MovieChat Forums > Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid (1973) Discussion > The film vs. the historical events

The film vs. the historical events


Right off the bat let me say that Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid might be my favorite Western of all time, so none of what follows is a critique of the film. I'd simply like to point out where the film stayed true to the historical record and where it diverged from history for dramatic reasons. So please refrain from any, "it's not a documentary!" comments.

Potentially surprising things the movie gets right:

The friendship between Billy the Kid and Pat Garrett: While some historians go out of their way to debunk the idea that Garrett and the Kid were friends, Paulita Maxwell (likely one of the Kid's many lovers) said otherwise:

"Pat Garrett was as close a friend as [Billy] had in Fort Sumner and was on friendly terms with every member of [Billy's] gang. When we saw Pat and Billy together we used to call them 'the long and short of it.'...He ate and drank and played cards with [Billy], went to dances with him and gallivanted around with the same Mexican girls. I have seen them both on their knees around a horse blanket stretched on the ground in the main street gambling their heads off against a monte game. If Pat went broke, he borrowed from Billy, and if Billy went broke, he borrowed from Pat...Oh, yes, Garrett and [Billy] were as thick as two peas in a pod."

Would Garrett have actually gone and warned the Kid that he was coming for him if he didn't leave the territory? Perhaps not (the origin for that scene comes from the novel The Authentic Death of Hendry Jones, which Peckinpah adapted into a screenplay that, after many changes, became One-Eyed Jacks) but the historians who say that Garrett and the Kid weren't friends seem to be taking Garrett's word for it (the fact that Garrett kept going out of his way to mention that he wasn't friends with the Kid suggests to me that those accusations were flying around at the time). We'll never know how close Garrett and the Kid were, but their relationship in the film definitely aligns with Maxwell's account.

The escape from the Lincoln County Courthouse/Jail: Billy's escape from the Lincoln County Jail in the film is almost exactly from the historical eyewitness accounts. The film presents the theory that someone hid a gun in the outhouse for Billy, and while we don't know that for sure, many historians still hold to it. The rest of the events aren't up for debate: the fact that Garrett left to collect taxes during the Kid's escape, the shooting of Bell on the stairway of the courthouse, and the shooting of Ollinger with his own shotgun in the street (before smashing it and throwing the pieces at Ollinger's body). Some of the more outlandish parts of this sequence are straight from the historical record. For example, Bob Ollinger's final words (when someone shouted, "The Kid's killed Bell!" Bob Ollinger did reply, "He's killed me too."), the Kid's slow, unmolested escape after killing two deputies (the Kid did sing for a crowd of onlookers as he slowly gathered guns and cartridges and no one made any attempt to stop him), and the Kid did take a man's horse after the one he was given bucked him off (and in fact, the Kid sent the "stolen" horse back and it returned to Lincoln and its owner a few days later...which was too unbelievable for the movie even though it's true!). I'll touch upon a few of the minor things that are historically inaccurate about this scene later.

The chicken shooting: The controversial chicken shooting scene isn't just pointless animal cruelty on Peckinpah's part, it comes straight from Garrett's account wherein the Kid shoots a bunch of chickens while talking about wiping out his enemies.

A gang member named Alias: In Garrett's book, Billy is said to have rode into Lincoln with a guy calling himself Alias. There's not much more said about the character, but the wacky name is not an invention by Peckinpah or Rudy Wurlitzer.

One of Billy's friends did get killed while Billy chased wild turkeys: In the film, while the Kid and Alias ride off to chase wild turkeys their Mexican friend Silva is killed by some of Chisum's cowboys. His body is then propped up onto his dead horse's rear to make it look like he's having sex with it. While this particular scene never really happened, it does mirror a real incident in the Kid's life. Three years before the events of the film, John Tunstall, a friend of the Kid's, was shot to death by Dolan/Murphy gunmen while the Kid and a friend chased wild turkeys. John Tunstall's skull was then crushed by a rock and his body was placed next to his horse (which they also killed) in order to make it look like they were two lovers lying next to each other in bed. This event kicked off the Lincoln County War and sealed the Kid's fate as an outlaw as he swore to kill everyone involved in Tunstall's slaying. The Silva scene is clearly a nod to this event.

Garrett's shooting of the Kid: The scenes involving Garrett's shooting of the Kid come straight from Garrett's account. It's very likely that the Kid was making love to one of his senoritas right before he died (possibly Paulita Maxwell). Garrett did come with Deputies John Poe and Kip McKinney to Pete Maxwell's house in Fort Sumner and while Poe and McKinney were outside, Garrett did hide in the darkness of Pete's bedroom. The Kid entered with a knife (and possibly a pistol) and sensing someone there he asked "Quien es?" before Garrett shot him in the chest. Garrett fired a second shot that hit the mantle (not a mirror).

All of this is by memory, so feel free to correct me on any mistakes I've made.

I'll do an account of the film's inaccuracies next...



http://www.facebook.com/scarletworm

http://facebook.com/davidlambertart

reply

Here's a list of inaccuracies in the film and the storytelling reasoning behind them:

Character Ages: The biggest complaint lobbed at Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid is the fact that Kris Kristofferson was about 15 years too old to be playing the Kid. I don't think that's a particularly fair complaint for a number of reasons. First off, while it's widely accepted that the Kid was 21 when Pat Garrett shot him, there's no hard evidence for that. Some say the Kid was closer to 18, and according to the Kid's own word (given to a census taker) he would have been 26 when he died. Beyond that, there are big storytelling reasons for moving the Kid's age up in years. In the film, it's necessary to show the Kid as something of a burnout. This aligns with The Authentic Death of Hendry Jones (a huge influence on the film) wherein the Kid is a tired 26 yr old gunfighter who knows his time is up and waits around for the Pat Garrett surrogate to come kill him. It also underscores why Garrett "sells out" because he doesn't want to wind up an aimless old man sitting around, drinking and shooting the heads off chickens. None of this would be palpable if the Kid was portrayed as a 21 yr old.

Likewise, Garrett is portrayed older in the film than he was during the events in real life. The real Garrett was only 31 when he killed the Kid. His age was moved up not only to align with the Kid's but to show that he's getting too old for the life the Kid leads. A 31 yr old in the part wouldn't get that across.

Some of the minor characters are portrayed older than they were when the events of the film transpired. Tom O'Folliard was 22 when he died. In the film he was played by then 36 yr old screenwriter Rudy Wurlitzer. For some reason Wurlitzer didn't portray Charlie Bowdre, who was 32 when he died. Instead Bowdre was portrayed by 20 yr old Charles Martin Smith (It seems to me that the roles should have been switched, but it's a minor part of the film). Pete Maxwell was in his 30s when the Kid was killed in his house. The character in the film is portrayed as an elderly man in his 70s.

Garrett's Death: The first obvious inaccuracy in the film is the date of Pat Garrett's death. Garrett was killed in 1908 but the title card in the Preview Cut lists the year as 1909. Peckinpah was aware of the error, and he left a note to his editors to change the date for the finalized cut. Of course, Peckinpah was never able to do a finalized cut, and the theatrical version omitted this scene completely. While Garrett was killed over a quarrel about sheep on his land, he was not shot while going for a rifle, and Poe had nothing to do with his murder. Officially, Garrett was killed by Wayne Brazel (who was acquitted of the crime) who shot him in the back while he was urinating. The film makes these changes in order to underscore how the killing of the Kid was a symbolic act of Garrett actually killing himself. In the film there are references to Garrett buying land on a loan from Chisum, who was a primary force behind the ordering of the Kid's death. So it's thematically consistent (and quite brilliant, I think) that the land would result in his own death (it also nicely parallels the potter's field that Judas purchases with the 30 pieces of silver he sold out Jesus for).

The Shootout at Stinking Springs: In the film, the Kid, Charlie Bowdre and Tom O'Folliard are ambushed by Pat Garrett and his posse while hiding out in a small cabin. Bowdre is shot in the doorway while going to feed the horses and the Kid sends him out as a decoy while he tries to make an escape with O'Folliard. A few of Garrett's posse is killed and O'Folliard takes a bullet to the neck, killing him instantly. The Kid then surrenders while Garrett has to stop his deputy Bob Ollinger from killing the Kid outright.

In reality, O'Folliard had been killed 4 days earlier by Garrett and his posse during an ambush in Fort Sumner. At the cabin in Stinking Springs (which was snowy at this time), the Kid was hiding out with Charlie Bowdre, Dirty Dave Rudabaugh, Billy Wilson and Tom Pickett. Bowdre was shot by Garrett's posse in the doorway of the cabin as he walked to feed the horses (he was wearing the Kid's hat so Garrett thought he was shooting the Kid). The Kid then sent Bowdre out with a gun and told him to kill some of the posse before he died. Bowdre stumbled outside and collapsed in Garrett's arms (Garrett regretted the killing because Bowdre had secretly met with Garrett a few days before, expressing his desire to quit his life of crime). There was a standoff that lasted all day, with the Kid trying to pull his horse inside and Garrett shooting his horse so that the doorway would be blocked by its corpse. He then shot the reigns of the rest of the gang's horses, scattering them. The Kid and his men finally gave up when they smelled Garrett's posse cooking breakfast. Garrett had to restrain a posse member named Barney Mason from killing the Kid outright. Clearly this was all compressed to save time and maintain clarity (no point in introducing Rudabaugh, Wilson and Pickett to the story since they have no further impact on the Kid's life and having Ollinger take the place of trigger happy Mason makes for a good introduction to the character).

More later!

http://www.facebook.com/scarletworm

http://facebook.com/davidlambertart

reply

I've enjoyed reading this very much! I hope you add more sometime.

reply

I think Young Guns was probably more accurate. JMHO I don't know.


If dont read the newspaper you are uninformed. If you do...you are misinformed---Mark Twain

reply

Well, that's sort of difficult to gauge for a few reasons.

1. Young Guns covers a different time in the Kid's life entirely.

2. Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid takes a gap in the historical record and fills it in, while Young Guns tries to follow a lot of specific events in the Kid's life (the killing of Tunstall, the killing of Sheriff Brady, the gunfight with Buckshot Roberts, and the siege of the McSween house) and screws them up. The historical scenes that Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid dramatizes are far more accurate than the historical scenes Young Guns dramatizes, but Young Guns does dramatize more events from the historical record.

Now Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid and Young Guns 2 cover a lot of the same ground, and I would say Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid is far more accurate in the scenes that they share.

My guess is that Gore Vidal's Billy the Kid starring Val Kilmer is the most factually accurate take on the Kid, but it doesn't do anything interesting with those facts. Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid is a brilliant reworking of the Kid's mythology by people that knew that history but didn't make themselves slaves to it. Rudy Wurlitzer's original script was actually pretty close to the historical record, but was somewhat inert in a dramatic sense.

http://www.facebook.com/scarletworm

http://facebook.com/davidlambertart

reply

Heh... good ol' Samoan "I like pie" Bob.

Nice to see you're still active on this board my friend... keep them good posts a-comin'!

reply

In my original post, I question whether Pat Garrett would actually warn the Kid to leave the territory...well, I've just found out that according to John P. Meadows (who knew Garrett and the Kid) Garrett claimed to have told the Kid to leave the territory over a game of cards.

http://www.facebook.com/scarletworm

http://facebook.com/davidlambertart

reply

I appreciate your insights into 1 of my favorite movies regardless of genre of all time..Thank you..the movie itself featured an all star cast..Kris Kristofferson and James Coburn...with a supporting cast of Chill Wills, Slim Pickens, Katy Jurado, LQ Jones, Jack Elam, Richard Jaeckel, Barry Sullivan, R.G. Armstrong, Luke Askew, Harry Dean Stanton, Paul Fix..even an uncredited role for Bruce Dern..and to add to that Bob Dylan with a performance as Alias..along with a soundtrack that rivals even the great Ennio Morricone's great scores..directed by Sam Peckingpah..Man o Man...That is some talent..

reply