Yes, I don't believe humans ever visited the moon. BUT: I am the first to admit they did if shown undisputable proof, which so far I haven't.
Make up your own mind.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.html
Let me guess. These are fake, too.
I am talking about HUMANS visiting the moon, NOT getting equipment there.
shareThat was clever, but you're still delusional.
shareNo. I'm a scientist. I hope did did go to the moon, I just haven't seen the proof of it yet. Am I delusional for only believing things of which I have actually seen proof? Or should I just take anybody's word for it if they state something?
shareIf you're a scientist, then why did you fall for these claims in Sibrel's video?
They (USSR) had logged 500% more hours in space than the USA; only true until 1965.
Had the unmanned Soviet lander not crashed it would have brought back the first moon rock.
Press coverage of NASA activities is entirely government controlled.
The Van Allen Radiation Belts extend from 1000 to 25000 miles above the Earth surface.
Every space mission with humans on board except for Apollo remained below the VAB.
Solid lead shielding is required to travel through the VAB.
The Saturn V rocket can't lift off with lead shielding installed.
The Apollo spacecrafts shielding was less than 1/8 inch of aluminum.
JFK set the IRREVOCABLE goal of landing a man on the moon by the end of the 1960's after the first American astronaut spent 5 minutes in space.
The technology required to launch the Saturn V rocket and an ICBM is 95% similar.
The Soviets put the first animal in space.
The sole goal of Apollo was to be the first to plant a flag on the moon.
Building the first atomic bomb did not involved secrets getting out.
NASA launched the TETR satellite to simulate flight data coming from the moon.
"No. I'm a scientist."
Hey, so am I by coincidence. Physics with a post-grad in engineering.
What is your degree?
No. I'm a scientist. I hope did did go to the moon, I just haven't seen the proof of it yet.
How can you possibly be a scientist when you cant work out for yourself that the moon landing was real without seeing whatever it is that counts as proof for you.
Rubbish. The cold war was at it's height. The Russians were monitoring.
You think they would have made claims had it been false.
Conspiracy theorists are a waste of time.
Proof? Armstrong and Aldrin placed mirrors on the surface to reflect back to earth to see exactly how far the moon is from the Earth and those mirrors are still operational. So explain how a robotic lander would place several mirrors in exactly the correct position with 1960's technology?
Don't confuse the OP/self-appointed "scientist" with facts.
sharelol
shareI like Joe Rogan's videos on the subject. Even though he claims to be no longer a denier, much of what he says suggests that he should still deny the official story.
shareThis is dumb. I clicked on random location in the movie and they were showing shadows that were not parallel, suggesting that a second light source was used.
1. If that is so, why there are no two shadows?
2. If large area light source was used, then why the shadows are hard edged?
3. Do we know the geometry of the terrain upon which the shadows were cast?
4. Do we know if the object casting the long thin shadow is perfectly vertical?
5. Do we know the parameters of the camera and its tendency to distort perespective?
I wonder, what is your science, Mr. Scientist?
You're delusional with a 50/50 chance of being a troll. The Russians for sure would've disproved our claims if they had not been true. And you think they faked Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17? Once would've been enough if we wanted to pull of a ruse like that. What's the point of continuing to fake Moon landings again and again and again?
Each one involves hundreds more people with access to intelligence and data, that have to be "in on" the conspiracy. You think after all these years, one of those many 100's of people would've come forward with definitive proof they were faked?
Surely the point here is for the OP to provide proof that the landings were fake, not the other way round?
But it seems all they have are youtube videos. Yep...the home of all the nutters and conspiracy theorists.
Could be a money-grabbing attempt to draw people to their YouTube channel.
There are some interesting, but flawed, Moon Landing conspiracy theories. Every big story always has a conspiracy now. I'm offended though, by the 9/11 conspiracy theorists (US inside job to favor the war machine). And don't even get me started on Flat Earthers. That one makes no sense.
Yeah...the truth is on YouTube...
I love the ones that try and use that tag line 'the footage/documentary they don't want you to see'/tried to ban'. Etc.
So...why is it available to view on YouTube freely where almost every single person on the planet can see it?
If ever anything appeared on YouTube that was 'banned' or whatever, it would be pulled down so fast hardly anyone would be aware of its existence.
That video is dirt. Anyone who presents this is evidence of a hoax really needs to re-examine their reasoning skills. Sibrel must think that the people viewing this video are complete morons if they are expected to believe the crap he is shoveling.
Here is my response to Sibrel's garbage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxpweYalUd4&t=12s
Anyone who believes this "hoax" crap is a complete moron.
share