Ok, but Coppolas is the best Dracula adaptation!
I've seen a few people say that this is the most faithful Dracula adaptation but even though it is more faithful than most other Dracula flicks I think it's watchable but a bit dull and Louis Jordan like in just about every other Dracula flick has the cape and fangs routine [as if they're all copying the now silly looking Lugosi Dracula] which i think looks camp and pantomime like as it's been parodied so many times and it's also nothing like the books description.
In fact I'd argue that Coppolas Dracula is no less faithful to the book than this film, possibly even more so. they both have their pro's and cons when it comes to faithfulness to the book but even though it has its faults [like all the other Dracula films] Coppolas captures the spirit of the book more than any other adaptation and it's also beautifully filmed. People keep pointing out there's more romance in Coppolas flick and maybe that's true but Dracula still goes after the women in just about every film adaptation and they portray him as a sort of tall dark and handsome womaniser [which is hardly anything like the book] including this one.
It's also more realistic and includes the different incarnations such as the aged Dracula, young Dracula which this version and other film versions don't do.
Spielbergs WOTW is an insult to HG Wells and Russell T Davies is the worst ever Dr Who writer!