Suspend your disbelief.


Basically, the whole plot of this film is highly improbable. Why is Deakin allowed the freedom of the train the whole movie? Whom does this benefit? Certainly not the conspirators, who suddenly have all sorts of unforseen problems the minute that he joins the party. After he points out that the Dr. has been murdered, surely they will lock him up. Nope, he still has the run of the train, meddling in every situation that arises. Even if they are too stupid to connect the dots between Deakin and things starting to go wrong, WHAT is their motivation for letting this guy roam around? If I was Fairchild, I'd have exiled him to one of the troop trailers and assigned several soldiers to be responsible for keeping him there. I enjoyued the film, but I have to suspend my disbelief, just like when I watch a sci-fi movie.

reply

The plot was like so many in Alistair MacLean's novels: fast-moving but contrived. A few "holes" have already been discussed and, to some extent, explained. It would have taken very little indeed to throw Deakin's own plans awry - such as being discovered when he was telegraphing the fort.

I'm still not sure how the coupling came to break, but will check that scene again on my recording.

Still, the scenery and cinematography were nice.


reply

Exactly! I think that the far-fetched thrillers are really the best.

~~
JimHutton (1934-79) & ElleryQueen

reply