Enough Sex?

This thread is a prime example of how americans like to project their sexual hang-ups on just about everything and everyone but themselves. This is, of course why sexual imagery is the top selling advertising gimmick in america. Please unload your prudish projections on your shrink and spare everyone else so it isn't perpetuated to yet another generation. kthnx

The sex was a very small part of this film and it was wholly appropriate, get a grip on yourselves, gawd!

wow, ur either gay or a girl, or psycho...

[deleted]

It really had that much sex and nudity in it ? isn't the movie about and alien coming to earth to find water for his dying planet ? What are these aliens sexually probing people ?

"Movie directing is the perfect refuge for the mediocre"

I don't get the problem many people have with sex. We all do it. Luckily.
Violence, though, seems to be acceptable. God knows why.
This film is a masterpiece and yes, the sex was needed, as it shows the protagonist's only way of relating to humans.
I guess many who have problems with the sex scenes are Americans.
Enough said. :)

Sex and sexual provocation in movies - outside porn - and in regular life is WRONG. (By 'regular life', I mean 'family-friendly events, places, transactions et cetera', the public life of people - not the private life)

Too bad that modern people don't understand this fact, or why it is wrong - which is why we are living in such a mess of a world, where no one knows or understands the good values anymore. Murder and death is 'cool', wearing a Nazi SS Death Cult symbol, the symbol of worshipping the demon called Moloch on your shirt is considered NORMAL these days.

I could go on about how twisted, perverted, and horror-lusting these so-called 'humans of Earth' have become (though I'd call them more accurately 'ape/sheeple-demons of Terra'), but to get back to the main point, I'd like to explain a little bit how it works, in the vain hope that someone here might be actually then able to grasp it and realize it is indeed wrong.

I mean, there is a time and place for everything. You don't go selling computers into a hospital, using a loud voice. You don't go to police station to eat a three-course meal and ask the constable to bring you dessert.

There is porn and sex for orgasm-purposes, there are all kinds of equipment and toys to help reach that goal. That's all fine. I don't mind that at all. But it shouldn't be shoved to people's throats when they are not expecting it - it should be hidden from 'regular life' (and 'regular' movies). Having sex or watching porn or other sexually provocative material should ALWAYS be a choice, not a happenstance.

What makes the problem difficult to see is a bunch of other problems, like the constant misandry and keeping men sexually starved. Women's hypergamy is not being kept check like it used to be, but CELEBRATED and ENCOURAGED. As a result, most men can and will never have enough sex, while women have way more sex than they can ever indulge in.

This misandry and the state of affairs is used to manipulate men with sex. Its done shamelessly everywhere. Men are shown visual and aural things that affect their sex module directly, whether the men want it or not (men can't control this effect - otherwise a population wouldn't even exist, or at least it would be considerably smaller). It's a weakness in men's biological-etheric sexual functionality that is ruthlessly exploited and shamelessly abused to get men on their knees.

Because men are so unnaturally sex-starved, most men will do almost anything to get sex and even get some kind of pleasure out of being sexually provoked (and they have of course been systematically indoctrinated to have that response, so the exploitation could go on).

As a result, you get men who want more exploitation, because they have become hooked on it - they are sex-starved, and they feel sexual stimulation every time they see naked boobies or people having sex on screen. You could say that a lot of them have gone a bit mad, always worshipping and rejoicing any sexual exploitation that they have been targeted for.

You really need to back off from the situation and see it from a wider perspective - otherwise you easily just see a couple of boobies, and think that it can't be all that harmful.

The (planned) side effect is, that most men, being constantly sexually stimulated and provoked, walk around being horny most of the time, not being able to accomplish anything signifigant, not being able to focus on the world's problems, not being able to even see what's going on, what the people in power are doing (and not doing), and thus are easily controlled and manipulated into submission. They will latch onto any ugly, nasty twat as long as they get the slightest bit of intimacy.

How often do we have to see the sad couple that everyone of us must have seen (except the blind, perhaps) out there, whether it's supermarkets, shopping malls, on the streets, parks, etc.? Why must the sad couple exist, and why must it be such a common occurrence?

Sad couple. A man who is completely pussy-whipped by a nasty, angry, ugly, fat, old, wrinkly, foul-smelling demon-of-a-hag. A man, who once stood straight with a glimmer of hope in his eyes, now getting older, his shoulders slumping and his posture and weak voice telling that the woman controls the man nearly 100%. That man will never invent a new cure for anything, that man will never go on exploration trips with his friends or alone, that man will never fulfill any of his dreams. That man will only 'survive' (if that) the horrible relationship that he has imposed upon himself because he was manipulated throughout his life.

When I was in a hormone-controlled, stupid, teenage body, I would have celebrated every nipple and tittie you could have shown me in any movie or TV show - or basically anywhere! I thought there was never enough porn, and it was a rarity to see anything sexual.

But now that I can see how it all works, why it works that way, and the causes and effects, I see that it's actually wrong to manipulate men that way. Everyone always talks about exploitation of women, but it's really exploitation of MEN. No one forces any woman to be naked (well, you'd be hard-pressed to find anyone who does) in the front of a camera, but men are lured, manipulated and exploited using the weakness I mentioned earlier - that's why women have so much sexual power.

That weakness has been artificially enhanced, and the situation worsened by not trying to protect men from being attacked and manipulated this way, but instead claiming that it's the women that have to be protected, and laying a guilt trip on the already manipulated men!

Once your hormones stop controlling you, and you are free to think, you can see the horror of it all - you can see that one pair of titties is much like the other, and nipple is just a (usually) red protuberance.

The world would be a better place, if men weren't manipulated into slavery for women. If porn and sex had their own places, but outside those places, sex would never be seen, shown, or heard of. That way whenever you want it, you can easily get it, but no one who doesn't want it, would ever have to suffer from it.

I think the peeing scene (and the other unnecessary sex scenes) in this movie was horrible, disgusting, and does not add to the story, excitement or even immersion in any way - it's such an obvious gimmick anyway, and her acting is so awful. The only thought it brings to an aware viewer is: "Eeeww, was that REALLY necessary?". For which I commend the original poster - it's hard to go against the flocks and herds of horny apes and demon-sheeple.

A horny man is easy to control, especially by a woman, or by using a woman. So all these movies do is keep men horny and thus easy to manipulate and control.

Ordinary movies, and good stories, in _NO_WAY_ need any sexual content in them. To be exciting, to be interesting, to be immersive, or to be fascinating. No sex is needed for that.

And hollywtf: NO ROMANCE IS NEEDED, EVER!

But we constantly get this 'injected romance' syndrome, ruining otherwise potentially interesting or exciting premises, movies, plots, stories, etc. It's really sickening. Don't cater to women so much - have some things for ONLY MEN also! Where's the equality, when there are zillions of "For women only"-movies that most men couldn't stomach (I bet even many gay men wouldn't be able to - if only for the predictability, the stupidity of the plotlines, etc.), but the supposedly "men's movies" are ALSO injected with 'romance' so much that they have become pretty much the same thing - women's movies!

An obvious example of a movie and a story that is completely obliterated by injected romance, and which in NO WAY needed it, is "Time after Time" (though that movie suffers a lot from many other problems as well).

What's the point in having 'romance' in pretty much EVERY (mainstream) movie? It's just as annoying as if there was synchronized swimming injected to every single movie. What kind of a sense would that make? NONE! But if people had been growing up with those movies, most people would think synchronized swimming just BELONGS to any story and movie. But it doesn't. Romance is exactly like that - it doesn't BELONG in most movies!

You HAVE already movies for 'romance', why can't you have movies purely for 'action', 'comedy', 'sci-fi', 'thriller', and whatnot? WHY?

I know, the matriarchy's fema-fascist men-hating agenda plus catering to women brings more moloch's moolah ...

Sickening.

In the '70s, we had sex and nudity. Today, we have gratuitous violence. I prefer the former.

Off to the priesthood with you!