An attitude long gone


I just saw this in a club screening and while Alexandre seems pretentious, volatile and a bit childish most of the time, I also get to feel that he was born at least thirty years too late. He (and his friends too) are a remnant of a way of life which was old and fading already by '73 and now seeems long gone. *Nobody* is as direct and frank as this anymore, no one would show his own weak spots like this. We've all become a lot more fast-paced, conscious of how we appear, more telegenic and above all smoother. Sure, if Alexandre didn't have Marie or others to live by - does she really pay for his café rounds all of the time or does he have a monthly allowance from his Dad, to keep away from the hometown? - he might drop into the place of a Seine clochard.
But there is a need for outsiders beyond the age of twenty too; I mean genuine outsiders, not just people who dress up, get in the telly for fifteen minutes and pretend to be hard-lined outsiders. Alecxandre acts silly, thinks he's quite irresistible, and he doesn't see he's hurting people, O.K, but he's also a guy who can see right through pretention. I feel, at least sometimes he plumbs the pretences in himself too, though it's not said openly - more to the point, he wouldn't mind, not having downed a glass of whisky at least, telling the corrupt big boss to go scr*w himself. To quote a poet from my native Sweden:

As everybody's busy
all the time, running around the hall,
it's of the utmost importance
that one man journeys away from it all.

reply

*shamelessly bumping this because I think it still stands*

"If you know one happy man in this world, tell me his name quickly - and please give me his phone number!"

-Gustav Mahler

reply

I agree with your point, but I disagree with your perception (and others on this board) of Alexandre.

Alexandre is not speaking insensibly or acting silly or irresponsible or intentionally hurting people, nothing he says is laughable or empty or irrelevant, he is not prattling without practise.

He delivers one of the two most heartbreaking monologues in the film (and one of the most heartbreaking monologues in film history, along with Veronika's monologue): the monologue about Gilberte aborting his unborn child.

That particular moment is his defining moment, he reveals his heart and soul, and that moment explains the reason for why he was intentionally masking, and liquidating, his hard-hitting powerful remarks with puerile, insouciant, sarcastic, amorphous banter.

When the film opens, he was pretending to be something that he was not because he was sick of socializing with "fake" people in a "fake" world; at the beginning of the film, he has already suffered through Gilberte's abortion, an episode we learn about midway through the film.

He was sick with himself for having missed the meaning of the Revolution (May 1968...), he was sick of trying to pretend to be a part of the Revolution, he was sick of pretending to maintain the Revolutionary spirit that he himself never had, he was sick of the inability of people to say to each other the things that really mattered, he was sick of being lost in France, he was sick of his boredom, he was at the end of his rope.

He was pretending to prattle about nothing while simultaneously, and intentionally, delivering some of the most powerful things that he probably ever said in his whole life; he intentionally treacled together battology and brummagem and brachylogy, stirred in sophistry and casuism and stochasticism, sneaped everything with disinterested theatrics, pitched in a dose of gauche, and coloured everything with his pain and malaise and weaknesses and monophobia.

His directness and frankness were natural and unassuming and unpremeditated, his motivations and words were purposeful, he was an extremely hurt, confused (logical-confused - he was confused by human nature and the seeming purposelessness of life), and lost young man, and at no time ever was he intending to hurt anyone or empty-headed or speaking nonsense.

reply

"His directness and frankness were natural and unassuming and unpremeditated, his motivations and words were purposeful, he was an extremely hurt, confused (logical-confused - he was confused by human nature and the seeming purposelessness of life), and lost young man, and at no time ever was he intending to hurt anyone or empty-headed or speaking nonsense."

I agree 100% with you. That was a great analysis of Alexandre. I think he also had an amazing, cynical sense of humour which reflected the apparent meaninglessness and purposelessness of the world; he was really hilarious at times. And he was often spot-on with his observations.

I don't want realism. I want magic!

reply