Yep. That's the book. Just reading it now. I think the upshot of the story is that Lithgow ended up feeling pity for an old-school movie star nearing the end of his career, still playing old movie tricks to make the filmmaker favor him in the final edit (rather odd, considering that Robertson was the actual star of the movie).
The other thing that I find interesting is that I like Robertson's performance in this film, and remember that when I saw the film in the late '70s I thought Lithgow's performance was amateurish. Perhaps it was because Robertson's tricks undermined Lithgow's confidence in himself (Lithgow goes into some detail in his book about his confidence problems), and he overcompensated with a too-theatrical performance. Also, Lithgow had hardly any film experience at the time, certainly compared to Robertson. But I will also say that this is not the only negative report on Robertson that I've seen; read Michael Caine's book What's It All About for an account of working with Robertson on Too Late the Hero when Robertson was up for his Oscar on Charly. Caine, of course, doesn't avoid naming Robertson in his story.
I will point out one more thing; Robertson was not the only actor to play tricks like this to force the editor to favor him. Glenn Close in her interview in "Inside the Actor Studio" levels the same charge against Robert Redford during the making of The Natural.
reply
share