spot on, as i just thought of something, this first roger moore movie shares some similarities with sean connery's first bond "dr. no", the whole bit about supernatural things, in dr. no they believed in the dragon, in this you've even got quarrel's son in a similar role if i'm not mistaken, the locations and settings are a bit similar, i never knew it was suppose to be the same quarrel, this is all new to me. unfortunately "licence to kill" is a humourless sadistic like (well just think about what happens to felix since you brought him up) flick with a bone dry bond, personally i stop watching the franchise after 1985 (a view to a kill). this is really one groovy bond flick and the contrast between british secret agent bond and south american sheriff j.w. pepper is a riot, so much they even brought him back in the following movie "the man with the golden gun" which i can never get over ever since i heard the fact jack palance was suppose to play the villain, i like christopher lee, but that part was like literary made for western movie star jack palance, that would probably have been my favorite bond movie if palance had actually been in the part. it says in the opening credits to this "introducing jane seymour", that means this was her first movie role, right? she may not have gotten the most outstanding role, but man, look at those jugs. it sure sounds like her currently narrating an add on cnn. "are you sure that was your brother in law, j.w?"
🕴🐊 🐊 🐊 🐊 🐊 🚤 🚌 ♠️ ♣️ ♥️ ♦️ 🃏 🎴 🚃 🚆
cant stand you in harms way,
you belong in warm comfortable place,
with your perfect face,
like made for smilin except when strict as hell.
reply
share