MovieChat Forums > Gone with the West Discussion > Something Everyone Should Know About Gon...

Something Everyone Should Know About Gone With the West


Gone With the West and Little Moon & Jud McGraw are NOT the same films. I have seen both films and it seems to me that Gone With the West is the original version (released in 1972?) and Little Moon & Jud McGraw (released 1975) is most definitely its own movie retelling the story (badly) and having footage from Gone With the West (badly) edited in it.

Though it's difficult to say for sure because of absolutely no valid information surrounding the films, my guess is that the producers of Gone With the West were unhappy with the end product in 1972 and possibly held it from release because of embarrassment. Then new footage was filmed of a writer in a modern setting being told the story (which drastically changes for this new version) by a Native American woman, and that is where Gone With the West footage comes and is edited very sloppy (showing shots from completely different scenes in the film and trying to make it appear that it's happening at the same time). Perhaps the goal of this later version was to make the film a bit more normal and Western-ish, for I'm sure the original version is quite strange to some people, but they made a tragic mistake.

If you saw this film as Little Moon & Jud McGraw then you did NOT see the right film. Try to find it as Gone With the West and see what it was truly meant to be.

I thought everyone should know this because I saw Gone With the West first and am completely in love with it. But Little Moon & Jud McGraw is just awful with its badly edited footage and horrible new music score. I don't want anyone to watch Little Moon & Jud McGraw and think they're watching Gone With the West.

By the way, James Caan's character was not originally called Jud McGraw. In Gone With the West there is a scene where he is called Jebidiah Kelcy so obviously that was his real name. Of course, that bit of the scene is cut from the other movie.

Damn them for making Little Moon & Jud McGraw!

reply

I just watched both versions : "Gone with the West" and "Little Moon and Jud McGraw"; and I completely agree that "Gone with the West" is far superior, and much more surprising (although, to be honest, I wouldn't count it as a great movie). "Little Moon..." is obviously a new cut of basically the same material, with a new music, a new (remarkably dull) introduction and conclusion (set in modern times), and a narrator's voice added (presumably because many viewers had trouble following the original story). What is most striking, though, is that everything that made "Gone with the West" interesting and surprising has been removed (e.g.: a - very - long girl fight which is clearly a reminiscence of the famous fight between John Wayne and Randolph Scott in "The Spoilers"; also a rather violent wrestling contest, an interesting second degree theme song, and so on...). Strange thing!

reply

I just watched "Little Moon and Jud McGraw" from the 3 Ratpack DVD. The introduction add-on about the reporter has to be at least 1977 or later. The car the reporter is driving is a 1978 Oldmobile Cutlass, so "Little Moon and Jud McGraw" had to be made around or after that date.
Maybe it should have it's own listing, as do many other movies like this. There are many listings of badly hacked together episodes of TV programs offered as "movies", this would fit right in.

*UPDATE*
Seems like the cable channel currently showing this is broadcasting nothing more than the "Rat Pack" DVD which has been around in the public domain for a while now.

Happiness is a belt-fed weapon.

reply

[deleted]

I interpreted the film as a slapstick satiricall comedy of a western.

reply