and ready to lend their attention to a different kind of storytelling which unravels the incidents mostly through images and sounds. For me, this is a work of a true auteur.

reply

It was very moving and haunting. It reminds me a bit of the movie "This Property is Condemned" with Natalie Wood. Wood plays a beautiful girl maybe 20 years old or so. She has a young sister who reminds me a little of Linda. I don't remember, but I think the younger sister may narrate the film and she also ends up at the end walking down railroad tracks with a friend. The ending has the same feeling. I'll never forget that ending.

reply

It was also stark and cynical, in a way, painting a mosaic of characters and feeling that never felt completely whole when juxtaposed against the vast expanse of sky and ground, fire and wheat, hate and love that enveloped it all beyond any one person's own strength of will to drive and prevent. It's an edifying kind of starkness, though, I guess, because what it doesn't do is hold bias towards either Man or Nature, or will or fate or whatever. With (and I think the voiceover by Linda has much [if not everything] to do with it) placidity, it assumes the part of a sort of disembodied, haunting memory, as rife with beautiful images as it was with cold and remorseless reality.

But in spite of what can be said about the plot (which isn't that much, lol), it's the central theme I think that hammers home the most grounded, most direct implication of human facticity; something universal and once experienced by all before; something I realized that the movie might just have been principally (if not all) about. After Linda walks away with one of her good friends from which she originally met at the farm, stepping along the tracks of the empty railroad, her voice emerges again over the scene, and she is again talking to us in -ed's and was's. She refers to the girl as lost and sort of wandering, not much sure where she was heading, and then recounts their friendship as one distant and long ago, as if now (or at least, at the time of her speaking), she was gone. Estranged. Maybe even dead. Who knows?

And then that's when I recalled a previous line, also from Manz's fudgin' sublime voiceover, lol, about the farmer and being lonely.

And then I thought, oh. Maybe that's what it was about. Maybe, in some way, it was about loneliness; about the emotional isolation that came not from sky or ground, fire or wheat, or even hate and love, but from just being a child in a world reigned by men much older, women matured -- adults who, apparently, didn't seem to know where their destiny lay just as much as Linda could have measured the worth of a man by his affinity for collecting flowers.

Maybe, in the context of the world, and of time and of nature, of will and chance, of the unfathomable macrocosm of time and of space, alone is all we humans can yearn to be; everything else -- well -- is not up to you.

reply

Great post, krelsman12!

I watched the movie again soon after and it struck me as a haunting elegy, indeed as you said, to loneliness. Three lonely souls adrift in a world even more lonesome and harsh and indifferent; they meet a fourth and their fates get intertwined amidst a vast expanse of land as unpromising as their destinies and while they live, love and breathe playfully among themselves, stay nonetheless unwitting to the fateful denouement of their unfulfilled lives. Indeed, it is as much a chronicle about loneliness as it is about predestination. Words are seldom spoken yet the images and sounds stay with us and make us wonder about the two women that got away.

You mention a lot of things which are yet to be comprehended by me but repeated viewings might lend some understanding, maybe. But as I said in one of my earlier posts, the movie has an aura of wonder, a sense of an awe, so despite the tragic and uncertain end, we are left with a gleam of hope, which might be yet another aspect the movie evinces, a hope that Linda might see a better tomorrow and so might her friend and Abby. I may not gain the complete import of what has been said, but I take with me the wonder, awe and hope which all of us as well as these characters long for, who are individuals at fault and yet are universal as the elements.

reply

Maybe, in the context of the world, and of time and of nature, of will and chance, of the unfathomable macrocosm of time and of space, alone is all we humans can yearn to be; everything else -- well -- is not up to you.


That is so profound! Your insight was wonderful! This movie takes awhile to really grab you, as it haunts you months after viewing it...What a work of art!

reply

"Didn't get the movie on first viewing, but... It touched something deep within my soul. It gave birth to a sense of wonder and awe about this world".

But the above proves you DID "get it"...



"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

Well, I am not sure if that was the movie all about. It might be open to several other interpretations. I just stated the 'above' as my, for the lack of a better word, understanding of the film.

reply