I think there is some kind of assumption that George Lucas owes the fans something.
Lucas owes it to himself and to Sebastian Shaw, Jason Wingreen and whoever else's work that he ruined from the originals.
The fans don't give a $hit about what Lucas does to his own movies. He can place Jar Jar into every scene in the OT for all we care. The fans just ask for what any sane film maker does when they alter their work - make all incarnations of it available.
Besides, who creates something to make others happy? As an artist you create based on your vision and what you want to make.
Every artist strives to share their creation with their audience. Many of them will tell you that once something they've made is out there, it's no longer solely their own, but rather everybody's, otherwise you'd only make stuff for your own enjoyment.
This idea of entirely removing something that was a part of people's lives and pop culture from the 70s until the 90s is ridiculous. Like what Spielberg said about why he regretted his ET special edition: "I realized what I had done was I had robbed people who loved E.T. of their memories of E.T." << that's an artist who respects what films mean to their audience, and who wants to make them happy.
So earlier comments about Mr L changing post 80's.....Did he really? Or is it more likely that by 91/92 CGI had reached a point that he could create the vision he always had, and unfortunately, that vision was never what you loved about Star Wars?
George Lucas never had a "vision" he always wanted for star wars. If that was the case, why did he make further gratuitous changes to it in 2004 and 2011? So he has a new "vision" of star wars every 7 years?
His "vision" for putting CGI into the OT was so it could match up better with the 90% CGI prequels.
reply
share