MovieChat Forums > Walking Tall (1973) Discussion > Pusser was the villain, not the hero of ...

Pusser was the villain, not the hero of this piece.


As part of an in-home retrospective of 70s drive-in hillbilly flicks we watched Walking Tall last night. I remembered it as most people seem to, the story of a guy who "cleans up" his little town with a big stick and not much else besides the fact that it was loosely based on real-life events. My vague but nostalgic feelings for this flick were gone with the proverbial wind after this viewing.

Just for fun, let's take a look at the story as presented in the film, not the real-life misadventures of Buford Pusser and how they relate to it.

At the beginning of the story, the town and the "State Line Mafia" are existing in a state of equilibrium. The elderly and the blue nosed types have something to cluck over and click their dentures at while the rest of the community go on about their lives and enjoy the services provided at the joints on the county line. The community (both sinners & saints) is also enjoying the prosperity that comes with being a "company town." Then here comes good old Buford...

Pusser is not only an ex Marine but also just retired from a life on the road as a touring wrestler. One can assume that he's seen a bit of the real world at some point. Regardless, his reactions to the horrible horrible "vice den" are right out of a Jack T. Chick tract. It's sadly comical to watch the alternating shots of "vice" and Baker's mugging for the camera in an apparent state of Moral Panic. Didn't see anything like that in the Marines eh Buford? Had to come back home to Bugtussle to find out that people like to drink and screw? He acts like he's about to be overcome with an attack of the vapors when he's forced to interact with a nearly topless woman. Too bad the Lucky Spot didn't offer fainting couches, our man Buford could certainly have used one by that point. Pusser is made out to be so Pure that the script writer didn't even allow him to place the bet that instigated the events of the rest of the film, his buddy had to do it.

From that point we have: Pusser starts a fight because his buddy got cheated at dice and loses the fight. He heals up and goes back with a big stick to get what he feels the joint owes him by breaking up the joint yet again and getting arrested for his trouble. His experiences with "da law" make him realize that the State offers him an even bigger "stick" to abuse his enemies with and he runs for Sheriff. Massive community support (and the fact that he's running against a dead guy) puts a badge on his chest and he proceeds to kick his revenge up a notch now that he's got his own little private army. The inevitable hijinks ensue, and Pusser's wife gets to pay the price for his misguided "crusade."

Quickly bypassing the fact that Pusser is as responsible for his wife's death as if he'd fired the bullet himself, he storms away from her funeral bent on still MORE revenge. Without even bothering to preserve the veneer of state sanction, he drives a car through the Nexus of Evil, luckily only killing two people. Who cares if the place was packed or not? The Moral Minority of McNairy (suspiciously absent for any of the film's gunplay) rushes in and, in a bit of slapstick worthy of Benny Hill, destroys the evil gaming tables. Of course these actions would have been called premeditated murder (or at least vehicular manslaughter) and destruction of private property if they weren't being carried out in the names of Justice, Morality, and Movie Magic.

At what point, exactly, was the audience supposed to be cheering? All of this destruction, chaos, and death over fifty bucks? The one man crusade to (ostensibly) keep Bubba and his cousins from getting a hummer and a beer on a Saturday night? When he gets his dog and his wife killed?

The end result of all of this? Bubba and his pals have to drive a little farther to have a good time, the town goes back to stagnation, and Pusser's young children get to enjoy life without their mother. McNairy would have been much better off if Buford had never returned.

All in all, the film is a brazen morality play that is as transparent as the "punish the sinners" motif of the Friday the 13th films. The big difference is that the villain packs a stick instead of a machete and the audience is apparently meant to cheer his actions instead of hope for his eventual demise.

At present nothing is possible except to extend the area of sanity little by little.

reply

In the film, much of it seems fictionalized. At the end of the day the little clique running the town were crooked.

Its that man again!!

reply

The "State Line Mafia was a bunch of lowdown killers. Anyone that thinks that they were a bunch of good ol boys is wrong.

reply

having just watched the movie, it's seems to me either you're joking, or misremembering the events in the movie to support your assertion. Such as Buford didnt start the bar fight - he only caught the guy cheating, and since his friend was using his money, he was being cheated too (he says that). The bar owners started the fight, stole his car, and essentially left him to die. They also later killed the other guy, and routinely robbed customers who passed out from drinking.
The townspeople were not happy with the sheriff and judge. Buford didnt simply run against a dead guy. He ran against the sheriff before the sheriff tried to kill him but died in the attempt.
First thing he did as sheriff was to close a moonshine operation responsible for killing several black people with poisoned liquor. Something his predecessor wouldnt have done since he was part of the gang.

reply

The OP must have relatives who were jailed by Pusser. I live in Tennessee and grew up in that era and near there. Of course the writers take some liberties (has anyone ever seen a movie based on a true story that didn't add a little for entertainment value?). Rural counties (including my own) were notorious for pay-offs, moonshine, crookedness at all levels and dangerous hell holes in "the bottoms" as we call them (b\c they're located in the bottom part of the county near the Mississippi River. I've heaed stories growing that made me swear off those places. Beer joints filled with god-knows-what and known for fights, rednecks and moon littered the counties so don't tell me this didn't happen or that the bad guys were just innocent bystanders...

reply

We get it your a liberal and you like your criminals to do as they please.
If caught they get a slap on the wrist.

reply

"All in all, the film is a brazen morality play that is as transparent as the "punish the sinners" motif of the Friday the 13th films. The big difference is that the villain packs a stick instead of a machete and the audience is apparently meant to cheer his actions instead of hope for his eventual demise."

That's actually a good point as the appeal of Buford is that is comes across a little like Jason - an unstoppable machine bent to avenge a crime he really had no involvement in to begin with. After a while, it was Jason killing anyone that even goes near Crystal Lake and beyond. The other big thing is that Jason was treated like a retuning hero by Part 6, even though he's murdered scores of teens in the previous films. If anyone remembers the Walking Tall TV series, it's took the same route as Buford's exploits in the region given the American Hero (large man in authority overcomes near death) treatment.

Of course I realize that Mr. Pusser was a living, breathing human being and have the utmost respect for him and his family. The movie has always been a personal favorite of mine and I've quote him many times in public speaking.

reply

What's wrong with gambling prostitution or making your own booze(

reply