MovieChat Forums > Thunderbolt and Lightfoot (1974) Discussion > Was the sad ending really necessary?

Was the sad ending really necessary?


He probably would not have died had they gotten him to a hospital. I suspect the beating he received ruptured one of his organs and that he was slowly bleeding internally and had they gotten him to a hospital even one day before he died he might have lived. The surgeons could have saved him. If he was extremely badly hurt as in beyond saving he would not have lasted a few days before dying as he did.

Yes I get it, they were criminals on the run and going to hospital means getting caught but maybe they could have used some of that money to bribe a doctor, make some kind of deal that if they pay the doctor a million dollars he treats my friend's injuries and does not tell anyone. In the movie HEAT Robert De Nero found a doctor to treat his friend Val Kilmer's injury. He was probably a corrupt doctor who did it for under the table bribe money or something.

How many years would he have gotten really? five maybe? Maybe he could have said to his friend "I think I am dying, I need medical care. I am going to turn myself in. Then they could make arrangements to see each other in a few years when he gets out of prison to give him his share of the loot. Being good friends who love each other (this was a bromance movie) there is no danger of Clint not honoring that commitment.

reply

I don't think that Lightfoot himself knew how badly he was hurt. He had always got along on his charm and glibness; he had probably taken a few beatings from angry partners in crime, in his days - but Red was something else, entirely.

Watch Red; from the first time you see him, you can just feel his entire body wound up like a steel spring, waiting to unleash on somebody at the first opportunity.

After Red's kicking, Lightfoot probably thought that it had just been a really savage beating; he didn't stop to think whether there was any real internal damage done. And he seemed to be operating okay when he and Thunderbolt found the money behind the schoolhouse wall. I reckon he was getting internal messages, such as "I feel sick," but they were coming up against other internal messages like "I've been beat up, before," and "Look at all that money!"

I don't think he would have known enough to ask Thunderbolt to take him to professional medical attention.

- Oh, SOMEbody asides me is gonna RUE this here particular day...

reply

Its been a long time since ive seen this film, and my newly ordered blu ray has yet to arrive, but im guessing he died from "intracranial hemmorhage" his speech became increasingly slurred and his eyes lost "direction" ... Jeff Bridges is a great actor!

reply

He died from, as others have mentioned, from a closed head injury, probably a blood clot that as it grew, put pressure on his brain causing his speech and mobility issues. He probably realized it how bad it was too late, and the clot ruptured killing him almost instantly.

Something else, and this is just my opinion, I was talking with a friend not long ago about this movie and other movies of the time, and I came to a conclusion about them saying that "The hero's in the movies were not always the good guys, and sometimes the hero's die in the end". Look at Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, they were the hero's in the movie, Dirty Mary/Crazy Larry, Vanishing Point, Race With The Devil, Easy Rider, to name a few.

1 Baker 11, in pursuit of 1973 yellow Mustang license number 614 Henry Sam Ocean

reply

Why was the sad ending necessary?

Possibly because this movie came out in 1974, which was sort of a "watershed year" for unhappy endings. Even Steven Spielberg shot one of these in '74: The Sugarland Express.

Also:

Chinatown
The Parallax View
The Conversation
Lenny
The Gambler
Godfather II
Earthquake

....they said that "downer 1974" helped bring us Rocky and Star Wars and Superman later in the decade....

reply

It was the 70s. If it came out in the 80s you'd have gotten a bullshit cheery ending.

reply