MovieChat Forums > Coma (1978) Discussion > Should this be remade?

Should this be remade?


Mabey.
JIMMY RULES!
I'm JIMMY!

reply

Ahhh.. all that remake mumbo jumbo... Why can't it be left as it is? An excellent movie. There's no reason to remake anything. Being INSPIRED by something is another story, but this remake *beep* gets on my nerves. Why can't something NEW be created instead? How could this classic have been made if everybody involved in this had been thinking of remaking something from the 50s instead of doing this movie???


EDIT: By some strange coincidence, just after my initial angry response here, I saw Extreme Measures from 1996, which is based on the same novel... Not a patch on Coma, but still good. So it's not a remake per se... And so my initial ravings here are still maybe just as valid? Hehe...

reply

I really enjoyed coma, it was a very well done film, and very underated. But they would have to have younger actors playing the parts. Can you imagine michael douglas playing the part now?, or richard widmark who is 90 staring in it.
Andrew Lishak Stoke Newington London

reply

Michael Douglas was terrific, Richard Widmark was great, and Genevieve Bujold has been magnificent in anything she's ever done. All of them deserved Oscar nominations and did not get them. THEY SHOULD NOT REMAKE THIS MOVIE. If they do, it will bomb big time. There aren't any actors in their thirties (or sixties) with the talent and range that these three had back then for this type of drama. But I'll bet that Michael Douglas would be fine for the part of "Dr. George" that Richard Widmark played in the original. Douglas is now in his mid-sixties which Widmark, (who's just passed away at age 93) was at the time. In fact, I think Douglas is now about the same exact age. Widmark was about sixty-four when this thing came out in 1978.

Yet, if you cast actors who are the same age now as the original three were then, the two leads would seem much younger than Douglas and Bujold were then, so I would not recommend a remake on that score alone. People in their late twenties and early thirties were much more mature on every level than young people of the same age are today. And people who are now in their sixties (particularly celebrities who can afford to look younger as they get older) look like people used to look in their early thirties. So maybe Michael Douglas is still too young to play Dr. George as Widmark played him.

Still, I can't help wondering what a remake would be like if say the splendid Keira Knightley played Dr. Wheeler, Patrick Dempsey played Dr. Mark Bellows, and Douglas played Dr. George. I don't know who could be cast in the part that Rip Torn (who was so great playing villains) played in Coma, but no one could top Elizabeth Ashley in the role that was apparently a cross between Nurse Ratched and a Stepford spouse. Just a pipe dream.

reply

I despise the crop of cheap remakes these days. However, Coma one of the few stories that I could see benefitting from a quality update. Michael Douglas could play Dr. George.

reply

[deleted]

It's extremely risky doing a remake. The majority of remakes turn out far worse than the originals. ("Day of the Jackal"/"The Jackal", "Ladykillers"/"Ladykillers", "Rear Window"/"Disturbia" etc...)

reply

If they did do it they need to stay with the book:

1. The Heroine was no a physician, but a Medical Student.

2. Her hero was a physician overseeing her group's time

3. They were NOT in a relationship

4. Lastly, and most importantly, we never knew if she came to or not in the book.

reply

I read the book and I recall that Susan Wheeler did spend the night with Dr. Bellows on the same day that they met. By the way, Michael Crichton (who wrote this screenplay) is a great writer and must be thrilled that the Jurassic Park movies (directed, Thank God, by the terrific Spielberg) did his own novels justice. Perhaps if a remake was done of COMA Spielberg could direct it. It might not be a bomb under those circumstances. Spielberg was the one who put "ER" on NBC as a series, and this was the brainchild of Crichton's from way back when, even before COMA was made into a movie. But I think the author Robin Cook is satisfied with the 1978 film because it needs no improvement.

reply

It <i>could</i> be remade. But it would be ruined.

reply

See "Donor" with Melissa Gilbert.

reply

yeah, this is one that I would really like to see remade. unfortunately we have movies like the island which are basically covering the same topic and I don't think today's theatre-goers would have the patience to sit still for this, besides if they did remake it you know it'd have to be redone to blockbuster effects. Too bad.

Head Bitch in Charge
xoxoxo
I LOVE NEW YORK!!!

reply

No Way!!! We have enough of remakes the world don't need, as THE OMEN 666 (killied all mystics & magic of the original from 1976). PSYCHO (by Gus Van Saint, no comment!), JACKAL (Gere & Willis' flop of their career) , GET-AWAY (w/Kim Basinger) etc. The list is endless! COMA is a classic & can't get done any better!!!

Pat (Switzerland)

reply

No. Nothing that worked fine the first time around needs to be remade. If people are too stupid to go back and watch the originals they deserve to miss out on them.

reply

No, remakes turn into re-imaginations and re-interpretations with newer tech, worse screenwriting and usually leave us going back to the oldies. If you want proof just waste 4 hours on A&E's remake of The Andromeda Strain...

reply

Absolutely not. This is a classic.

reply

I don't see why they shouldn't remake it. Yes, this version is a classic and I love it, but 30 years later and with the right actors and writers it can be done.

I'd like to see the characters stick closer to the book and perhaps the action. This movie version includes key scenes but I'll never forget being a 16 year-old young woman and reading this book and being completely enthralled by the strong and intelligent person Susan Wheeler was and she was only a few years older than me. Reading the action sequences was far more heart-pounding than the seeing them acted out in the movie for me too.

I think done right, this movie can renew the interest and Cook's original intent of the book to draw attention to the plight of organ donations and medical ethics. There are tons of people out there who need their interest in the book piqued again and many younger people who need to read it for the first time.

With Cook's book being written with more of a feminist approach about women in medicine and it having come true in the last decade, I would love to update the theme to incite more of modern role model theme. I believe that many young women today would gain a lot from a movie in which the lead character is intelligent, beautiful, strong and a heroine without being an under-dressed prostitute who uses her looks to win the day.

reply

1996's Extreme Measures (with Hugh Grant and Gene Hackman) pretty much *was* a remake of Coma.

reply

Right, so there is no need for remake. Besides, Coma was on a pedistal all it's own. It had dramatic symbolism of feminism and just was a completely different movie. They could NEVER remake it a get it right this time around...not that I think anyone would want to.

Enough talk of remakes. I can't believe remakes have come this far.


Young man is angry! Girl is afraid! He wants to get high, she wants to get paid! City's Burning!

reply

Okay I said no but I've thought about it, this beautiful classic will always be here to watch so a remake is okay because as bad as it would pale to comparison to this classic, it's a totally separate film and does not affect this movie at all.

reply