Poopie-plops


Is there anybody out there?

Oh, I'm so thrilled that the Dallas PBS station has begun a re-broadcast of Reginald Perrin! I didn't get where I am today without praising good t.v. when I see it. It's on at 10:30 p.m. Saturday nights in Dallas and surrounding municipalities.

I'm not certain. Is the proper superlative for this series "great" or "super"..?

I haven't seen this show in almost 30 years, but it's just as funny as I remembered.....Actually, it's funnier now. When I saw it in '79 or '80, I thought Reggie was a sad, goofy guy who might have been my father.....Now, I see Reginald Perrin as, well, he's sort of ME!

Oh, I have to go now because "There's poopie-plops in me panties." (Episode 2, Safari Park).

Kind Regards,

Lady, the god YOU pray to is too busy being indicted for tax fraud.

reply





Reading that poopie-plops quote reminded me that the kids' voices always sounded very unrealistic - as though they were dubbed by an adult woman. What do you think?





My body makes no moan
But sings on:
All things remain in God.

reply

The kids voices totally bugged me too - I didn't understand why they did it that way until I started listening to a lot of British radio shows from the 1970s and noticed that they almost always used a woman to do the voices of kids. Maybe that was just the convention at the time and no one realized how false it'd sound 30+ years later, when we're used to more 'realistic' depictions of kids.

Actually, the lack of 'realistic-ness' started to really bug me after a while. I ended up watching all the episodes in order over the course of a week or two, and while I could suspend my disbelief about the raging success of GROT and even about the health commune thing - but if you and your wife owned a hugely successful chain of 50 stores, would you really still be living in THE SAME HOUSE as you did when you were middle management? Given that it would take a few years to go from 1 store to 50 stores to no stores to a health commune, would your living room look EXACTLY the same? Heck - would your wife still have the same HAIRCUT?

I know, I know - everyone's going to say that the show wasn't supposed to be 'realistic', that it was supposed to be a sort of satirical fantasy exposing the hypocrisy of modern life and existential angst, etc etc. But I think it's much easier to buy in to the overall 'message' the satire is designed to deliver if you aren't distracted by continuity issues like "Married couples who own and run a 50-store retail empire don't come home together at 5pm, sit on the couch and then eat a pork-chop for dinner - people who own and run successful retail empires work 20 hours a day and eat out most of the time..."

I think tastes have changed in the past 10-20 years - these days we like more realism and less 'stagey' sets/continuity (there's a huge reality gap between, say, 'Married With Children' vs '30 Rock').

reply




Excellent points, sgw, and nice to see someone willing to criticise a sacred cow.

Perrin is one of my favourite series of all time. All the same, I'm not blind to its faults. Thirty years on, they're more glaring than ever (just as the faults of the 1930s Frankenstein and Dracula are glaring - it doesn't make them anything less than classics).

Perrin looks incredibly stagey, like a link to the age of Wodehouse and people coming in through the French window suggesting tennis. The humour has dated badly - a lot of it is based on repetition which in the light of sharp modern comedy now gets really, really tedious after the first few times (the morning kiss goodbye, the walk to the train station etc).

An aspect of the series that really grated and which wasn't in the books was the reliance on the cheap gag - cue shot of hippo and tuba music, collapse of audience. Rossiter's oft-repeated "OH my GOD!!" would punctuate an otherwise unfunny scene, prodding the audience to laugh.

I still like the catchphrases, Jimmy's especially. But the other supporting characters look very one dimensional, even Perrin's wife.

No doubt some will ask "Well what DO you like about it then?" I think its charm and its originality, which I still remember (notwithstanding that it now looks twee and hackneyed). At the time it was like Python-lite - trying to be anarchic but staying within the bounds of sofa-to-the-foreground, whoops the boss is coming round for dinner Seventies comedy. So it was a brave try but one that hasn't completely stood the test of time.

In the light of all that, the new version with Martin Clunes will be VERY interesting.





My body makes no moan
But sings on:
All things remain in God.

reply

...nice to see someone willing to criticise a sacred cow.
I heartily agree and your own summary matches up with my own feelings about this legendary show as well.

I actually have just watched both series of Martin Clunes Reggie Perrin all the way through for the second time and felt I owed it to myself to try again to see what the genius of the original was all about. I had started on it many years ago and gave up. I suppose you had to have lived through that era yourself to accept the parody or whatever. It seems just too dated to take it in on any level now.

The most generous thing I can offer is that Leonard Rossiter was perhaps a good natural fit for TV comedy of his era and I guess people just loved his work. The idea that Perrin's secretary Joan was quite ready to begin an affair with this balding inept Lothario at the first suggestion right in his home was too creepy to accept.

The Martin Clunes interpretation has held up, albeit for just the six or so years. For this classic version, I shall have to take it in by small doses, only a couple episodes at a time because it's just too "stagey" repetitious and "now looks twee and hackneyed" indeed. I nearly expect Mrs. Slocombe to walk onstage and say something trite about her pussy to Capt. Peacock. The seventies comedies don't really play out well in large doses anymore.

Eeek!!! I'm getting dressed.

reply

Thinking about the same house, the same décor I think this was part of the joke.

WHATEVER Reggie did, suicide, success, failure, pig farming..... nothing changed as HE had not changed. He was wildly flailing about trying to find a reason to enjoy life but NOTHING actually changed. The money came and went but he was still miserable either way. The House and furnishings reflected this permanence.

'tler

reply

Thinking about the same house, the same décor I think this was part of the joke.

WHATEVER Reggie did, suicide, success, failure, pig farming..... nothing changed as HE had not changed. He was wildly flailing about trying to find a reason to enjoy life but NOTHING actually changed. The money came and went but he was still miserable either way. The House and furnishings reflected this permanence.

'tler


YES

I was surprised that the original poster hadn't realised that.

reply

The Martin Clunes Perrin series was not dated. It was not very funny either.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]