MovieChat Forums > Black Christmas (1974) Discussion > My theory on who billy was or who the ki...

My theory on who billy was or who the killer was.. SPOILERS


There is such a great chance that Peter was actually the killer. If anybody noticed when Barb was about to die, the slight part of "Billy's" face was shown resembled Peters and also the outline of the hair. Also how could Peter randomly be in the house falling asleep if he was an easy target. Than again when he started calling Jess, he sounded like "Billy" even when he was begging her not to cry about the abbortion. Also all the Agnes talk could have been a name that Peter wanted his kid to be called if the baby was a girl. And the fact the Peter looked sweaty when he tapped on the basement window gave proof that the killer was Peter not billy because it implies he was the one chasing her. So in conclusion I think Peter was the killer. And maybe "Billy" could have existed and could've Been an accomplice.

reply

[deleted]

The producers pressured Bob Clark to end the film with Chris revealing himself as the killer and just before dispatching Jess, saying... "Don't tell them what we did." Chris was the hockey player boyfriend of Clare. Clark refused and went with a more ambiguous ending.

reply

[deleted]

Peter was not the killer. I doubt he was even aware of there being another person in the house. At the end it is quite clear that the killer is still in the house even though Peter is dead.

reply

I have no idea why some people insist that Peter and the killer looked alike, when even in shadow they didn't. I have the latest DVD release where the movie is really cleaned up and Peter looks nothing like the killer. The different eye colors is the best giveaway answer, aside from their similar hairdos and green or greyish sweaters. The red herring was supposed to hold up as strong as it could without losing credibility. Black Christmas is about the paranoia at it's highest.

reply

Exactly.

reply

https://www.flickr.com/photos/128243300@N02/

Please see my post "Photo of Billy"

reply

Yea, just saw this movie twice last winter and I'll admit was a little dumbfounded on who the killer was supposed to be, but then figured out that the film wants the viewer to believe it was Peter so it tried to trick us into thinking that it must be. After watching it a second time and paying closer attention to some of the smaller details, its clear that Billy and Peter are two different people altogether.

reply

[deleted]

So what are you saying? The shadow scenes are supposed to lead to believe it's him. Then you get the eye scene where its obvious it isn't Peter. And even with that much evidence, the film closes with Peter dead and Billy coming out of the attic to probably kill again.

reply

[deleted]

What you did here was creepier than what was in the damn movie. Cripes.

By the way, I am right behind you.

reply

Jesus you people never give up. Peter was killed by Jess and yet we hear the killer in the attic at the end. Bob Clark has said on commentary and DVD special features that it was not Billy. The novelization makes it clear as well.

reply

Despite all the evidence and commentary I have come across unequivocally stating that Peter was not the killer, I could see how someone solely viewing the film could come to that conclusion.

We don't actually see Billy at the end (just the attic door movement). Yes, the silhouette of his hair did resemble Peter's when he attacked Barb. This misdirection was certainly intentional throughout the movie, so much so that Jess presumably kills Peter in self defense (I think that's what we're made to believe, but that was off camera so it's possible Billy could have killed Peter from the back and then started on Jess before the cops showed up and he had to split). We see Peter's anger in the way he bashes the piano, and the caller uses Peter's very words. Even the police officer believes it to be Peter, given these and other circumstances.

But one thing I can't overlook if purely taking into account the scenes in the movie and not any supplemental information, is the fact that the director chose to very clearly show the eye of the killer. It's brown. I couldn't really see Peter's eyes throughout the film because of the low lit scenes he was in, but the only time I did get a good clear look was when we see him sprawled out over Jess, dead. And to me, his eyes are definitely blue.

Sure the movie was ambiguous about some things, particularly the motivation of the killer even though we got some insight and clues from the phone calls. Also, we don't know if the voice at the end really belongs to Billy or some effect used on the viewer. But eye color is not one of those ambiguities.

Peter is not Billy. Sure, he's emotional because he's an artist (which is what Jess first believed and used as an argument to the police). That would explain how crazy he got over failing his recital or his reaction to the idea of abortion. Also, Billy has been stalking the girls for the duration of the film. At the beginning of the film, he enters the house from outside. That doesn't necessarily give us a clue to what degree his stalking could have been executed, but it's very possible, he was watching Jess and overheard the words used by Peter. And Peter being in the house was possible, because the doors were always unlocked. Billy isn't supposed to be some movie monster that is everywhere at once, so for all we know, he could have been following Jess or killing the cop while Peter was inside.

But one thing you can't argue away is the eye color.

reply

Sorry, but that's ridiculous.

reply