Remake
BLUE SUNSHINE is prime material for a remake.
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=7100585
http://www.ymdb.com/nightthing/l27681_ukuk.html
BLUE SUNSHINE is prime material for a remake.
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=7100585
http://www.ymdb.com/nightthing/l27681_ukuk.html
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEEEEEEEEEEEZ...LEAVE THIS CLASSIC ALONE!
share
OK, Okay, Okaaaaaaaaaaaaay... I will.
But, it would still be a classic if it was remade, badly or otherwise.
Remakes don't hurt the original film in any way - just like Stephen King replies when asked how he feels about Hollywood ruining his stories: They aren't ruined, they're still sitting nicely on the shelf (or something similar).
The point being, allow stories to be adapted/remade for different times, it can't disparage the original work (if it's good) in any way and we might come out with another classic.
Look at the two versions of CAPE FEAR (adapted from The Executioners by John D. MacDonald). The remake doesn't cancel out the original, just as the earlier film doesn't make the novel any less of a gripping read. (Scorsese himself has said that he feels that CAPE FEAR could be updated for every generation or so.)
I remain open to the idea of remaking a classic (or a semi-classic, or a cult) film because you never know they just might make something as worthy as - or better than - the first (see Carpenter's THE THING and Cronenberg's THE FLY).
If not, then we've always got the original to treasure (see Hooper's TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE, Carpenter's ASSAULT ON PRECINCT 13 and Romero's DAWN OF THE DEAD).
Personally, I'm looking forward to Brad Anderson's remake of George Romero's THE CRAZIES (which I love).
THE NIGHTHING
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=7100585
http://www.ymdb.com/nightthing/l27681_ukuk.html
" ... if It ain't broke , then don't try to fix-It!"
share
First of all 40 years have no passed since the LSD 1960s and it wouldnt be scary to watch a bunch of 60 and 70 year old bald crazy people running around ... "Mommy ... whats wrong with Grandpa?" ... "oh, Grandpa use to do something called "Acid" when he was a young man" ... this would be totally silly.
Or else people would be running around from all the E they use to drop during there rave days? In which case it would be 28 Days later set to The Prodigy or something? lol
peter webber bought the filmrights with mgm.then he made hannibal rising,and saw his rights of blue sunshine expire.
shareYou couldn't actually remake this film, it worked because it was the evil bastard idiot cousin of the Big Chill, incidentally a much lesser movie then this classic (in my opinion).
Anyway, drug use is too widespread these days and we have scene the side effects of using hallucinogenic's for at least 40 years now, and what were people doing ten years ago? Woodstock '99 ... or something ... so we all go mental and start listening to Limp Bizkit and NOFX?
thats not scary at all, that would just be goofy ... and being bald in the 1970s was scary enough! Now female celebrities shave there head on screen and off and resemble the Manson family girls enterting that court room years ago more and more.
All very good points, Levi. (And "the evil bastard idiot cousin of The Big Chill" description is golden.)
However, good or bad, remakes put a spotlight on the original film - I'd just like to see a little attention paid to this under-known '70s gem.
THE NIGHTTHING THEATRE - Now with 17% more baaaadness!
Actually, you are wrong. In the 80s, there were a large number of designer drugs created in labs by budding drug dealers/chemists. They rewrote the chemical structures of current drugs to create drugs with similar effects but were not listed as controlled substances; all of this with the hopes that if push came to shove, they could beat drug charges. Those "users" would now be in their 40s and 50s and would be in positions of control and power. Prime material for a remake with the same political undertones of the original film.
I love the original, but, in the right hands, this could be a wonderful remake.