MovieChat Forums > Three Days of the Condor (1975) Discussion > I remember reading Redford thought Condo...

I remember reading Redford thought Condor was..


..paranoid nonsense in the 70s. I wonder what he thinks now?

reply

Odd he should say this, especially so close to Watergate . . . regardless, it's his best movie . . .

reply

I agree and that was exactly what I thought when I read it. I think he may have been trying to turn in a different direction though at the time and I suppose he may have thought he was in danger of type-casting himself in the political thriller/drama mold after Condor, All the Presidents Men and The Candidate

reply

Yes, Redford made many fine films . . . however, I'm afraid he only did one great filmic work---yes, you're right---Three Days of the Condor . . .

reply

On that I have to disagree, Three Days of the Condor is my favourite of his films, but Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid and The Natural were great films too.

reply

These film you mention are only passable . . . mildly entertaining . . . yes, I'll give yhou that . . . only Condor flies unto a higher plain . . .

reply

I can't really argue as TDOTC is in my top 5 films (it may move up and down in that 5 from time to time but never leaving it).

reply

I understand completely . . .

reply

The Sting wasn't too bad, either.

This will be the high point of my day; it's all downhill from here.

reply

The Sting was fun, though a bit crude . . . Condor is exquisite!

reply

I still think "BRUBAKER" is Redford's finest screen performance.

reply

>>> his best movie

Disagree. I find Butch and Sting and Africa all far superior.


Spoilers!Spoilers!Spoilers!Spoilers!Spoilers!Spoilers!Spoilers!

reply

None of those rank . . . he had powerful support in each of those films . . . in Condor, he's the sole male lead . . . and carries the production . . . much harder to do . . . yet, he achieved it . . . so he gets high marks . . .

reply

I still like the other movies better, but you make a valid point.


Spoilers!Spoilers!Spoilers!Spoilers!Spoilers!Spoilers!Spoilers!

reply

As a political thriller its stood the test of time and is fun and entertaining. It also shows what a good leading man he was in his prime.

Its that man again!!

reply

Yes . . . and he must carry the production on his own . . . he doesn't have Newman (or Shaw--in The Sting) to fall back on, or Out of Africa, which is more of a Meryl Streep movie . . . in Condor he really earns his salary . . . he keeps it all together . . . even with the odd ending . . .

reply

Really? Well it takes all sorts I suppose and everyone is etitled to their opinion. I presume by Africa you are talking about Out Of Africa, which still makes me cringe every time I think of Meryl Streep's totally over the top accent continually saying 'arrr-freeee-caaaaaaah.. arrr-freeee-caaaaaah'

reply

I'm assuming she was playing someone Danish . . . I guess that's how they pronounce the name of the continent they were inhabiting . . . Redford is not at all memorable in the part . . . though I must say the cinematography was beautiful . . .

reply

Out in Hollywood, for success, they're forced to tow the leftist party line . . .

However, in this film, his character in on the right . . . the reason the war erupts . . .

reply

Wow, all this mention about favorite Redford movies... and no one mentions Jeremiah Johnson

reply

Now that my friend is a great Redford film, in fact it's just a great film full stop - survival in a hostile environment, full of hostile native Americans and psychotic cannibals.

Note to the stupid rednecks

Pick your 'leftist' hatred out of this script you deeply stupid people. Remember - it wasn't the 'leftists' who screwed the economy and got the country into all those wars it can't finish - it was Monkey Boy Bush you dumbasses.

reply

Help me out here....where were the psychotic cannibals in Jeremiah Johnson?

reply

It is nowhere in the film but in real life he ate the livers of dead Crow indians

Liver Eatin Johnson

reply

Now that my friend is a great Redford film, in fact it's just a great film full stop - survival in a hostile environment, full of hostile native Americans and psychotic cannibals.

Note to the stupid rednecks:

Pick your 'leftist' hatred out of this script you deeply stupid people. Remember - it wasn't the 'leftists' who screwed the economy and got the country into all those wars it can't finish - it was your Monkey Boy President Bush you dumbasses.

reply

So do you guys all go to the same banjo playing club or what?

reply

[deleted]

Yawn, back in your box you silly tea party redneck. Still seeing reds under the beds at your age is a little pathetic. We're talking about film here and so it's not just another right wing platform for your stupid juvenile propaganda.

reply

Bush was a Rockefeller Republican . . . worst than any Democratic liberal--believe me!

reply

Paranoid thrillers were the rage in the mid 70s as Watergate was taking place.

Its that man again!!

reply

This so-called "paranoid thriller" though is superbly produced . . .

reply

"Wow, all this mention about favorite Redford movies... and no one mentions Jeremiah Johnson"

Thanks for posting that, I was scrolling down and thinking the same thing, I guess many people can't appreciate a film like that, and that is a shame. It captures a part of Native American history, which predates all other known history in this nation, yet no respect for a great film.

Sad state of society we have here, CIA scandals will seem like a hiccup in the grand scheme of things centuries from now, while the period of the Native American Indian will live for eternity.

reply