MovieChat Forums > The Friends of Eddie Coyle (1973) Discussion > TFoEC as morality play *SPOILERS*

TFoEC as morality play *SPOILERS*


Forgive me if this has been discussed, I am new to the board and didn't see a topic like this. At first I hated the ending. But it grew on me. I accepted it. Now, I don't see it ending any other way.

These past few years, I have revisited a number of these '70s 'anti-hero' movies where the 'bad guy(s)' are the focus of the story. Bonnie & Clyde, Thunderbolt & Lightfoot, Anderson Tapes, Death Wish, The Getaway, Thomas Crown Affair, etc. It was a big swerve in perspective for America, and the disappointments of Viet Nam, Watergate, race riots, Kent State, Patty Hearst, Weather Underground, etc. really rattled the way "we" (I was an adolescent, but had always thought of the U.S. as 'the good guys' and our leaders as righteous and honest) saw the country.

But the bottom line is, Eddie Coyle is not a nice guy. He is a parasite, middleman to gun sellers dealing to punks who are going to rob banks and maybe commit terrorism. He is a criminal, leaving his family to fend for themselves on welfare ("like n*****s" in Coyle's words) and costing society for his imprisonment. He contributes nothing good to the world. And this story is a morality play; Coyle's situation is entirely of his own making. He chose his path. He's not even very good at what he does, certainly not financially successful. At least he died with a drunk on, thinking he was on his way "to meet some girls" (and cheat on his wonderful wife who clearly loves him more than he deserves), and not screaming for his life through tears and snot on his knees in some sandpit.

So, like 'The Sopranos' and 'The Shield' recently, we got to see a scumbag (charming though he may be) get his comeuppance. A more recent crime-thriller, 'The Town', ended in an ambiguous way where a murdering lowlife corrupted a simple bank teller with an implied promise they will be together sometime in the future, and leaving her unearned stolen money. I hated that ending. For The Friends of Eddie Coyle, I loved the ending. Just had to put it all down, hope somebody find it of interest and better yet, wants to add or improve or disagree. Cheers!

reply

I agree - it was the only way for Eddie to end up, and there is a lot of morality play to it. It is such a depressing, going down the drain world the film depicts - you watch it and you don't want to go there.

reply

Foley, the agent, makes it explicit that everything is Eddie's own choice.

-----------------------------------------------
"Why do people always laugh in the wrong places?"
--Howie Carr

reply

I think it's painfully obvious that it's a morality play...if it wasn't the way that he lived (not unlike Al Pacino's character in Donnie Brasco - nothing more, nothing less), then it should have certainly been driven home (no pun intended) by the way he died. Certainly, there was nothing glamorous about this criminal's life.

But considering the OP's statement about Eddie Coyle not being a contributor to society, or being a scumbag, etc...there are rules set forth in filmmaking (and storytelling in general), some of them unspoken, that hold that films about criminals (or just "bad guys" in general) have to end in a certain way, and it wasn't just Hayes-Code era films...it still holds true today, in general. Now, The Friends Of Eddie Coyle is based on a true story that likely didn't end much differently than this one did. But I'm of the opinion that the reason for these "rules" is so the audience can feel superior to the film's characters, in a way. I think too many people flatter themselves that they are "contributors" to society because they live a government- or society- approved lifestyle. In capitalist societies we are consumers - nothing more, nothing less. Sure, the cop tells Eddie that he's to blame for his troubles...but is the cop not as big a "scumbag" as anyone in the film?? Who is he to pass judgment on the one guy in FoEC who has any HONOR?!? Yes, that's right, HONOR. You see, that's the real lesson in FoEC - that being the one viper in the pit that has honor WILL GET YOU NOWHERE!

I'm gonna step off my soapbox now, but I'll leave with this thought: I'd think that the recent years of Wall Street robber barons and criminals would lead people to realize that just because you operate within the confines of the "law", or because you might seem "legitimate" to the eyes of the public or government, does not make it so. And just getting up and going to a "legitimate" job every day does not make you some great contributor to society. It's all illusion. But far be it from me to shatter any of those...

"The things I do for love..." Jaime Lannister

reply

"Now, The Friends Of Eddie Coyle is based on a true story that likely didn't end much differently than this one did."

It was based on a novel by George V Higgins. I've never heard it said that either the novel or the movie was based on a true story.

reply

"The character Eddie Coyle bore an uncanny resemblance to ex-convict William (Billy) O'Brien, one of James J. "Whitey" Bulger's old bank-robbing associates who had been murdered in 1967, three years before the book's publication. O'Brien, like Coyle, had just been arrested and the newspapers reported that O'Brien's associates were concerned that he might become a turncoat. O'Brien's slaying was never solved, nor was Coyle's."

reply

this is one of the most boring interpretations I've ever read. It's sad that certain people think that art can be distilled down to cliches, bromides, and banalities.

reply

sgnewman2000 on Tue Jul 24 2012 11:29:41
---------------------------------------------------------------------
this is one of the most boring interpretations I've ever read. It's sad that certain people think that art can be distilled down to cliches, bromides, and banalities.


Great contribution to the thread. Now we all know what you think. We should respect this because....?!?!! Exactly why can't 'art' (your word) NOT be distilled down to cliches, bromides, and banalities?*tick, tick, tick* Yeah, I didn't think so. Usually, opinions are backed up with examples, alternatives, or something that establishes credibility. You've done none of that, just seem to have an entitled attitude that your opinion has value.

It's sad that certain people think that their opinion on another's opinion can be distilled down to cliches, bromides, and banalities. You need to retake Troll 101. You are not ready.

reply

Your OP is fine, better than most.

reply

A morality play in the sense that Eddie and his milieu are a microcosm of the USA. Think of Eddie as a symbol of the American warfare state, a small man representing the arms firms which are flogging drone missiles to the goverment, which end up turning Palestinian and Afghan children into dogmeat....

Marlon, Claudia and Dimby the cats 1989-2005, 2007 and 2010.

reply