how did Robards win an Oscar?


he was hardly in it. I didn't hardly notice him in the film at all! Redford and Hoffman were better by an absolute mile. I don't understand why he won?

reply

How did Robards win an Oscar for Best Supporting Actor? The same way he won Best Supporting Actor from the NY Film Critics, the National Society of Film Critics and the National Board of Review - by giving an excellent performance.

I think it's outrageous that the performances of Redford and Hoffman were overlooked by so many in 1976, but that doesn't mean Robards wasn't brilliant.




BRADLEE: Garage freak? Jesus, what kind of crazy fu*king story is this?!

reply

Robards was definitely the scene stealer of this film. This happens often in movies with outstanding ensemble casts -- most of the actors give even, effective, workmanlike performances, and ONE of them gets to sink their teeth into the juiciest of all the roles.

Think Ben Affleck in "Boiler Room," Kate Hudson in "Almost Famous" or Joe Pesci in "Goodfellas." Those are just a few that come to mind.

That's Robards in "All the President's Men."

reply

[deleted]

Lovely sarcasm. I'm sure you found it necessary. However, I said from ensemble casts, as opposed to films resting on the shoulders of a pair -- or perhaps just one -- actor(s). "Boiler Room" is an excellent niche movie for people in my age bracket, and it's CERTAINLY a textbook example of an ensemble cast. Many consider it the finest performance of Affleck's career, and his talent is nothing to simply sweep under the rug with snark.

reply

[deleted]

OK, I'll admit, I've never seen Boiler Room. So, strictly judging Affleck on his other performances I've seen him in, I find it hard to believe he was Oscar worthy. I'll get around to renting Boiler Room one of these days, and give a more accurate opinion then. I've never thought of Affleck as a "great" actor. I think he shines more in directing.

reply

big ben from 'problem child' is in this!



His name...was Julio Iglesias!

reply

I never said it was Oscar worthy. I was focusing on ensemble casts and those are the first few films that came to mind. I do believe (along with his work in "Good Will Hunting") that Affleck's performance in "Boiler Room" was one of the best of his career. That doesn't necessarily make it Oscar worthy.

However, Alec Baldwin had a similar role in "Glengarry Glen Ross," and though Baldwin's performance has more acclaim, I personally prefer Affleck's. I think he looked as comfortable, or more comfortable, than ever.

reply

[deleted]

You made the association. I never said anything about Affleck and Oscar. You were focusing on the Academy Awards and I was focusing on ensembles. I never connected the two in writing, nor did I mean to. I had just seen Boiler Room on Starz and it was an interweaving cast that came to mind.

reply

[deleted]

Tommy Lee Jones won a Best Supporting Oscar for a similar type of role in The Fugitive.

Both Robards' and Jones' performances exude authority, and both actors deftly embody the required characteristics that is necessary for these type of hardcore professionals to function in their given careers.

I think Robards wholly deserved his Oscar.

reply

But in the Fugutive after Tommy Lee Jones's character is introduced you see twice as much of him as Harrison Ford, the lead! Robards almost seems like he is doing a cameo

reply

Some supporting roles are of substantial size, though they still aren't the leads. Some are one or two scene "cameos". In either case the part generally goes to an actor who specializes in this kind of character part. Robards played his share of leads when he was younger: ICEMAN COMETH, THOUSAND CLOWNS, etc. When he got older he did character work like ATPM and JULIA, his other Oscar winner.

As for the Oscars, the supporting awards are voted on separately from leads. It says nothing about Redford and Hoffman's work that they didn't win Oscars and Robards did. And Robards part is a pretty big one. Hal Holbrook has only 3 scenes; who else has more than Robards?

reply

Agree with the above comments and would add Lauren Bacall for "Mirror Has Two Faces." And, she just happens to be Robards' ex.

Kate Hudson was "robbed." That loss still bugs me.

reply

Olivier in MARATHON MAN was one of the hammiest and most unconvincing performance ever given by a major actor

reply

[deleted]

Because he is a great actor you moron and Judi Dench won an Oscar for very few minutes of screen time in SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE--his performance is so beautifully real and powerful with no effort whatsoever--if you can't notice him then you are without any ability to see excellence at at work

reply

[deleted]

Not only was it a stellar performance and a veritable scene stealer, I bet you the scene that gave him the Oscar was the wordless one with "the look". At he Post, when Woodward and Bernstein hands over their collective work to Bradlee for evalution, and Bradlee concludes with "You didn't get it".

And Bernstein tries to argue with him, and Bradlee just gives him this look that totally dries him up. That look said everything. "You didn't get it on paper! You don't have anything! There isn't a story!" And Bernstein completely dries up, as he totally understands the point, and he can't even say anything about it. They didn't get it, and he knows it. That look gave Robards the Oscar.

It's interesting, because it's also a handing of the torch, so to speak. The old guard, Jack Warden, Martin Balsam, Jason Robards, hands the torch over to the up and coming Dustin Hoffman and Robert Redford. But not before showing what's acting is really about and how it's done.

That look is not only Ben Bradlee telling Woodward and Bernstein how to write a story, it's also Robards telling Hoffman and Redford how to man up and act like real actors do. And it's beautiful. "Howard, they're hungry! Remember when you were hungry?"



reply

[deleted]

And I'm sorry, but I really don't see anything notewort;hy in that scene or any of his others in the film. Maybe he's doing everything the role required but it's still very one-note and one-dimensional.


That's a perfectly valid opinion, but that's all it is - your opinion.

There's no law stating you have to like the same performance everyone else did. But just because you didn't care for Robards' work doesn't mean the people who admired his performance were wrong, or that he didn't deserve the awards he won.

Different strokes for different folks; that's what makes the world go round.

And personally, I thought Robards' characterization was very engaging; I felt he gave one of the most commanding, memorable performances of 1976.

reply

handing of the torch ?

are you joking

brando ,deniro ,pacino ,streep
nicholson ,day lewis ,hoffman ,nicholson ,olivier penn are the best

brando in the 50s

deniro pacino and streep in the 70s onwards

day lewis in the 90s onwards

robards is a fine actor but he was not oscar worthy in ATPM

his performance in JULIA on the other hand was

people adored olivier in marathon man
and they were blown away by meredith in rocky
imo the vote got split
and robards won for the same reason marisa tomei won for 'my cousin vinny'

reply

robards and the character he played were very alike

olivier and dr. Szell were polar opposites

acting is when you pretend to be somebody else :)

i predict burt young is kinda like paulie in 'rocky'

reply

Acting is not when you 'pretend to be somebody else', it's when you create an entirely different person and inhabit it.

Rbards role in All the Presiden't Men is NOTHING on paper, Robards made that character memorable.

Christian Szell was all there on paper, and was magnificently brought to life by Olivier.

I would still give the nod to Robards, simply because of my own preference for understated before overstated.




Never defend crap with "It's just a movie"
http://www.youtube.com/user/BigGreenProds

reply



olivier was nothing like szell

ben bradlee and robards were very alike

reply

Sorry for offering my opinion. You obviously knew both men personally and I apologise for attemting to give my views.




Never defend crap with "It's just a movie"
http://www.youtube.com/user/BigGreenProds

reply



the leaked tarantino script

hope you like it :)

https://anonfiles.com/file/ba77fe6f664d451a4725fbcca0846f67

reply

IMO Robards deservedly won the best supporting actor Oscar.

Even if they'd been nominated, which they weren't, Hoffman and Redford would have been in a different category and competing against one another, not Robards.

In that respect, I think the OP is asking us to compare apples and oranges.

reply

[deleted]

Well, it is, but only in the same way that baseball is hitting a ball with a piece of wood.

Saying acting is just 'pretending to be someone else' is, I suppose, a great way to over-simplify the craft.



Never defend crap with 'It's just a movie'
http://www.youtube.com/user/BigGreenProds

reply

For one, Jason Robards has been around the block for years. His style of acting has always been a pitch perfect delivery. Every time you see his face, you know how far deep in the part he really is. Either during his meetings with his co-actors in the boardroom to try and see if the story will fly. Not to mention the fact that his persona fit the character to a perfect 'T'. In the real world, this is how the editor was seen as, a gruff, raspy, moody, and all too often brash individual who wants results.

Compare it to Bernstein, and Woodward. Who for the most part, were actually juvenile reporters that got incredibly lucky when they investigated the Water gate conspiracy. Before that they were the typical duo who got stories under rugs at parties, or other forms of functions where dirt might be the norm. I do have to hand it Redford, and Hoffman for their performances. Each have a unique delivery style all their own, which can clash at certain points. Given that they were younger in the days of glory films such as this.

But to make things fair, each could have won an oscar. But it is the audience reactions that makes oscar's available to actors. Jason just wrapped the audience around his finger is all. Nothing more, and nothing less. I was even impressed with his acting in the film, very natural, very daunting, and extremely stoic. Not all can perform like that, and he nailed it perfectly.

reply


The scene I think seals it for him is the dirty look he gives hoffmans character when they are debating which story to lead with, its a memorable scene stealer.
DODGE THIS!!!!!

reply

[deleted]