MovieChat Forums > Female Trouble (1976) Discussion > You people need to wake up!!!

You people need to wake up!!!


This movie is horrible. It is an absolute abomination to anything holy. It is crude, vulgar, and disgusting in every aspect. The only part I liked about the whole damn thing was when they flipped the switch at the end and the credits came up. This movie is about as bad as Maniac. I give this movie a -5. Ulghh is it ever horrible.

reply

I think that, rather, people need to lighten up. Sure, the content is unholy, but it's not really hurting anybody. FEMALE TROUBLE a movie that is for people that are intelligent enough to realize that it is trash and enjoy it for what it is. Furthermore, the trash in Waters' movies usually points out the inequalities and injustices in the world. Grizelda's character in DESPERATE LIVING and the characters played by David Lochary and Mary Vivian Pearce are two of many examples of this type of "depth" in John Waters' early films.

reply

Why would anybody who felt so revolted watch a John Waters film until as he-she?? says "the lights came up". This is the kind of movie you like within the first 5 minutes or turn it off or push ff on the remote- These people just like to have something to complain about. Next time push stop then eject and turn on the Disney channel or TVland.

reply

It is a very strange movie, the kind that you either love or hate, but if you watched the whole damn thing, obviously you are partly to blame. You should have been able to tell two minutes into it that it wasn't your cup of tea.

reply

[deleted]

You all shut up. JUST SHUT UP! It was so disgusting and appalling that I only watched a total of 40 or so minutes of it! I would watch one station and turn it back on for a while then get disgusted! Eventually I just wanted to know how it ended OKAY?! So SHUT UP!!!!

reply

[deleted]

what was so bad about it besides that it's about sex? i wanna see it too.

reply

It's not about sex. There are sex scenes in it (none of them hardcore), but it is not about sex. It is about a girl who runs away from home because she doesn't get cha-cha heels for Christmas from her parents, gives in to a life of crime, and meets her end in the electric chair.

reply

Hmm...Let's be a little more tolerant.

I loved Female Trouble (saw it when it first came out) and Forrest Gump.

There is a place in the universe for all types of films.

reply

homeboogie needs to get laid

you say you'll change the Constitution well, you know, we all want to change your Head

reply

This guy sounds just like a character from one of John's films. His posts make me LOL.

reply

that is some unholy behavior you are practicing there..

reply

by nos_neh_imadeavphacks (Mon Feb 21 2005 14:13:48 )

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You all shut up. JUST SHUT UP! It was so disgusting and appalling that I only watched a total of 40 or so minutes of it! I would watch one station and turn it back on for a while then get disgusted! Eventually I just wanted to know how it ended OKAY?! So SHUT UP!!!!


There really isn't much point in in posting to a bulletin board a message to other people to shut up.

reply

ybrika:

If it truly was so digusting, you wouldn't have continuted watching, regardless of your wantint to see how it ended.

If you look at it in context, you'll see Waters was dead-on right in his assertation back in 1974 that people were obsessed with being famous and that criminal trials were becoming side show spectacles. Crime = Beauty is practiced by people. How many women wrote to Scott Peterson after he was arrested for killing his wife & unborn child?

Call it what you want but it's not all that far off in the point it was trying to make. I personally don't see what the big deal about it being offensive is. The worst thing about it was some of the acting (Divine, however was FABULOUS!).

Next time something disgusts & appals you, stop watching & forget about it. Why bother to come to a board about it?

reply

[deleted]

"I would watch one station and turn it back on for a while then get disgusted! Eventually I just wanted to know how it ended OKAY?!"

When was this ever shown on televison?

reply

Oh my gawd, this response is perfect! It's like a line right out of the movie! This person must have adored it, otherwise they wouldn't have created this art-piece of a post and comment! Such devotion! Original poster, I salute you! You are clearly a true Waters fan! Dawn Davenport would have loved this! I'm in awe.

reply

That's what I did. I hate this movie so much. I watched about maybe 15-20 minutes or so of it, and I kept thinking 'Maybe it'll get better... maybe it'll get better... give it a chance.' But I hated it so hardcore, I just couldn't do it - so I shut it off and now I have trouble thinking about it without feeling disgusted.

I'd just watched Harold & Maude and Bedazzled and Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill! and I thought this movie was going to be in that kind of a range of taste but...

Anyway, not my cup of tea. So if ya don't like it, don't watch it.

reply

This movie is very disgusting. I have watched it six or seven times and it gets more vulgar with each watching. I plan to watch it several more times just to really see how crude it is.

reply

Nos_neh you are not very bright to have seen 40 minutes of any movie by jumping back and forth between channels. How can anyone enjoy anything by watching a film like that? Furthermore if you hated it and it offended your sensibilities why in the world would you have cared how it ended. I think you became secretly engrossed by it. John Waters' film titilated some deep dark primordial urge in you to make you NEED to find out how it was concluded. To bear witness to the orgiastic finale. After you got your jollies you probably smoked a cigarrete and felt the remorse of the truly guilty and decried it as vulgar, crude and disgusting. I would suggest you go to your nearest full length mirror and see the reflection of your true self. It may prove to be disturbing.

Each man kills the thing he loves...la la la laaaa. (Querelle)

reply

yep you are right,"It is crude, vulgar, and disgusting in every aspect." and that's why I like it and you don't ;)

reply

[deleted]

this is the pinnacle of john waters career. he got notoriety from pink flamingos and this is what he did. it is crude, it is vulgar but that is the point. why would you watch any waters film pre 1980 if you can't accept that. for god's sake, don't watch desperate living if you didn't like this. you might doing something irrational.

reply

One thing I will say is that I think people may misjudge Female Trouble if they see it with Pink Flamingos. Pink Flamingos really is unwatchable for me. I've seen it once and would never want to again. According to one article I read, even John Waters says he'd like to remove a scene from it "for Divine's dignity" if he could, the scene where she "goes down on" her son. While I suppose it does deserve credit for making Waters famous, I think it's a pretty mean and nasty film.

But Female Trouble is the funniest movie ever made, as far as I'm concerned. There's nothing else to equal it. And part of the reason I think it's so funny is that it's a sort of relief from the real world. It's not about the real world in my opinion. It makes fun of it in some ways, including some things we normally think of as sacrosanct, like compassion. As I said when I advertised a screening of it once, "It's an attack on everything decent in the world." But I don't think the story is actually about the real world, because it has some contradictions that are unresolvable. In particular, do the Dashers really believe Dawn is beautiful or not? One scene suggests yes, and another suggests no. And then of course there's that hilarious scene where Taffy is upset that Ida doesn't appreciate the hook she got for her. You can't just go down to the corner drugstore and buy a hook for someone.

I agree with the person on this thread who said movies are diverse and no one can judge all of them. I believe Roger Ebert more or less said this one was trash, and he completely misunderstood it. I think he said the acting was bad. But what do you need good acting for? To depict the real world. In this film, the acting is bad when it needs to be (the classmate who rats on Dawn at the beginning) and good when it needs to be (all of Divine's and David Lochary's performances). And while it's true, I assume, that Edith Massey couldn't play Shakespearean roles, she doesn't need to. In every movie I've seen her in, she played one role: Edith Massey! And that was perfect for this film.

reply

[deleted]

I totaly agree with you about your oppinion on Female Trouble but how can you not watch Pink Flamingos I think there pretty much equal in intensity. Hell I watched Pink Flamingos with my mom!

reply

A bad movie isn't based on its content, its based on its craftsmanship.

And this movie, is a masterpeice.

It beats the liquid-eyeliner out of Hairspray.

reply

I agree, it is a masterpiece. I think Roger Ebert, or maybe someone else, said it was poor because the acting was bad, and he completely missed the point. In this film, when the acting needs to be bad, it's bad, and when it needs to be good, it's good. It's brilliantly put together, and there's nothing else as funny as this. I doubt I'll ever find another film I love as much as this one.



"Extremism in the pursuit of moderation is no vice."

reply