The question, at least for me, isn't whether or not Bruce Lee would have approved of the film (yes, I'm sure he would have been less than thrilled by it, and understandably so). The question is why so many fans regard any less-than-heroic depiction of Bruce Lee as a personal affront. I'm not talking about slander, like the Tom Bleecker book ("Unsettled Matters")--that's a horse of an altogether different color. The Betty Ting Pei affair, on the other hand, is well established. And actually, I didn't think Bruce Lee came off too badly in "His Last Days, His Last Nights". Despite the title, he's little more than a peripheral character, and what we do see of him isn't especially offensive: a determined, ambitious guy, a little cocky, who happens to be engaged in an extramarital affair. All those things were true of Lee in real life. (The slow-motion love scenes were tasteless, but one can reasonably assume that Lee and Ting Pei had a physical relationship and not just an emotional affair.) But somehow, I get the feeling that no depiction of Ting Pei's involvement with Lee, regardless of how diplomatically it was handled, would win the approval of Lee's more rabid fans.
Betty Ting Pei was a tacky person who made a tacky film, unquestionably. But the film is much more about her than about Bruce Lee and, consequently, damages her reputation rather than his. Whatever else might be said about her, I honestly don't think she intended any malice--and, judging from her refusal to join the Japanese publicity tour for "His Last Days, His Last Nights", she too was unimpressed by the final product.
reply
share