MovieChat Forums > Sorcerer (1977) Discussion > Gunshots and (Un)Answered Questions: Fri...

Gunshots and (Un)Answered Questions: Friedkin, Blu-ray and Endings


SPOILERS for Sorcerer, The French Connection


Little things mean a lot.

On Tuesday, a pair of highly anticipated blu-ray releases hit the streets: Sorcerer and Get Carter – two of the most grittily entertaining thrillers of the 1970s.

While each sported a marked upgrade in picture quality from their respective DVDs – particularly Sorcerer, which has long been an object lesson in how home video releases should not be handled – each also seemed to (at least for this viewer) create new problems.


Carter Takes a D(r)ubbing

Get Carter, for whatever reason, includes an infamously poor dubbing job in one of its scenes, despite having been released in Mike Hodges’ preferred original version for North American DVD about ten years ago. Although the affected screen time only amounts to a minute or so, it’s an important minute; Michael Caine, in one of the toughest and best performances of his lengthy career, is being gently scolded about his plans to go up north and investigate the death of his brother. His bosses remind him that he has no special allowances to stir up trouble among criminals with whom their group is allied.

Anyway, instead of sounding like grizzly British gangsters, they sound like goofy caricatures, transforming the scene into something resembling parody. It’s simply not believable that Caine’s ruthless Carter takes orders from these goofs. It hurts the film, particularly if you’re only familiar with the original U.K. language track.

Now, time will tell, but I’m hopeful that next month’s U.K. release will set things right. (I’ll gladly pay another tenner to have this scene restored. Maybe I can get five for the other copy at a used merchant.)


Less and More

No such luck for Sorcerer, which has been changed in a way that’s even less tangible, and even more profound.

The film originally ended with bone-tired Roy Scheider, having successfully delivered the nitro, being paid off in the cantina. He pauses, in a reflective mood, and takes a moment to dance with a local crone. Charlie Parker (with strings) plays “I’ll Remember April” as the camera pulls back, into the street, settling on an arriving taxi. Two men from New Jersey get out. Tangerine Dream’s crushing score slams home and the titles roll.

You can see it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1k4YROuh2g

This is what might be termed an “unambiguous ambiguous ending”; while it’s true that we don’t know for certain what’s happened to Scheider, viewers who’ve been paying even a modicum of attention will recognize the two men who get out of the taxi from earlier in the film – one, a gangster’s muscle; the other, Scheider’s “friend”, the one who arranged for his escape to the jungle in the first place.

In short, he’s a dead man, and his travails on the mountain road, on the bridge, eking out an existence in the horrid town – all for naught. Moreover, the man who fingers Scheider is really the only ally he has left in the world.

The ending’s arguably even more grim when you consider the possibility that the oil company had a hand in the character’s death. Note that the oil man insists on paying by cheque, telling Scheider the company’s fixed it so that he can cash it at a local bank, despite having no valid identification. Perhaps he doesn’t want to hand him $40,000 in cash for his own protection – they don’t have a combative or less-than-civil relationship in prior scenes – but it’s alternatively plausible that he knows what’s in store for Scheider and sees it as an expedient way to save the company some money. And how else would the two goons have known where he’d be at that exact moment?

It’s a haunting ending, made all the more so by Friedkin’s typically uncompromising decision to leave Scheider’s death off screen. But it’d probably be a mistake to call it “ambiguous”. In any case, the ending still has power and finality, largely thanks to the evocative menace of Tangerine Dream’s score. Then the title, Sorcerer, appears on the screen – still no less mystifying as a title, it should be said – putting a nice piece of punctuation on the end of this baffling and powerful film.

In any case, for whatever reason, Friedkin has decided to neuter this ending for its blu-ray release. (Perhaps “neuter” is too strong, but my blood’s still up since watching it last night.)

Now, once the two goons enter the cantina, beneath Tangerine Dream’s score, we hear a gunshot.

Yes, a gunshot. One straight out of a twenty-first century sound effects database. (These gunshots, like the ones used in the new audio mix for the Terminator, or the 1996 5.1 mix for Vertigo, will always sound utterly phony to my ears. Sadly, they are used throughout Sorcerer.)


So What

If you’ve made it this far, you may be asking yourself, “Does this qualitatively change the ending?”

Fair enough. For a few minutes after I’d turned off the blu-ray, that was essentially my reaction. But it put me in mind of something.


Parallels

If you’ve seen The French Connection, there’s a good chance you’ve got an opinion about that film’s final, pre-credits gunshot.

You’ll remember that Popeye Doyle has just gunned down a douchebag fed, by accident, though apparently without any subsequent remorse. Cloudy (Scheider again), Doyle’s partner, incredulously repeats, “You shot Mulderig.”

Doyle, barely breaking stride, not acknowledging the body at their feet, tells Cloudy that Frog 1 is “here” and that he’ll find him. Then he exits the frame around a corner and we hear the deafening final shot. No explanation is provided, but we learn through on-screen text over still frames that the two cops were reassigned and Charnier got away, so we can assume that Doyle fires that last shot or (at the very least) is not the victim of the shot, but nor is Frog 1.

One can only imagine the piss and vinegar running through Friedkin when he decided to include that inexplicable shot as punctuation to his first masterpiece. It gives the film, one that’s already bursting with documentarian-style detail, a feeling that its world is “lived in” – that it will continue to exist beyond the scope of the narrative. Popeye will continue to be a “great detective but a lousy cop” (to quote another notable crime film). But it also shows just how unglued Popeye has become. While viewers might have countenanced his behaviour rousting junkies earlier in the film, or even shooting the assassin in the back, we can’t follow him any further into the abyss.

(One wonders how the final shot would be interpreted if the film had dispensed with the explanatory text that follows. Maybe Doyle shot himself? Maybe he got the Frog?)

In any case, I love the ending of The French Connection – and the ending is that gunshot. It’s a bracing, powerful moment when realization hits home. Friedkin uses Ellis’ atonal score brilliantly here too, with waves of unearthly, hallucinatory sound.

Sorcerer doesn’t need such a moment. Rather, it has such a moment, but that moment is more powerful without such punctuation. The music does the work.

Now, if he’d opted to remove the score over that last shot, and include the sound of the gun going off, it might not feel quite so ham-fisted. But then we’d lose that awesome piece of music.


Bigger Issues?

I suppose one could take this opportunity to talk about the death of ambiguity in contemporary cinema, how this change embodies that, etc., but I don’t think that’s the problem; as I say, the ending wasn’t particularly ambiguous originally.

But unlike the one in The French Connection, this gunshot adds nothing. It feels like the director was worried about distracted or less observant viewers not understanding the ending. In short, it feels like an insult to the viewer’s intelligence. My son, who’s not yet twelve, reacted instantly to the familiar faces of the guys from New Jersey. He got it. He understood the implications immediately, and even if he hadn’t, the music communicates quite clearly that “this is not a happy ending”.

reply

I saw Sorcerer once a long time ago, and last night watched it again with my significant other (who had not seen it before). I heard the sound, but didn't interpret it as a gunshot at first...Maybe it was because I'd seen the movie before and didn't remember there being a gunshot there, maybe it was mixed too low (or the sound on my TV was too low) to have had enough of an impact, but I heard it as an indistinct ambient sound, and unconsciously dismissed it. At least until my S.O. asked me, "Was that a gunshot?" I answered, "Was it? Maybe...?"

It seems like if we could hear the gunshot we would have heard other commotion afterward, like the woman that Scheider was dancing with (or really anyone else in the bar) having some kind of audible reaction to a murder happening right in front of them. In any case, the sound was unnecessary to underline the meaning of the ending.

http://joshacid37.dvdaf.com/

reply

Regardless of whether there was a gunshot, it's pretty clear that Jackie Scanlon's visitors intended to kill him. I never paid much mind to the possibility of a gunshot sound since Friedkin's intentions with the ending seemed so obvious.

reply

So this gunshot was added and can only be heard on the Blu-ray release??

------

Wait a minute... who am I here?

reply

Yepper.

reply

Aw, man! They should get rid of that! I mean why change, really? If it wasn't in the original release, why add it after, changing the movie!? ??? (George Lucas, I'm looking at you!)

reply

I'm with JoshAcid. I don't think it's definitively a gunshot. It's very low in the mix, sounds almost like an axe striking wood. Certainly not your traditional sounding movie gunshot. I didn't even notice it the first time watching the blu ray. I went back and played the last scene a couple of times after reading this thread.
Seems odd that there would only be one shot, too - wouldn't he be shot several times? One seems too clean, too implausible, certainly for this movie, where the deaths are extremely messy.
Obviously the original poster is saying we're dealing with foolish revisionism on Friedkin's part, so in that event my last point doesn't stand, but still.

reply

I don't like revisions! Especially the foolish ones (which is the bulk of all of them out there in numerous films by now)!

reply

Thank you for posting this. I agree with you that Friedkin goofed by adding the gunshot. It takes away from the piece in a gnawing way. It reminds me of how he goofed with the original blu ray video transfer for THE FRENCH CONNECTION, dialing the color saturation way up without Roizman there to provide some balance. I wonder what his reasoning was and why he hasn't mentioned it at all in any of his press for the re-release and restoration? He is always very candid about everything it seems.

reply

Imagine what George Lucas would've done with the new ending. Would Greedo have been a mob enforcer from New Jersey?

reply

Oh lord, dear god! I almost spit my drink onto my monitor-screen laughing my ass off when I read that, wahahahaha! 

Hmm, what's not funny is making those stupid, unnecessary changes at all in the stock film. If those changes are so great, put 'em into some alternate version, or like some Deleted Scenes-like section of the disc, or whatever, who cares!

The point is stop *beep*ing changing the movies! It's unnecessary, stupid, and makes no sense at all. And I'm beginning to suspect that they're doing it to *beep* with and piss-off customers.

reply

It's a gun shot and it wasn't in the original mix. Still, it doesn't really bother me. Scanlon was going to die at their hands anyway. The movie is still great.

reply

Ugh, watching it again with this little cap gun pop really cheapens the end. Seeing the thugs exit the cab and enter the bar with the score rising in the background was sufficient, dare I say brilliant. Adding a dinky stock gunshot into the mix for "clarity's sake" is so against Friedkin's ethos.

reply

Update, courtesy of The Dissolve:

The Dissolve: How did you conceive the journey of Roy Scheider’s character?

Friedkin: That’s open-ended. The film begins in mystery and ends in mystery. There’s a savage journey in between. I don’t know how Scheider’s character ends up, because I didn’t load the deck. He’s in that bar where he’s a hero to the people in the bar. There are armed men in the bar, there’s a couple of police officers from the town, there’s the guys from the oil company, and there’s everybody else who’s around the bar inside and outside, who might be able to foil the two guys who come after him or not. It’s an ambiguous ending in that sense. [Spoilers ahead.]

The Dissolve: You hear the one shot at the end—

Friedkin: Do you know what that shot is? It’s actually a backfire of a vehicle that goes by. But of course, people think it’s a gunshot.

The Dissolve: It’s awfully muffled; you can’t tell if it’s part of the soundtrack or the score. But it seems to represent that.

Friedkin: There’s the hint of a gunshot. I actually used a backfire of a diesel engine.

The Dissolve: So you leave it up to us.

Friedkin: It is totally up to the audience. I wouldn’t even hazard a guess as to whether he gets out of there. There is a small sense of hope, because he is given the letter to the French guy’s wife by the oil-company executive, and you kind of get the feeling he might go to see her, and she’s a very bright and attractive woman, and who knows! He hears nostalgic music from the jukebox which overtakes him, as music often does, and he’s kind of lulled into what could be a false sense of security. There is some hope offered for the possibility of his meeting Victor’s wife. [End spoilers.]

http://thedissolve.com/features/interview/543-william-friedkin-on-sorc erer-his-career-and-fate/



I think Friedkin's being a bit disingenuous here. If it'd been my interview, I would've pointed out that the sound in question has been added, which isn't incidental.

reply

Yeah, I'd agree with you.

Any chance we're only able to hear this sound now because of the quality of Blu-ray transfer?

I haven't watched my copy yet, so just throwing the question out there.

------

Wait a minute... who am I here?

reply

It doesn't sound like a gunshot to me, but as for it always being there, I really can't say, as the sound on the old DVD was so poor.

Did anyone else notice that they cut the sound altogether for a split second, when the Amidou character fell between the slats on the bridge and into the water? It didn't happen on the DVD, but I thought it was really effective to be honest.

IS THIS SOMETHING YOU CAN SHARE WITH THE REST OF US, AMAZING LARRY?!?!

reply

If a closing scene with a gunshot being heard was filmed, I'm glad that it never made the final cut. Having us speculate about what happened next is more interesting than beating audiences over the head with it.

It's obviously strongly implied that Jackie was a goner, but I still like being left with the possibility that he survives, or at least imagining the scenarios under which he's killed (i.e. assassinated on the spot in the seedy bar vs. quietly being escorted out of it at gunpoint and shot in the jungle).

reply

Hey there. I can finally chime in on this.

Just finished the Blu-ray (better transfer, no doubt - good movie)... THEN watched that end scene again off the DVD version.

Um, whatever that sound was, it's not there on the DVD copy. Not even close.

So... yeah... take that how you will.

------

Wait a minute... who am I here?

reply

[deleted]

I can see how the gunshot cheapens the ending
I'm gonna do a version for myself without the gunshot

reply

It's always been obvious Jackie dies in the end. That's what "Sorcerer" means. The cruel wizard of fate. First he survives the car crash (one out of four) then he survives the nitro mission (again, one out of four) only to get murdered by two goons. Pure irony.

reply

After reading this thread ... Here are my thoughts.

Really ?? The sound is whatever you want it to be ! A cheap gunshot it is definitely not. A truck backfiring perhaps ... Does it signify something special ? Does it actually change the way you feel at the end of the film ? Please people ...
The film is incredible !! And if anything the remastered version is more incredible !!
Obviously Mr. Friedkin wanted to sprinkle a little something for the audience seconds before we cut to black. That is his way of telling us that we actually will never truly know what happened. And good for him. The film speaks for itself !

Good nite now ...

reply

a DVD of the restored version came out a bit after the BR-at Friedkins insistence and by fans writing WB-i heard a bang on the stunning new widescreen DVD but thought nothing of it

reply


After reading this thread ... Here are my thoughts.

Really ?? The sound is whatever you want it to be ! A cheap gunshot it is definitely not. A truck backfiring perhaps ... Does it signify something special ? Does it actually change the way you feel at the end of the film ? Please people ...
The film is incredible !! And if anything the remastered version is more incredible !!
Obviously Mr. Friedkin wanted to sprinkle a little something for the audience seconds before we cut to black. That is his way of telling us that we actually will never truly know what happened. And good for him. The film speaks for itself !

Good nite now ...

reply

I've only seen the new blu-ray edition (for whatever reason, I never got around to getting hold of the DVD).

Firstly, it is an excellent film. Adding the extra sound effect may not have been the wisest decision if it was indeed not present in he original cut (or the DVD at any rate), but to be honest I barely noticed the sound. Yes, it could have been a gunshot, or a truck backfiring, or anything else you'd like to imagine (yes, I agree with Friedkin's audience statement). Clearly, though, Schneider was a dead man walking and had been for a while. If his dancing with the woman tells us anything, it's that he wanted one last real contact with a woman before his inevitable death (remember back to the billboard of the woman and with coke bottle). though he probably didn't think it would come so son, but then again...

I have no problem with it and I don't think I would have had I seen the film prior to this new version.

What does bother me a little though, is the complete lack of any extras. Even the booklet, while nice, is nothing new, as I have read his book. Maybe they'll be a commentary on the restored DVD when that is released, which would actually be a nice counter to all of the blu-rays out there with better extras than their recent DVDs. Nice pictures, though.

Time to blow

reply

I agree. Who buys a bluray without a commentary track? Even more, who buys a $20 bluray without commentary when you can watch the same film for $3 on Vudu? The director's favorite film but he can't be bothered to comment on it? What a mistake.

reply

Who buys a bluray without a commentary track?
Me. I rarely find myself bothering with commentary tracks these days; some of them are quite good, but many of them are monotonous, glad-handing exercises in stating the obvious (or are just silent much of the time).

In the case of Friedkin, who should have plenty of scalding anecdotes about production, he seems to always descend into narrating what's occurring on screen. He even does this quite a bit in his track for Vertigo, oddly enough.

A Sorcerer commentary of that kind, I can do without.

"Here we have the second truck moving across the unstable bridge. Scanlon is driving while the character of the hit man is guiding him. Note the trees being swept along by the river," etc.

reply

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1k4YROuh2g
Yep, sometimes less is more, even though today's average dickheaded moviegoer may never, ever grasp such a concept.

reply