MovieChat Forums > Audrey Rose (1977) Discussion > Ivy of the novel - why did the author se...

Ivy of the novel - why did the author sexualize her?


Susan Swift doesn't look anything like Ivy of the novel. Susan looked like the girl next door. Is that why they offered her the role?

reply

Yes I suppose. Most 10 year olds are cute, not strikingly beautiful. She also had a sensual mouth in the novel, didn't she? I find that creepy for a child of her age.

reply

[deleted]

So far in the 2 books I read by author Frank DeFelitta, he has a tendency to victimize and sexualize the female protagonists, like in The Entity and Audrey Rose, which in this case the protagonist is a mere child!

reply

I wonder why he wanted to sexualize a ten-year-old. Weird.

reply

I think he kind of sexualized her at the beginning, because he was trying to set it up to make you the reader think that Hoover was going to be a pedophile at first, of course that wasn't the case. You notice that she wasn't sexualized later on in the book, only in the beginning.



You may not like him, Minister, but you can't deny, Dumbledore's got style.

reply

But HalfbloodPrincess, it wouldn't make any difference if Ivy had been described as petite and undeveloped. The reader could still think Hoover was a pedophile. Besides, aren't pedophiles sexually attracted to children? Ivy looked like a fifteen-year-old with huge breasts!

reply

The cover illustration on the novel depicted a girl with no breasts, but with long, golden hair and incredibly long legs. That enough is a pedophile's wet-dream.

reply

[deleted]

Brooke looked exactly like Ivy.
Actually Courtney Barilla & Melissa Sue Anderson looked more like Ivy of the novel, in terms of face features and hair color. Brooke was a brunette at 10 years old and has green eyes (?) while Ivy is described as having long blond hair - pure to the roots -large deep blue eyes and very delicate white skin.

reply

Wow, Brooke does look like the novel cover!

http://www.horrorstew.com/images/AudreyRose29.jpg

Good call.

reply