Pacino should have won Best Actor for Serpico
no one remembers Save The Tiger.
shareI remember it & watched it again just a few months ago. It's still a fine, heartbreaking film, too. Though I agree that it was a great year for fantastic performances; I wish they could have given out more than just one Best Actor award that year.
shareI agree. Lemmon did well, but I do feel Pacino gave a more timeless performance (which is still remembered today; whereas people have forgotten this movie)
The Academy ended up giving Pacino the award for "Scent of a Woman" decades later, to make-up for his failure to ever win an award. Serpico would have made a better win in his resume than Scent of a Woman
But at the same time --- I think the Academy felt that Lemmon was due; at the time, Lemmon had never won for Best Actor (only once for Supporting Actor). The Academy couldn't let him go winless, they felt
This is a great movie --- NOT shown enough
Jack did a better job than the others
Jack Gilford SHOULD have won Best Supporting Actor