MovieChat Forums > Silent Movie (1976) Discussion > Unfunniest Movie of ALL TIME

Unfunniest Movie of ALL TIME


I've just watched this film and I can't believe how unfunny it was. I'm a big fan of Mel Brooks' films, especially Blazing Saddles and The Producers so it amazes me that the same man is responsible for this childish, talentless rubbish. I also think Marty Feldman is the most overrated 'comedy' actor ever. He was good in Young Frankenstien......until he opened his gob.


reply

I'd say Feldman's quite underated...as is this movie. Mel Brooks has a lot of "childish" movies in my opinion, like "Blazzing Saddles", all it is is potty humour, there's not much plot, and Gene Wilder all but saves the film. This one I personally feel was a very creative idea, and Brooks, Feldman, and Deluise are hillarious visually. He got the right people, I'd say. But hey, to each their own.

reply

Yes comedy is too subjective to really argue. It's impossible to convince someone that something think is funny is funny to someone else. I happen to think this is a terrific film and Brooks' last great movie.

reply

The satire in Blazing Saddles is brilliant.

reply

I just watched this for the first time in twenty years and it wasn't that good. I got a few chuckles out of it but it's hard to believe this had a major release.

After about fifteen minutes I just hit fast forward scan and watched it in fast motion so I could get through it quickly and since there was no dialogue it worked out fine. It actually helped make it more enjoyable because it gave it that feel of old movies where everything is moving a little faster. Especially the wheelchair race scene and the dancing with Anne Bancroft.

But overall I thought it lacked well, everything...

reply

it IS a good movie, it's a parody of the silent movie's of the 20's
so if you watch those movies of the 20's (like i do), you'll get it.

reply

it IS a good movie, it's a parody of the silent movie's of the 20's
so if you watch those movies of the 20's (like i do), you'll get it.


This may be the most fatuous, condescending comment I've ever read on IMDb, and that's saying something. I love silent movies, I love most of Mel Brooks' oevre, and HATED this movie. Dracula: Dead and Loving It had more chuckles than this POS. I was embarrassed for Newman and Caan. This must have come as a staggering disappointment just two years after the double-punch of Blazing Saddles and Young Frankenstein in '74.

Some people "get it" and some don't.


It's very exhausting being told that I didn't like something because I "don't get it." I got the premise, I got the intent, I got the jokes. NONE of them were particularly funny.

I only wish someone had taken Brooks' idea for this movie and done it instead. There were so many great opportunities in this film that it just hurt to watch.

reply

[deleted]

This may not have been the greatest movie of all time or even Mel Brooks's greatest movie. But it wasn't SUPPOSED to be! It was just supposed to be entertaining and in my opinion, only someone dead between the ears would fail to be entertained by Silent Movie, if only a little bit. Given a few years, this movie could become a cult classic along the lines of Plan 9 from Outer Space and The Rocky Horror Picture Show.

At least you can't complain that you can't hear the dialogue...

Muvphreek, Child of the 50's, the TV Generation

reply

Well as far as understanding the film I did get it, since i am a huge buff on silent movies (Cleopatra, Gentlemen prefer blondes,Londor after midnight, etc) I felt Mel couldve done better, maybe done the movie in black and white?...maybe. I'll give this movie a chance as ive seen the worst film ever made(Frogs), so in conclusion, i felt Mel couldve provided a more serious film, and although he does comedy he shouldve went with the more dramatic plot, ie Phantom of the opera(SM).

reply

RE: kareiyasu

Sorry, but anyone who is a "huge buff on silent movies" would know that Gentlemen Prefer Blondes and London After Midnight are both lost prints that nobody has seen since the 1920s.

It's fine to have your opinion on Silent Film, but don't pretend to know about other films so people will regard your opinion higher.

reply

"Sorry, but anyone who is a "huge buff on silent movies" would know that Gentlemen Prefer Blondes and London After Midnight are both lost prints that nobody has seen since the 1920s."

I love it, great response! Claiming to have have seen films that you have not in order to give legitimacy to your opinion is just sad.

reply

Interesting that you should bring that up. Mel WANTED to do it in black and white, but the studio thought it'd be "funnier" in color.

reply

Interesting that you should bring that up. Mel WANTED to do it in black and white, but the studio thought it'd be "funnier" in color.

I personally think it works better in colour because it is about making a silent movie in 1976.

reply

I think if you grew up when these movies came out you'll find it funnier than someone just watching them today. Comedy was much different back then, it was funnier then. To those who saw it then, it's still funny because they grew up with that style of humor. To the younger folks like myself it's not as funny.

Personally I found it watchable but like young frankenstein, not really a movie I laugh at. I love Mel but the older movies are just not as good to me. I prefer Spaceballs any day of the week. I saw it as a kid twice at the drive-in (yeah, i said it...). I think blazing saddles is the funniest of the older movies though I admit I haven't seen them all. I'm watching them about once a month. If this hadn't been on cinemax this morning it would have been a few more weeks. Now I can take it out of my netflix queue after it gets it's 3 stars...

reply

[deleted]

I have not seen this movie, but I loved Blazing Saddles. SAFM, if you haven't seen that movie, please rent it ASAP.

_____________________________
"You...went into outer space. You?"
"Sure. You've never been?"

reply

i just watched for the first time today, and i thought it was pretty funny. i thought it was creative, and it had a lot of funny spoofs and jokes.

reply

I didn't find this movie funny at all. I absolutely love The Producers, Blazing Saddles, Young Frankenstein and Spaceballs but this was really below average. Worst Brooks film I've seen.

reply

Purely subjective but I think "Dracula: Dead and Loving It" is thr worst Mel Brooks movie ever. "Silent Movie" has a few good laughs and chuckles - it is not as good as his true classics but it is decent.

Jerry at the Movies
http://www.geocities.com/faustus_08520/Jerry_at_the_Movies.html

Films are not reality. Reality is not film. Film is only an approximation of reality.

reply

All comedy is totally subjective and arguing about what is funny and what isn't is pointless. Having said that, you have still managed to be totally wrong by not liking it. In my spare time, I help a doctor of philosophy with his urine collections, so my opinion is tops. Don't fight it, tiger.

http://www.thebreakingnews.co.uk./
NOW UP! 'Paris In Prison! Hilton In The Big House! Prison Porno Tape?' 'Paparazzi v's Stars! It's War!' + 'Fat V's Skinny! Is Slim Still In?' + More!






reply

I just watched it and I would have to say that I also loved it. The only people I can see not liking this are the modern audiences spoiled by modern sound films. There are lots of inside jokes about silent films that modern audiences wouldn't get either. I agree that this is one of Brooks's smarter films but too smart for the average viewer.

reply

I totally agree with lowriderlarry. It depends a lot on what you grew up watching, but personal taste also is a huge factor.

This movie does a sight gag involving Henny Youngman. He is sitting in an outdoor cafe with a bowl of soup when the VW Beetle with the huge fly on its roof makes a quick left and the fly winds up hitting his bowl of soup. He turns and signals the waiter. Henny Youngman was known for his one-liner comedy in the Catskills. One of the ones that made him famous was "Waiter, what's this fly doing in my soup" Waiter: "The backstroke."

Combine that with the only spoken word in the entire movie being forcefully spoken by the most famous mime of all times, Marcel Marceau, a performer who based his entire professional career being silent, and what you have is a work of genius. When I first saw it in the theatre way back when, I laughed myself silly. As a result of the brilliance of those two scenes, I still tell people about them. Some people "get it" and some don't.

reply

Ah yes, another internet expert explaining why I didn't like this movie. Well, explaining why someone else didn't like it actually because I did like it, sort of, not as funny as Young Frankenstein or Blazing Saddles but infinitely better than Spaceballs.

If I have to read the book to help explain the movie that tells me the movie failed

reply

I may have outgrown this movie but it's still funny.









"'Extremely High Voltage.' Well, I don't need safety gloves, because I'm Homer SimpsonZZZZZZZzzzzzzz--" - Frank Grimes

reply

I guess being a big fan of his films also means you don't know *beep* about his style. Ironic, isn't it?

reply

Silent Movie is the "Superbad" for Adults...

reply

OK, it's not BLAZING SADDLES or YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN, but I think "Unfunniest Movie of ALL TIME" is a little harsh.

reply

I remember when this film came out in June of 1976. I saw it three times in movie theaters and each time it got huge laughs from large and happy audiences. I was able to buy a print of it at one point and it got a great reaction at screenings in my home. It's not quite as good as "Young Frankenstein," but in my estimation it's better than "High Anxiety" or any of the films which followed.

reply

I might add that it helps to understand that this film was made during a rash of "nostalgia" pictures for the 20s and 30s that began with "The Sting" in 1973, and included films such as "The Great Gatsby" (1974), "The Front Page" (1974), "Bugsy Malone" (1976), and also included really dreadful pictures such as "Won Ton Ton: the Dog that Saved Hollywood" (1976). "Silent Movie" came in late in the craze, but combined with the success of Brooks' previous two films, did good box office. The comparative failure of his next film, "High Anxiety", suggests that many of the audiences that came to "Silent Movie" were perhaps a bit disappointed, and decided to skip the next Brooks film (which is ashame, because "High Anxiety" is a wonderfully weird comedy that is rather overlooked).


____
View my films at: www.youtube.com/comedyfilm

reply

Great film. If you want to see truly bad Brook's films..he made three.

Men in Tights

Life Stinks

and Spaceballs

The rest of his films are classic comedy films.

Terminate this Thread with extreme prejudice.

reply

The rest of his films are classic comedy films.


"Dracula: Dead and Loving It" is a classic?

"My brain rebelled, and insisted on applying logic where it was not welcome."

reply

And spaceballs and men in tights were bad films?


no.

reply

"Men In Tights" really is no good. I think if Mel were in it more, it could've been better though. "Spaceballs" is OKAY. Mel is good in it anyway...and the ending is funny. It's not his best work though.

I don't know...I find it funny how people can mock "Silent Movie" and praise the latter day films, like "Men In Tights", and such. "Silent Movie" was made during the prime period. I think once his usual "stock company" stopped starring in the movies, things started to go south, at least in my view. I mean..."High Anxiety", "History of the World Part I", etc ... were all made after some of his bigger "classics", and they are still WONDERFUL. But it's because they still have more of the Mel Brooks feel about them. The later ones...I don't know...I feel like they lose something. I guess it really comes down to...if "Spaceballs" was the first Mel Brooks movie you ever saw....then it is good. If "Young Frankenstein" is the first one you saw...then...well....you expect more from the man, ya know?

Either way...even his lesser films are better than most people's haha.

~Angela

"I don’t see vulnerability as a flaw. I see it as a manifestation of humanity." ~ Marty Feldman

reply

Probably the funniest movie ever, just ahead of Borat and Me, Myself and Irene (the original cut, not the more PC version on DVD). But I can see how people born around the time it was made would miss much of the humor.

A lot of the gags are riffs on the culture of that time. Humor generally requires familiarity with a culture -- tragedy, tho, is said to be more universal. And perhaps sentiment. _Best Years of Our Lives_ may still resonate well with people of all ages.

When Dom and Marty begin to fiddle with the monitor in the patient's room in the hospital, it suddenly turns into a game of Pong. They play furiously, and the patient twitches accordingly.

Pong was the new video game then. But who remembers Pong?

Do children still have alphabet blocks?

Is everyone as aware that a leading movie star, Paul Newman, was also a serious race driver?

Is Henny Youngman's face instantly familiar?

One of the amazing things Brooks does in this movie is telegraph some jokes. This inverts a common rule of comedy. You're supposed to take 'em by surprise.

But from the second encounter Dom has with the Coke machine, you know exactly what's going to happen. And you're sort of trapped there, mingling incredulity with a kind of helplessness, "Brooks isn't _really_ going to do that, is he?" And of course he does. And it builds an even bigger laugh.

Same with the giant fly. The camera cuts to the exterminator truck with the enormous mockup of a fly on its roof. It cuts to Henny Youngman arriving at an outdoor cafe. It cuts to the furious car chase, the limo pursuing the heroes. It cuts to the truck. Then to Youngman sitting at a table. Back to the chase. To the truck. To Youngman speaking to the waiter. To the chase. To the truck. To Youngman receiving a bowl of soup. To the chase... And for what seems an eternity, you know exactly what Brooks is going to do, you marvel at his chutzpah, and the laugh builds. It's almost like a magician showing you exactly how he's going to do the trick, and astonishing you anyway.

That said, any comedy suffers the second time around because you already know the jokes. You can appreciate it for its technique, but that first laugh, extracted by surprise, is already extracted.

But it still has me chortling over it, well after seeing it. A few good comedies can do that, if the gag is good enough. Borat, Tropic Thunder too, I think.

Some are funnier in retrospect. The scene of the actors in medieval armor struggling in the studio canteen was funnier in idea than as it played. The same gag in _Married to the Mob_ somehow worked better. Yet both are very funny.

One problem is that Brooks himself isn't as interesting an actor as he is a director. He did well in _High Anxiety_, but I think Madeline Kahn elevated him, and carried him. He's fine in vignettes, but here he's at the center of the movie. It being silent, it doesn't call on him as much. Doing his famous two-hander with Carl Reiner, the 2000-Year-Old Man series, Brooks of course was brilliant. He was brilliant in all the things he did with Reiner. But at the center of a feature film like _Young Frankenstein_, I think Gene Wilder does even better.

reply

[deleted]

Aww come on now, Men in Tights and Spaceballs (I've never seen Life Stinks) were decent films for what they were. Of course they're not the greatest films of all time.. They're supposed to be light, funny, and a little stupid, it's the comedy style.
I liked Silent Movie, I was watching it very late at night when I was very tired, and maybe I wouldn't have liked it under any other circumstances, but it's amuzing in that light way.
I loved the scene where they were all in suits of armor trying to sit down with Liza Minelli XD

reply

Not that Blazing Saddles and Young Frankenstein were all that great either.

reply

A sensible comment.

I am a four eyed evil genius.

reply