I read about this a while ago. If I remember correctly, Pacino was such a big star at this point, having just come off the Godfather movies, that he was a front-runner for the role. The problem was that he wanted full control of the production, including his choice of director - Sydney Lumet (Serpico, Dog Day Afternoon), which was a deal-breaker for the studio (not so much Lumet, but Pacino having control of the movie).
Huge blessing and genius move by the studio if that's the case (and boy, you never say that very often). The movie was directed by George Roy Hill, who also directed Newman in 'Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid' and 'The Sting'. George Roy Hill was also from Minnesota and, if I'm not mistaken, coming from Minnesota he was a huge hockey fan and I think that is clearly evident in the film. And of course he already worked with Paul Newman on a couple of all-time classics, so it really was a perfect mixture.
Like it's already been said, Newman could feasibly pass for early/mid 40's in this film since he was in such good shape. Just because the script said mid/late 30's, it doesn't really matter - the point is still the same. It was a role meant for someone in the twilight of his career with zero shot at making it to the pros. Newman was perfect.
reply
share