Don't lie, it's even deserving of an 11.
How can all you people give it such a low score? Did you fail to see the performance of a lifetime by Udo Kier?
Something is not right when this movie is rated so low.
He's a simple scientist.. with a dweeem. And this movie is a masterpiece.
I agree; "Flesh For Frankenstein" is a masterpiece. Have you seen this in it's original widescreen format? It is beautiful and mind blowing! I was thrilled to see that the Criterion label has also recognized this as an important film, and have released a beautiful, restored print. With the exception of 1933's "Bride of Frankenstein," i believe this 1973 film is the best film about the mad Dr. Frankenstein.
"IMdB; where 14 year olds can act like jaded 40 year old critics...'
Have you seen this in it's original widescreen format?Yes.
Having been a nasties fan for years and even enjoying Bloody Moon I decided to finally watch this film. What a load of rubbish !! So tame it's unbelievable ! Give me Argento or Fulci any day !!!!!!!
shareLike Warhol himself, this film is a piece of trash art waiting to be tossed onto a bonfire with illegal copies of the Mona Lisa.
Just my two bits.
I'd rather watch Kung Fu Commandos again, which, not ironically enough, I rented from the same video store as this crap.
This movie changed my life by showing me that sometimes we must *beep* life right in the gale bladder.
share